The three Supreme Court Cases from our readings all have differing questions, applicable theories of morals, ethics and legal precedence that require consideration. It is crucial to acknowledge that although our Constitution and many laws rely on philosophy, not all legislation is moral, and may even be immoral. I feel the best method is to look at each case and weigh its morals and legality as well. Each of these cases created conflicts within my mind, tested my ability to be impartial, and left me glad I am not a judge. Case #1 involves the No Duty to Rescue Law, which was put to test in New York. I unequivocally disagree with the judge who acquitted the two transit workers for failing to make any worthwhile attempt to save the young women
