Summary Of On The Genealogy Of Morality By Nietzche

Improved Essays
In his collection of essays On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche distinguishes between the moral systems of good/bad and good/evil and describes their origins, as well as problems that arise with the origins of good/evil in order to analyze two different moral systems and their implications. Nietzsche first distinguishes between the two moral systems of good/bad and good/evil in order to draw a contrast. Good/bad is defined as those with power and those without power: the good, like the warrior caste, have the power while the bad, like the poor, do not have the power. This is a binary way of viewing morality where good is the exact opposite of bad. The binary of good/bad does not implicate anyone for their status but is instead based in …show more content…
First, it neglects to acknowledge the outliers of the binary, in that there can be good that is associated with the masters and bad that is associated with the slave. The last three issues arise when Nietzsche provides the examples of the lambs and the birds of prey. In this story, the lambs are good, the slaves, and the birds of prey are evil, the masters. Nietzsche makes three claims within this story: it is only the fault of language that we separate the bird of prey from its natural action and because of this failing the lambs fault the birds of prey for killing them, despite it being the bird's natural instinct. Additionally, the binary of good/evil is born of resentment and that can implicate others that are not evil. Nietzsche claims that through language we dissociate actions from subjects, thus making the action appear as an afterthought. Nietzsche describes this as “taking the latter for an action… separates strength from expression of strength.” The consequence of attaching “bad” actions to people, or similar people, has allowed the idea of good to be born of resentment. This cloud one's judgement on the true definition of good and evil, as association becomes one’s only basis for good/bad. Nietzsche most directly describes the failure of moral judgements. If someone only has one reference point for what is good and one reference point for what is bad, there is a whole spectrum in the middle that can be lost or miscterogorized. Often humans develop ideas of what is good and bad, and if something does not fit their definition of good it is automatically bad, and vice versa. This can cause failings in moral judgements as humans are unable to collectively identify one person as evil. The dissociation of actions from subjects too affects the slaves as it blames the slaves for their weakness, rather than acknowledging weakness as their natural

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A Comparison of Medina and Nietzsche’s Philosophy The philosophies of Jose Medina and Friedrich Nietzsche differ in the sense that Medina focuses on the epistemic injustice while Nietzsche focuses on deconstructing morality. Medina explores injustice in society with the goal of finding factors that contribute to its existence. In essence, the philosopher believes morality to be a noble human virtue, and a factor that can be used to eliminate social injustices. However, due to social beliefs that alter the perspectives of oppressors and the oppressed, it becomes difficult to champion for morality. In the case of Friedrich Nietzsche, he argues that morality is a questionable human virtue that has no objective place in reality.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Nietzsche, The first essay in his book “Genealogy of Morality’’ that there are two kinds of morals that is master morality and the slave morality. For master morality, good is the powerful beautiful, and glorious while bad is the weak and the ugly. Slave morality on the other hand call the masters evil for having no reservations on how they use their power over the weak. This therefore makes the compassionate and the respectful weak good. What Nietzsche seeks to establish is that the difference between the good and bad and the good and evil is a querry of where the assessment originates.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The issues in Anderson’s paper instead lie in his assumption that the other type of post-racialism, prescriptive ideals, are inherently bad. In his effort to arrive at this conclusion, Anderson employs a narrow perspective similar to that of idiot post-racialists to judge a broad…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche makes an important distinction between the words “evil” and bad” even though they are both considered the opposite of “good.” He says that it is the individual views of the common man and the noble man that created these different concepts. The word “bad” originated from the nobles, and the word “evil” came from the ressentiment of the common people. Another important reason that these two words have different meanings is because the nobles and the common people do not share the same concept of “good.” To a person of ressentiment, whatever is good to a noble man is evil. Nietzsche elaborates more on this when he illustrates an example of a lamb and bird of prey. He uses the relationship between these two animals to explain the relationship between the nobility…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author explains that humans are too flawed to rule. It is in our nature to lean towards self-interest which easily puts us on the course for tyranny. So only reason, the "guardian of what is just and...equal," not nature, can lead to a just social balance. Justice in the Qur 'an is submission and the fear of God. Allah, as God is referred as, is described as "terrible in his retribution" yet all-forgiving.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche presents a potent challenge to morality by saying that Morality is one kind of ethical system that promoting narcosis, calm and passive. It is created by hatred priests who are envying of Nobles’ power and strength and horrified of pain, struggle, and restlessness. It is hindering human flourishing now but yet necessary to help us get into a better post-moral society, finally, enable human flourishing. Nietzsche unfolds his argument by firstly categorize different kinds of ethical system. Secondly, he explains how they those systems change among society and why he claim morality is a new kind of ethical system different from the previous one.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (I:16) Lastly, Nietzsche brings up the notion that grammar has led us to think of things as independent subject and actions when in reality subjects are nothing but actions. (I:17) With this emphasis of separation, Nietzsche sees how the slave morality, or the weak, can conceive that to be “good” is to not have strength by not killing or enduring hardship, ultimately seeing their weakness as freedom, which he notes is…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grendel Good Vs Evil

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Good and evil, the two things that sit on your shoulders. Evil is the opposite of good. It is defined as profoundly immoral and malevolent. Many factors go into determining how one may define this word. Isiah 5:20 says, “Woe unto them that call evil good and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter.” Someone may not recognize evil and have been raised through evil acts but it does not make it better.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This fear “tames” us, making it less likely that we will exact our violent will to power on others, but it in no way negates this will to power. And so, Nietzsche says, we turn these aggressive impulses inward, and mutilate our own souls (Nietzsche, 57). This is the only way we are able to express our will without fear of punishment, but in the end it becomes the cause of our own sickness. We make ourselves ill because we prioritize escaping punishment over following our…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Callicles goes on to state that “those who set down the laws are the weak human beings and many. It is therefore in reference to themselves and their own advantage that they set down the laws and praises their praises and blame their blames.” (Gorgias, 483b) Conventional justice is bad suffering in Callicles’ opinion as it is the people who lay down the laws that are frightened of the powerful because they have more and they themselves don’t want more as having more is most shameful and also unjust. Seeking injustice, as Callicles states, is having more than others. Nature, the opposite, reveals that having…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays