Of 'Section V Of The Enquiry Concerning The Principles Of Morals'

Decent Essays
Weekly Writing Assignment Six
Abigail Fisher

In Section V of the Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, Hume considers the idea that social virtues are valued by individuals because they are beneficial to themselves. However, he goes on to say that nature and experience are two things that seem to impose this theory of selfishness. He also argues that individuals tend to highly regard virtuous actions that have occurred in the past. Hume uses the example of a banished statesman who has been offered kindness from his enemy even when he must leave the town. If it were learned that the event happened thousands of years prior, there would still be praise given in the present without any selfish intent from the praiser. Next, Hume says

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A fundamental concept not only to free-markets but to much of human interaction is that of self-interest; or, as Adam Smith refers to it in his work "The Theory of Moral Sentiments" (1759): "self-love". Selfishness is also an important concept that must be differentiated and expressed in terms so as to not confuse the two as if they are purely derived from and interchangeable to one another. Accordingly, it is the goal of this article to differentiate the concepts of self-interest and selfishness: to praise the concept of self-interest as the moral drive for approbation and admiration, and to admonish selfishness as the motivator of immorality and hedonism.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The values of all human beings are different. There are different variations or sides of the same values or completely contradicting views. Lord Chesterfield, an eighteenth century author wrote a letter to his son who was traveling far from him. Lord Chesterfield carefully uses the rhetorical strategies of ethos, pathos, and logos to describe his values of loyalty, directness and conformity. Lord Chesterfield expresses his value of loyalty quite obviously in this letter.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rand’s Objectivism Aristotle’s concept of Virtue Thomas Aquinas’ concept of conscience Socrates’ concept of excellence 2. (TCOs 1, 2, 7) What is the moral ideal of temperance? (Points : 5) Exercising control over one’s own desires and inclinations…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Societies’ morals is composed of benevolent visions and inadequate wills. Though we view humanitarian efforts as beneficial, we are often reluctant to participate and provide support to the humanitarian field. At times, many of us even choose to subdue our sympathetic willingness to aid by distancing ourselves and ignoring new information. This is not to say that we become entirely insensitive to global crisis and people’s suffering, but rather that we are so occupied with the convenience of our lifestyles that we would prefer to neglect the moral obligations we have to others in order to maintain our comfort. As such, even though we understand the essentiality of humanitarian aid and generally would like to see dire global and domestic problems…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a bill of rights for in the Constitution of Canada. A Morality Clause, on the other hand, is used for the “control over peoples’ conduct…which is done through a contractual provision prohibiting a person’s immoral, illegal or otherwise disparaging conduct.” From time to time, the Charter and Clause do fit together as the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Morality Clauses are both basically “contracts” that a certain audience has to follow. The Canadian Charter and the Morality Clauses can seem immensely similar but are exceedingly distinct.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It seems Herrera tries to justify his wrong doings and make excuses for his unethical behavior in the beginning of his interview. Herrera’s actions are related to “cognitive rationalizations” because he admits in his interview that he was truly convinced that what he was doing was moral. (Fitch. 2011.) He was taught no other way and was being praised for it by his superiors. He said he knew it was wrong, at times, but, also, thought that is what he needed to do to get drug dealers and guns off the streets.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “Uphold these principles, ever conscious that public office is a public trust.” When there is no trust, what’s left is the door and opportunity to corruption and evasion of persecution till sometimes it’s way too late. That is why “There is a code of ethics that was unanimously passed by the United States Congress on June 27, 1980, and signed into law as Public Law 96-303 by the President on July 3, 1980.” ("34 CFR Part 73, Appendix to Part 73 - Code of Ethics for Government Service"). With that being said let’s look at the code of ethics.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bouncing off the idea that the ends don't justify the means, it's a tad absolutist to claim that the ends never justify the means, and then to denigrate a character,based on that absolute, is excessive. Retroactively applying a modern Judeo-Christian view of morality to Elizabethan theater characters is troublesome. Not only is it logically troublesome,but it also problematic as a literary interpretation. It is reading oneself, or one's proclivities/biases, into the work. Not to mention the view oversimplifies centuries of religious debate and doctrine to a simple forgiveness of sins/martyrdom, which is odd considering that would be limiting a centuries old religion to a relatively new aspect of it(New Testament).…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The psychological egoist feels that in everything humans do, they are motivated internally by self-interest. The argument made by the psychological egoist was that since the unselfish actions always produce self-satisfaction, these actions should then be considered selfish. Rachels’ reply to this argument questioned the reasoning behind the belief that is someone acts in a way that helps others, they are automatically selfish. He stated that it is the unselfish man who gets self-satisfaction from helping others, and that the selfish man does not. (14) He compares this to the story of Abraham Lincoln, in which he “got peace of mind” from saving the pigs.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The challenge of determining what is considered morally permissible is daunting. Perhaps even more intimidating is conveying which people are worthy of the most moral praise; in other words, deciding which people who commit moral actions actually deserve the moral worth to be had from those actions. There are two views precisely on this idea that I will analyze. The first view, associated with Kantians, is based on duty, (Kant, 320) while the second view, associated with Aristotelians, is based on virtue (Aristotle, 130). The view generally associated with Kantians and the view generally associated with Aristotelians both have their similarities and differences; those which make them appealing, and those which make them clash with one another.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sensible Knave Essay

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes position on whether “injustice is not in the interest of the unjust” is rather convincing because Hobbes explains that the “fool” said that “in his heart, there is no such thing as justice; and sometimes also with his tongue seriously alleging, that every man’s conservation and contentment, being committed to his own care, there could be no reason, why every man might not do what he thought conduced thereunto: and therefore also to make, or not to make; keep or not to keep covenants ,was against reason” (Hobbes 309). The meaning behind this is that justice doesn’t exist because if every man is committed to doing good and not breaking a covenant, there is no reason for anything to be injustice, unless, someone breaches a covenant thus…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cicero writes to his son Marcus “On Duties” (Cicero, 1960) explaining the practical code of behavior. His emphasis includes the view of “the unnaturalness of doing wrong” (p. 166). According to Cicero, looting or harming another for personal increase destroyed the unquestionable conception of nature which “unites every human being with every other” (p. 166). Yet there is nothing wrong or unnatural in making a living. Adherence to nature is the driving force rather than self-gratification.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle Selflessness

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguing Aristotle’s Views on Selflessness I would like to preface this paper with stating that the study of ethics is an attempt to understand what is "good" or "bad" for the good of society and the development of human character. It attempts to test ideas and values scientifically, and the study of ethics is justified by the fact that strong, heathy societies cannot exist without an ethical system. In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics the book XI he tries to explain perfect and imperfect friendship. As well as self-love and how these relate to bettering the community. While all the ideas I agree with Aristotle about self-love being important I believe that he dismisses selflessness with being inferior.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ayn Rand's Altruism Theory

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this paper I will use the views and theories of Ayn Rand on altruism, James Rachels’ view psychological egoism and Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative in order to propose a moral theory on how we ought to behave both individually and as a society. As a frame of reference, I will first present a case on why psychological egoism applies to humans which will tie in with both individual and global morality. In the same way, I will state reasons why I believe Rand was precise in pointing out the fact that altruism is arbitrary but misguided in her conclusion that people should be left to act in their own self-interest. As a final point, I will extend Kant’s views regarding morality with the help of psychological egoism and will give my conclusion…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Each one lives, waving selfishness; indeed, it is human nature; whereas, one's motives show its frame of mind and character, not nature. Each one lives, waving selfishness; indeed, it is human nature; whereas, one's motives show its frame of mind and character, not nature. Each one lives, waving selfishness; indeed, it is human nature; whereas, one's motives show its frame of mind and character, not nature.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays