Nonmaleficence: Avoiding Cusation Of Harm

Decent Essays
Nonmaleficence refers to the ethical norm of avoiding causation of harm. 33 It rests on the dictum of primum non nocere, ie, the provider’s obligation not to injure or harm patients and to refrain from actions that would harm them. The term “actions that would harm” highlights the fallibility of medicine, where harm is not always a predictable outcome but based on the probabilities of side effects and complications. Of course, adverse events imply maleficent conduct because harm was not prevented. However, subsequent nondisclosure or incompetent disclosure conduct can be maleficent as well. Providers may decide to exercise their largely discredited “therapeutic privilege” and choose not to disclose an error “for the patient’s benefit”. Such nondisclosure might cause serious additional harm to a patient if it impedes or delays necessary medical intervention. constituting a breach of providers’ ethical duty to learn from past errors in order to protect future patients who might be harmed by a repetition of the same error. …show more content…
Thus, the ethical dictum “do not injure” implies “do not abstain from disclosure”, and “refraining from harmful actions” mandates providers to disclose errors in a competent (ie, effective and appropriate)

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    New York City College of Technology City University of New York Law and Ethics Case: Jeanette M. and the Phone Call Erica Rotstein October 7, 2017 Professor Bonsignore HAS 3560 -Legal Aspects of Health Care Abstract The advancement in the field of medicine over the years has led to doctors and health care providers having more responsibilities on their hands. This brings into question what should and shouldn’t be done, as well as what is morally and ethically right. However, this isn’t so cut and dry.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Orr V. Bell Case Summary

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Exceptional care and professional responsibility is a standard form of practice the general public rely upon for their health care needs. But, what happens when codes of conduct, rules and codes of ethics are violated and physicians fail to provide adequate care and diagnostics? When circumstance like this arise, who becomes responsible for the negligence on behalf of the patient? In the case of Orr vs. Bell, due to the negligence on behalf of Dr. Bell, the patient Orr went misdiagnosed and eventually became paralyzed. The review of this case will document and prove due to Dr. Bell’s failure to follow nationally recognized Radiologic ethics and rules Dr. Bell failed to determine Orr’s medical issue and therefore was responsible for the outcome…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1960s, doctors were more reserved by not telling their patients the truth about their diagnoses. The majority of physicians will not revealed the truth to their patient for the reason they wouldn’t want to harm them in any way leading them to any desperate acts. “Physicians now emphasizes patient autonomy and informed consent over paternalism.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Test Item #2: The definition of the word autonomy means to be self-determined or to have free will. Patients, who are competent and are of an appropriate age, all have the ability to be autonomous when it comes to making decisions about their healthcare.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only exception is justified when is a mater of public interest and is a need to put into the balance the benefit or the harm of disclosure; analogously the healthcare team needs to consider disclosure of information against a child expressed decision under the 'Gillick Competent' if his best interest is in conflict with his own decision. If the patient, it is incompetent their medical record can be shared with family, key carers and other healthcare professionals aiming the patient's best interest (Hope et al 2008)19. However, regardless if the patient is competent or not, it is protected by law in the event of breaches of confidentiality can expand into harmful consequences impacting on patients well being…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clair mentions that there are some cases where Physicians tend to make mistakes alike any other human being. An example of this is a case in the article that happened to be of a woman who was misdiagnosed with cancer and then given a dosage of painkillers. Later on the autopsy concluded that the Physician had made a mistake, the woman was in fact cancer free. If only the Physician had not prescribed the lethal dosage as the woman would have still been alive. There dozens of cases which are similar to this particular case.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the unfortunate case of Canterbury versus Spence, had the patient believed he was properly informed about the procedure, there likely would not have been a suit. Not only do patients suffer when they are ill informed of the procedure they will undergo, but doctors face many consequences when the information provided is lacking or misunderstood. Doctors are constantly made to fear that the patient will seek legal retribution when outcomes are unexpected; the threat of a malpractice or negligence suit is constantly looming about. “Failure by a doctor to properly provide the…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction. Health care organizations are capitalizing on the root cause analysis (RCA) route to determine the focal cause of adverse events within their facilities. First developed as a tool used in the engineering sector, RCAs have been extended to health care in many ways and have proved to be highly effective in improving facility performance and safety. This paper provides a more in-depth look into RCAs while also showing one particular case study. RCA defined.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Informed Consent

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A competent patient’s refusal to consent to a medical or surgical procedure must be adhered to whether the refusal is ground on lack of confidence in physician, fear of procedure, or doubt in value of procedure(Pozgar, 2013, pg. 414). A physician must disclose to the patient the potential of death, serious harm, and other complications associated with the proposed procedure. The scope of a physician's duty to disclose is measured by the communications that a reasonable medical practitioner in that branch of medicine would make under the same or similar circumstances a position must Brazil to the patient the information that a skilled practitioner in good standing with provide under similar circumstances (Pozgar, 2013, pg. 407)..…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The relationship between a physician and their patient is one that should be composed of understanding and trust, as the intent of both parties is a shared value alleviating pain and overall content. However, there is uncertainty in the medical community when determining who “knows best” – the patient or the doctor. Is the patient entitled to the knowledge their doctor has concerning their case, or should the doctor be conservative in their explanations in an attempt to spare the patient’s psychological turmoil. This debate is exemplified in the article “Beneficence Today, or Autonomy (Maybe) Tomorrow” as the course of treatment for the patient, Monica, is reliant upon the doctors’ decision to either withhold information about the severity…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In chapter 13, it introduces the four principles of medical ethics. The four principles include; beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. Beneficence is the obligation of health care providers to health people who are in need. Nonmaleficence is the duty of a provider to do no harm and autonomy is the right of the patients to make choices regarding their own health care. Finally, justice is the concept of treating everyone in a fair manner.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Non-Maleficence?

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the class video, Sohin Chhatrala (2013) instructs that non-maleficence means “First, do no harm” and Roberta Carrol (2009) provides a similar definition in our text book as “avoiding harm” (p. 603). In Chapter 8, Carroll further explains that non-maleficence not only “asserts an obligation to prevent harm… [but also] if risks of harm must be taken, to minimize those risks” (Carroll, 2009, p. 263). Non-maleficence would include ensuring that patients receive appropriate treatments and would prevent any treatments from occurring that were unnecessary, incompetent, or aggressive (Maggio, J., 2015) Chhatrala (2013) expresses that the four basic principles of ethics are patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, it can be stated that acting without complete confidentiality, would not only be breaking the law but would also lead to negligent of the patients and damage professional standards for both a health care professional or the association they are affiliated…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reference: ETHICS IN MEDICINE. University of Washington School…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ABSTRACT Medical negligence is a combination of two words. The second word solely describes the meaning, though the meaning of negligence has not been described in a proper way but it is an act recklessly done by a person resulting in foreseeable damages to the other. Negligence is an offense under tort, IPC, Indian Contracts Act, Consumer Protection Act and many more. Medical Negligence basically is the misconduct by a medical practitioner or doctor by not providing enough care resulting in breach of their duties and harming the patients which are their consumers. A professional is deemed to be an expert in that field at least; a patient getting treated under any doctor surely expects to get healed and at least expects the doctor to be careful while performing his duties.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays