Niccolo Machiavelli's Gift To Lorenzo De Medici

Superior Essays
Niccolo Machiavelli’s gift to Lorenzo de Medici, The Prince, is a discourse discussing politics and how a prince should rule his state. Machiavelli describes his beliefs on the most efficient way for a prince to rule and remain in power and validates his arguments by referencing historical examples and using metaphors. One of the most prominent themes of The Prince is fortune. When speaking of fortune, Machiavelli is referring to luck, fate, or chance. He applies this concept to princes and principalities. Fortune can be either useful or advantageous, or it can be harmful or dangerous. Machiavelli believes that fortune controls half of one's life and the other half is controlled by one's own talent.Machiavelli argues that someone can gain power through his own ability or by good fortune. Good fortune could possibly come in the form of being born into power, buying power, or being assigned a governmental position. Machiavelli believes that it is very easy to come into power with fortune but very difficult to come into power with one's own ability. On the other hand, staying in power after acquiring it by fortune is very difficult whereas staying in power after acquiring it by virtue is rather simple. Machiavelli supposes this because people who have come into power with fortune "rest simply on the will and fortune of whoever has given a state to …show more content…
This discontent may compel the public to dislike the prince. Therefore, Machiavelli cautions princes and rulers to always appear to be virtuous to the public. He even gives an example to prove that he is indeed correct in his assertion. He states that "Alexander VI never did anything, nor ever thought of anything, but how to deceive men, and he always found a subject to whom he could do it"

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote "The Qualities of the Prince" in July 1513 in Florence, Italy, to convey his idea of the strong, active, and perfect ruler to the current ruling the Medicis. The work is remembered and responsible for bringing “Machiavellian” into wide usage as a pejorative term. The essay takes a stringent position on the proper way to govern a nation. With a straightforward logic, a relevant idea, and an expressed method, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” is a practical guide for current…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli and Socrates Would Not Support the Same Prince While both Socrates and Niccolo Machiavelli grew up in times of political turmoil and economic instability, Socrates would not be supportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a good prince. Their concepts of an effective ruler are completely different – the extent of their similarities are their experiences with political fragmentation and war. Both aim to establish a long-lasting government, but Machiavelli believes a ruthless ruler without regard to morality is needed, while Socrates would suggest a virtuous ruler is vital to establishing a stable government. In The Prince And the Discourses, Machiavelli articulates what makes a good ruler and provides guidelines for how they should rule.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does Machiavelli condone any strategy to attain and maintain power? Why or why not?…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli recommended princes do whatever necessary to secure their rule, and he suggested they take certain corrupt, sinful measures to do so. Machiavelli is both pessimistic and pragmatic, and his approach to governing a state is cunning. Through its unorthodox and morally questionable stances on virtue, violence, and religion, The Prince challenged the political and religious status quo in…

    • 1829 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli struggles with the problem of why one person succeeds and another fails, even though they have employed the same methods, or why totally different method can arrive at the same outcome. To explain this, he proposes that success comes when virtu is suited to the particular situation a prince finds himself in. Machiavelli envisions fortune as set of constantly changing circumstances in which particular actions can bring about success or failure. To describe it, he uses one of his few extended metaphors, making fortune a force of nature, like a river that seems uncontrollable, yet can be tamed and directed by human activity. If the Italian princes had made suitable preparations, the "flood" of foreign invasions would not have swept…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The pronouncement told by Lord Acton, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” has a great meaning to it. This pronouncement simply means that he who has an enormous amount of power will most likely become corrupt. When a person becomes…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The notion of freedom discussed in both Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince and Martin Luther’s The Freedom of a Christian is one that shares considerable likeness. While Machiavelli and Luther describe freedom in different contexts, one political and the other theological, both The Prince and The Freedom of a Christian preach that freedom is at the same time a marvelous gift and tool, for the wholeness of the state and for the individual. Moreover, freedom is to not be controlled or puppeteered by other men, and be free to exercise one’s own will, performing actions that are one’s own.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Machiavelli's Power

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When studying law and government many professors imply that for the most part, people in power want their power. That means any person with a high position in government like rulers, kings, judges, and presidents will do anything to maintain their power. In Machiavelli’s work, The Prince, believe that to maintain power is “to learn to be able not to be good, and to use this and not use it according to necessity” (Machiavelli 70). What he is trying to apply when saying “not to be good” is stating…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humanism And The Prince

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, political and social structures were drastically altered by the concept that that humans can achieve, on their own, without having to rely on God. This concept is also known as humanism. During the Renaissance a man named Niccolo Machiavelli wrote The Prince. The Prince was a document that taught people at the time how they could achieve to gain power, A specific excerpt from chapter twenty-five of this document, “ I hold it true that Fortune is the arbiter of one-half of our actions, but that she still leaves us to direct the other half, or perhaps a little less.” This excerpt basically explains that chance comes into play only some of the time in your life, but in order to obtain your goals…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli also addresses the fact that a leader should be strong toward his subjects and free of compassion or mercy. Ultimately, leaders should strive to put themselves before anything else. Despite the fact that this outlook seems harsh, it is important to remember that Machiavelli wanted the prince to thrive in his position and avoid failure at all costs. Consequently, the fate and well-being of the people are of unimportance compared to that of the ruler’s…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When we hear the word “Machiavellian”, we often connect that term to an immoral cynical disregard for the purpose of personal gain, but we should not assume that Niccolò Machiavelli had that intention of creating this idea. In the Republic of Florence of 1513, Machiavelli published “The Prince”, laying down the first foundation for modern political philosophy, and addressing the concerns of how people can achieve and maintain civil society. With the right virtue, physical arms, people, and opportunity, people can compel themselves to bring about principality. To bring about change in the name of the people, using just violence mindlessly will not work, nor will truth or message alone will work.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Machiavelli and Socrates both lived during times of uncertainty, political fragmentation and violence, their philosophies about how the state should conduct itself are in direct contrast with one another. Machiavelli’s the Prince is founded on the principal that if a ruler wishes to maintain power, he should embody the ideology of pragmatism, while Socrates believes the state should follow him in his commitment to moral purity and justice. The inherent dissonance between these philosophies would lead Socrates to be unsupportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a prince, and consequently the political system Machiavelli would recommend he install, despite his apparent change in rhetoric from the Apology to the Crito. Throughout Plato’s interpretation…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas that Machiavelli displays are the true ideals of the era, however, the irony and satire surrounding how they are presented are not genuine: ““Any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good. Hence a prince who wants to keep his authority must learn how not to be good, and use that knowledge, or refrain from using it, as necessity requires” (Machiavelli). Machiavelli is revealing to the reader that in order for a prince to do a good job, he must lie to his subjects in order to be successful. He continues to be ironic and poke fun at the system in play and proves that these thoughts of the prince are not genuine. The beliefs that correspond with those of the era that are presented in The Prince are a strong ruling body in order to maintain social order:“Machiavelli, in the world we have described, often holds qualities like liberality, affability, generosity, courage, sincerity, gravity, and faith, to be of no more or less political value than their opposites, except in communication”(Moore).…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This book set forth the most efficient way to gain and maintain power during the Renaissance. His tactics included ideals such as: the ends justify the means, take calculated risks and rule without ethical thought. Many of the Medici ruling strategies were incredibly similar to those written in Machiavelli’s book; therefore, the actions of the Medici family directly exemplified the advice Machiavelli provided in The Prince.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays