Negligence Pifer Case Brief

Decent Essays
Rule of Law: People who suffer from liability due to the negligence from the other people can sue/claim damages.

Facts: Donald Pifer (P) a neighbor of Sue Muse (D) saw flames coming from her house. Pifer went to investigate Muse property and thought he saw a body lying on a bed. Pifer decided to enter the window to assume he is rescuing a person. However, Pifer was struck by a bullet and was seriously injured. Pifer brought a suit against Muse seeking to recover damages for personal injuries.

Issue: Can the plaintiff provide that they were directly injured/harm due to neglect activity of the defendant?

Opinion and Decision: The court decided that the summary judgment was proper for this case.
• Muse’s action for leaving the candle

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Dorrough V. Wilkes (2002)

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This case displayed an unintentional tort that involved negligence on the part of the defendant and his care of the deceased. On May 18, 1994, Emanuel Wilkes, Sr. and Emanuel Wilkes, Jr. (the plaintiff’s) filed a complaint against Dr. Charles M. Dorrough, Jr (the defendant), and Boliver County Hospital (BCH) which alleged that…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Facts and Procedural History: Once the individual, Graham, realized the commencement of a low insulin is being reacted, he had the inclination to purchase an orange juice to thwart the low insulin reaction. Upon arriving the convenience store where he spotted a line of customers waiting for their turn at the checkout line. Graham rushed out of the store without paying for the content. An officer spotted the swift activity and decided to do an investigative stop and called for backup.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bordenkecher Case Summary

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ms. Bordenkecher’s reliance upon materials outside the pleadings to argue that Plaintiffs’ claims are unsustainable demonstrate that Defendant seeks summary judgment from this Court, despite its claim to the contrary. Under the Maryland rules, when a defendant files a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and matters outside the pleadings are presented to and considered by the court, “the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 2-501.” MD. RULE 2-322(c) (emphasis added). The reason for this rule is that with a motion to dismiss the court considers only the allegations in the complaint to determine if the facts alleged by the plaintiff sufficiently state a recognized cause of action.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tort Law Case Study

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From Sweethearts to Sour Tarts, Millionaire Matchmaker Sued The dating scene has changed dramatically over the course of a few years. With more people having access to the internet, online dating is no longer something the desperate or insecure; everybody is dating online. As more people date online, the need to weed out the bad apples from those people who are truly looking for love becomes obvious. When it comes to people who have money, they pay elite matchmakers to weed out the individuals who may not be compatible with them.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finkenbiner Case Summary

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Finkenbiner 1 MCCLESKEY V. KEMP Emma Finkenbiner Block 7 Mr. Moore 20 April 2015 Finkenbiner 2 McCleskey v. Kemp was a Supreme Court case in 1897.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Illinois has a modified comparative negligence structure in that the plaintiff’s claim is barred if the jury finds that the plaintiff’s comparative negligence is more than fifty percent. Instruction B45.01 of the Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions informs the jury of this rule of law and this has been shown to discourage juries from finding plaintiffs more than fifty percent at fault for their injuries. If the jury determines that plaintiff’s comparative negligence to be fifty percent or less, then the amount of the verdict is reduced by the same percentage as the plaintiff’s comparative negligence. Based upon the investigation that we have been able to complete to date, we believe that a jury will allocate the majority of liability against…

    • 1263 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence or Malpractice? The burden of proof lies with the plaintiff. I have spent the last ten years as a paralegal and dealing with all kinds of cases. During those ten years, we represented plaintiffs and defendants.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the night of October 5, 2012, Taylor Hamilton was driving his mother’s Lincoln Town car to P-Cubed. As he was driving down Nash Street, the plaintiff, Alex Cooper dashed from the woods, without looking, wearing a dark hoodie and jeans. He ran into the first lane of traffic before running in front of Taylor Hamilton’s car and being struck. Hamilton was unable to see Cooper before she dashed onto the street because the poor lighting and Cooper’s dark clothing. As soon as Hamilton saw Cooper, he slammed the brakes, but it was too late.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Negligence is consider tort and is a civil wrong committed against the person that the court remedies in the form of action for damages occurred such compensation. Negligence is the unintentional commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person would or would not do. It is a form of conduct which is caused by the carelessness of the standard of care on reasonable members of the society; In the medical field it is consider malpractice. The person who shows negligence does not use their best judgment against possible risk. For example, in the case Dr. Haskins did not examine Kelly nor review his chart.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Muller V. Oregon Summary

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Muller v. Oregon (1908) Facts: Curt Muller was convicted of violating Oregon labor laws, by making a female employee in his Laundromat work longer than ten hours in a single workday. Procedural History: Muller appealed his conviction to the Oregon Supreme Court, which upheld the original conviction. The case then was brought before the U.S. Supreme Court. Issue: Whether Oregon’s labor law which prohibited women from working longer than ten hours in a single work day interferes with the freedom of contract, an implied right under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment? Holding: No…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    41/12 The first report stated the future care cost to be $582,128.81. The supplemental report cost is $612,542.86. His opinions are the same in both reports. 43/23 The Plaintiff was accompanied by her husband during Dr. Gonzales’ examination of her.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Savitri Bhama

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plaintiff Savitri Bhama and defendant Rajendra Bhama were married until they got a divorce in 1977, they both are psychiatrists. While married they had two kids together. After the divorce custody of both kids was given to Savitri. Which led to a custody battle between the defendant and the plaintiff. In 1981, custody of both children was given to the defendant.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hence the plaintiff shall claim damages under the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s 3b , which is in respect of an intentional act that is done with intention to cause injury or death. In order to successfully sue the defendants for the loss of earnings, Benji must establish the following three basics elements of negligence as defined by Gibson and Fraser (9th Edition) : 1. Does the defendant owe a duty of care to the plaintiff? Duty of care could be established from the neighbor’s test from Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, where it states that your neighbor is any person who is so closely and directly affected by what you do (the idea of proximity). Furthermore, it can be concluded from Fraser v Johnston (1990)…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Requirements and Potential Defenses to Myra’s Claim Robyn Broadwater Kaplan University October 18, 2016 MEMORANDUM Date: October 18, 2016 To: Candie Cardigan, CEO, CARDWARE Inc. From: Robyn Broadwater Re: Negligence Requirements and Potential Defenses to Myra’s Claim ______________________________________________________________________________…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medical Negligence Clinicians evaluate and treat multiple cases on a daily basis. While some cases are simple, other cases are very complex and demand an extensive evaluation, including detailed history taking, and meticulous examination. A case of a 38 year-old female with apparent symptoms of pneumonia was presented. The patient was obese and had initially presented to her primary care physician (PCP) with symptoms of an upper respiratory tract infection. She had been 8 weeks post-partum and had required two days of hospitalization after her delivery due to a severe hemorrhage.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays