Justice In David Hume's Understation Of Justice

Improved Essays
David Hume’s understating of justice is that the nature of human being is to be tended to his self-interest rather than acting according to just for others, which means in order to act in just it should not crush with his interests and to gain more with the common justice. He refers the progress of the rules of justice to a sense of common self-interest of occurring justice when he used the unordinary method which displays the existence of justice in social utility and the development of human being in order to understand the morality of justice. His method of skepticism influenced the awareness of morality's soul in the way that self-love, when it acts at its liberty, rather than of engaging us to honest actions, is where all injustice and violence come from. Conventions, this is what Hume refers to as the source of justice, as he mentioned in his writings that a person is for sure not bound to a promise he gave if conflicts with the interests, but at the same time if …show more content…
But the applause of the moral of justice produces the moral duty to justice. As people contemplate in justice done by others, we understand immediately the prejudice done to the person who suffered the injustice and to human society in general. Our sympathy with public utility makes us condemn the injustice done by the actions of others and, progressively, also the injustice we make when we “sympathize with others in the sentiments they entertain of us”. Conversely, we morally approve of just actions because of their social

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Where Singer's guideline dictates, “If it is in our power to prevent something very bad happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral significance we ought to do it” (147). Narveson withstands that there is a division between principles in the abstract to be weighted against potential outcomes and policies that are “pursued in the real world, (where) facts cannot be ignored” (145). Further, what we are committed to do (justice) and what might be ethically virtuous for us to do, charity. Resisting arguments that we should compel others into action, Narveson states that while it is virtuous to aid to others, it is never it is never morally tolerable to force someone to be charitable. Charity depends on empathy and is an activity that flows from the heart.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers have long argued about the correct way to organize a group of people to maximize safety, happiness, and order. John Stuart Mill and Plato, two prominent philosophers of their respective eras, created contradicting theories on how best to create a flourishing society. Although their theories are different, Mill and Plato both focus on the roles of people in society. Mill specifically believes that people should act in ways that promote self-benefit while avoiding harming another person (2002, p. 8).…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice approach stems from the Aristotelian philosophy where it is stated that “equals should be treated equally and unequals unequally”. The justice model of ethical decision-making can be described as “moral obligation to act on the basis of fair adjudication between competing claims. Hence, when making the decision, the individual should assess how fair the action will be and if it could potentially discriminate and show favouritism. Discrimination by definition “imposes burden on people who are no different from those on whom burden are not imposed”. Favouritism, on the other hand, provides benefits to a certain group of people, without a justifiable reason.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccaleer V. Horsey 35 Md

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages

    [N]either the common law nor any code of human law seeks to enforce the rule of perfect morality declared by divine authority, which acknowledges as its one principle the duty of doing to others as we would that others should do to us, and which, by consequence, absolutely excludes and prohibits all cunning and craft or astuteness practiced by any one for his own exclusive benefit. And it thence follows that a certain amount of selfish cunning passes unrecognized by Courts of justice, and that a man may procure to himself, in his dealings with others, some advantages to which he has no moral right, but to which he may succeed in establishing a perfect legal title. But if any one carries this too far: if by craft and selfish contrivance he inflicts an injury upon his neighbor and acquires a benefit to himself beyond a certain point.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Glaucon Vs Socrates

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Imagine a man that always donate clothes and feeds the homeless. This man regularly visits children with terminal illnesses and is one of the largest donors to Susan G. Komen for the Cure non-profit organization. He is viewed by tens of thousands as a saint, heaven sent or a reincarnation of Jesus himself. A just man in the eyes of many, but this man has twisted dark secrets; which involve human trafficking, murder of any competitor and extortion of politicians. The man is an unjust person by nature but is viewed as just.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For centuries many individuals have questioned the true mean of social justice as depicted by the law. For instincts social ordered structure and misrepresentations of citizens are issues that should be attended to by individuals in power. Although at times this might be impossible because those in power are manipulated by corruption, causing many of us to feel the lack of social status. William Shakespeare’s “Measure for Measure” is a perfect example of power and corruption. Also would an individual has a right to declare themselves merciful in any given situation?…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Glaucon's View Of Justice

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Morality and justice are among the most important philosophical constructs that have continued to influence thinking, as well as approach to contemporary issues. Different philosophers have studied justice through definition, application in society, and the associated arguments. Socrates, for instance, argued that people prefer justice intrinsically because it has better promises and consequences than injustice. The Ring of Gyges is a critical review and challenge of Socrates’ version of justice, as put forward by Glaucon.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Are humans being decent? Or do we act just because we have no choice? Well, that is the logic behind the famous story of the Ring of Gyges. The Ring of Gyges was a challenge poses by Glaucon to Socrates. Glaucon wanted to rend Socrates defenseless against injustice, and that was not only his intentions.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When any decision is made the most important factor determining its conclusion is its justice. This justice is what is of question when concluding its accuracy, whether it is moral or just another human-made law. There are many writers thought history and from those Sophocles, Martin Luther King and Immanuel Kant will be discussed upon. These writers offered various conclusions upon what is the just and the unjust.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The sentiment of justice, in that one of its elements which consists of desire to punish is thus, I conceive, the natural feeling of retaliation or vengeance, rendered by intellect and sympathy applicable to those injuries, that is, to those hurts,…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem set 2 1.) What, according to the theory developed by Glaucon in Republic II, is justice? Why and in what sense is it good to be just person, and bad to be an unjust person? According to the theory developed by Glaucon, justice is the case where people agreed to be good to each other, so that not to end up in a chaos.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Justice. It is at the heart and soul of the American ideology. We believe there is no such thing as a civil society without it. We fought a revolution to free ourselves from the laws of an unjust king.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Curtis “Stickman” Brummitt Looking at the history of humanity, one can see that we are a people whom claim to have strong ties to morality, with the ability to actively determine right and wrong, yet every day we stray further and further from the rightness we so often claim to possess. Poets and writers, already known for criticizing humanity for its every flaw, have unsurprisingly leapt at the opportunity to again berate humans for their disregard for doing the right thing. “We must cultivate our garden.” The final crew in Voltaire’s Candide meet up with a wise, normal Muslim man near the end of the book.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pain and punishment are two words that interweave with each other in accordance with criminal justice. However, the way an individual is able to interpret these words can develop very different, and influential forms of thinking. Nevertheless, these developed forms of thinking allow individuals to form opinions on the subject, and aid in the formation our state. In this essay I am going to be explaining both Immanuel Kant, and Jeremy Bentham’s individual stances on punishment. This will include the theories of retributivism, and deterrence as leading factors to explain each theory.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Form Of Beauty Essay

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Self-predication: the Form of Beauty is itself beautiful. But this is different from the way in which all other beautiful things are beautiful. Every other beautiful thing is beautiful because it ‘participates in’ the Form of Beauty; but the Form simply is beautiful. It is what it is in virtue of itself.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays