Letting People In Absolute Poverty Die Analysis

Good Essays
Moller’s argument in letting people in absolute poverty die is akin to a large scale, real-life optimization problem. He believes we should covet our resources and let them grow to help the largest amount of people possible instead of using it to help presently suffering people. The main argument against his thesis revolves around the psychology of letting people die whom you know you can help. Moller believes that future people, those “statistical lives,” are just as important as presently existing people. However, most will not allow presently existing people to die even if they know their actions will be justified through future aid. There will always be future possible people in developing countries who need aid, therefore the supposed …show more content…
The simplest principle believes that when you have two or more options that can result in saving some people, you must perform the option with the higher probability of saving someone. The application of this principle lies in increasing your funds for future donating ability. The Sure-Thing Rescue Principle would rather save a certain number of people now, (because the probability of helping them is near one hundred percent) than wait for money to build up and help an uncertain number of people in the future. The probability of helping people goes down when you are waiting for money to build. Even if you are the top Wall Street stock broker, you could still make a mistake. The risk when investing in stocks or bonds is always present, and instead of gaining money to help more people, you could end up losing it. Thus, waiting to donate was useless and you merely wasted your time. The Sure-Thing Rescue Principles are more concerned with the probability of saving people rather than the time it takes to do the saving. Moral Urgency Principles are concerned with time, and they prefer you save people sooner. Considering that the Rescue Principles are flawed, using them to comprehensively counter-argue the Letting Die Thesis would be very difficult. The Rescue Principles do not care how many people are saved or the time involved in the act of saving, if the probability is high then you should perform …show more content…
If this were not the case and the poverty trend was growing, Moller’s argument would be defeated. This is shown in the Ever-More Rescue Paradox, where the amount of people in need would steadily increase instead of decrease over time. Instead of saving more people to lessen the reach of poverty, you would be helping the same ratio of people in the initial amount of money and after waiting for your funds to increase. Waiting in this case is futile, because there would still be the same number of people in poverty if you donated at the beginning versus if you donated in fifty years. This also calls up the difficulty of when to remove your money from the stocks. There is no point of equilibrium available to know when to stop investing. If you graphed the lines of people absolute poverty and the value of your investment they would be very nearly parallel, meaning they would never cross. Thus, you would be stuck continually waiting for your money to increase while more people fall into absolute poverty. The demand for aid is much greater than the supply of aid, and nothing will balance out because they are both increasing at nearly the same

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    If the amount of money people make at the lowest level begins to increase, so will the mid and high level paying jobs will also have to be paid more creating inflation. Inflation is not something that we need more of as it will make the US dollar weaker against other currency and what a dollar is worth now after raising minimum wage it will only be worth a fraction of what it is now. Inflating the dollar will not help the situation of poverty because then people will be making more money, but that money will not be worth as much. When the cost finally takes over and businesses close instead of making 7.25 minimum wage or whatever they raise it to they will be earning nothing. By trying to fix our problem there is a thin line between what will help and what could end up doing more harm than good and even possibly pushing us into another recession.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Minimum Wage Madness

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    But with wage boost come job cuts. Hundreds of thousands jobs could be lost in the first year (Wilson). Loss of jobs will mean people will have no source of getting money, leading to poverty. If minimum wage increased to $12 it would lead to increased poverty rates (Wilson). Keeping the minimum wage low will help keep the job market open and will keep people off the streets.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mutual Fund Rating Essay

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages

    People too scared or uninformed to invest actually loss money due to inflation, while people who rely on simplified ratings systems on receive lackluster gains. Understanding how to invest is a crucial skill that will allow you to ignore articles such as this one and to avoid being flustered by market news. Being able to cut costs while simultaneously increase income allows people to…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Minimum Wage Rejection

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Supporters say it will help the economy but the facts just are not there. A minimum wage increase will only help a handful of people and the people it will help are not the people who need it. What people do not realize about increasing wages is that it will raise the cost of living at an even faster rate. An increase will also make the value of the dollar go down and there will be inflation, causing the cost of goods to go up, making a minimum wage increase irrelevant because workers will be right back to where they started. Higher wages will make it harder for people to get jobs and that is not helping the unemployment issue.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Over time, we can see improvements in the economy and our debt may even decrease along the way. The main reason the government does not want this type of monetary system, is because it will limit them in how much they can spend because then they cannot rely on printing more money for them to spend. People may also think that with gold in the system, people will hoard their gold and the amount of money that is available will go down meaning that the prices will go down, as well causing deflation. However, reduction in prices are very good for the consumers. Suede says “I don’t know about you, but when prices fall, I tend to buy more goods, not less.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tax Deficit Essay

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first example is rather than raise the tax, why not raise the age of retirement. This is definitely a valid point and could help fix the issue of social security, but happen if people continue and continue to live longer; we could be in the same boat in the future. Another argument is that increase would be that we longer need social security because people have 401k and can invest their own money for retirement. While this is also a good argument, you could say that it is a little risky to do this. There are also many people who do not know enough about stocks and investing.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Betting Vs Bookies

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is your guarantee of future wealth. People without emergency funds will become strapped for cash at some point, usually because of unforeseen bills or accidents. They then have to sell their investments quickly and take massive losses just so that they may get to their money. You need an emergency fund to help ensure this never happens to you, or you are really going to struggle to build wealth in the long term. Do not be silly and put 20% of the net from your wages into your emergency fund.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Raising the minimum wage sounds like a good idea on the surface, but it could ultimately lead to a decrease in jobs for young people. Those who are able to maintain their jobs would receive higher wages if the minimum wage was increased; however, companies would be forced to compensate for the increase of labor costs. Columnist Rebecca Zissou notes that, "[t]o offset higher wages, [businesses] say they would have to. . .…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A productive society produces a surplus of wealth. The only logical way to get rid of that wealth is through war. You cannot give the surplus to the masses because there will always be some people that don’t benefit from spending the surplus that way. If people feel the surplus is not being spend equally they will become upset. If the masses had more money they might feel the need for more leisure time and to become more educated.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    You also have to imagine what would happen to stock prices and the market in general if every adult was investing into the top companies. Would this cause America to grow or fail much quicker? Would this cause some companies to increase worth and others to fall out of the market? In my opinion, the finance industry will benefit many but at the end of the day its main goal is to move money around to maximize its’ worth and not ours. We as individuals are on the bottom of the totem pole in the…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays