Milgram's Studies Of Obedience Essay

Decent Essays
Moreover, I will ASSESS the reason why people CONFORM by using MILGRAM’S studies and also gauge MILGRAM’S studies of obedience. Also Iwill DELIBERATE the influence of minority influence on society. I will now need to evaluate weather Milgram’s studies are countenance through the evidence of reasons given for why people obey.
Conformity refers to the act of changing of a particular belief or individual’s behaviour involving the pressure of social norms or expectations. “yielding to group pressures” (Crutchfield),1996). Group pressures can be demonstrated into many ways this include bullying, criticism, persuasion etc. conformity exists into two categories these are NORMATIVE AND INFORMATIONAL CONFORMITY.To start off with normative is usually generate by a need to fit in, in other to be like and accepted whereas informational conformity occurs because of the desire to be correct. Also, obedience as a direct form of social influence, in which one person orders another to do something. for example, work place if you don’t follow the roles given by the manger you will face the ………Research shows that signifies that people will obey orders from a figure of authority even when this lead to committing immoral acts. Obedience differs from
…show more content…
Some People conform to a view because they believe it to be correct. People change their opinion because of various reason such as roles, status, background and familiarity. Whereas normative social influence is most commonly with compliance going along with the majority even if accept their beliefs because you wanted to be accepted. Normative influence is when majority are able to control others by wielding pressure on them to conform. Because majority people have superior power they can use it very effortlessly. For example, the majority could make the minority feel rough about discordant, as we see in Asch’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The goal of this paper is to review and analyze the article written by Stanley Milgram in 1963. This experiment was considered to be one of the most acknowledged research in the history of social psychology that revealed the unpredicted side of human nature. The author described the tendencies of obedience as inevitable part of our lives, particularly since we live in the complex systems of society where human interaction is unavoidable. He illustrated that this specific tendencies of human behavior was extremely relevant at this specific time in history, during which millions of innocent lives had systematically been lost through wars and fascist movements. It is clearly evident that the author became deeply curious about the nature of “obedience”…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram proposed that people operate on two levels. First, they operate as autonomous individuals, where they act according to their own values and beliefs. Second, they act on an agentic level where they see themselves as agents, acting on behalf of somebody else and not responsible for their own actions. He asserted that it is possible to move from an autonomous state into an agentic state; this is referred to as an agentic shift (Milgram, 1963). A consequence of this shift is that an individual no longer feels responsible for their actions.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    "Obedience is as basic an element in the structure of social life as one can point to," says Stanley Milgram in his essay, "The Perils of Obedience" (Milgram 78). As he prepared to conduct a more extreme case of analyzing obedience in which test subjects would read off a group of words while the "learner," who was an actor, would have to pair the two correct words together, only to be shocked in an electric chair if they failed, Milgram hypothesized that the test subjects would listen to their conscience and disobey the immoral orders to continue the experiment (Milgram 79). After testing forty original subjects, Milgram was rather surprised at the outcome: although many subjects argued about continuing, when given the satisfaction that the outcome of the learner was not the subject's responsibility but the…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiment in “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram, Yale psychologist, has triggered many responses to the question of an individual’s willingness to obey and the credibility of the experiment he performed. Ian Parker, a regular writer for the New Yorker and common voice in other political/scientific compositions, has come to the table with his opinion and outside sources to discuss the facts of Milgram’s experiment and its consequences in his essay, “Obedience.” Milgram claims through his experiment on obedience we can logically determine an idea of the thought processes of the Nazis (Milgriam 89). This experiment arrived at the conclusion that people are surprisingly obedient to a legitimate authority figure even when the orders…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Society trusts those that conform, and distrusts those that that don’t. By conforming to society's expectation, you gain trust from the society. A disadvantage to conforming to society is when you join the group, you’re technically no longer your own individual. George S. Patton once said, “If everyone is thinking alike, then sobody isn’t thinking.” It’s like you’re a sheep, and when you conform to society's beliefs, you join the rest of the herd.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on Milgram’s experiment he uncovered that “For many people, obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency, indeed a potent impulse overriding training in ethics, sympathy, and moral conduct” (691). Most Germans carried out the…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    TYRANNY is motivated by love, not obedience For years, researchers tried to name the factors that lead people to commit cruel acts. Probably the most famous example of such attempt was a study done by Stanley Milgram, who concluded that almost any person could commit a tyranny if given an order to do so. This has been a standard view on tyranny for almost over 50 years. However, new evidence shows that there is an alternative explanation for Milgram’s findings.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article "The Perils of Obedience," Stanley Milgram describes what, in his opinion, was an ethical experiment performed at Yale University designed to test how ordinary people respond to authority figures' direct orders, even if the orders violate the test subjects' conscience. In order to prevent psychological damage, Milgram's test subjects were reconciled with their victims after the experiment was terminated; he also claims there was an attempt to reduce tensions that resulted from the experiment (Baumrind 92). Overall, Milgram's findings led him to believe that people struggle to resist orders from authority figures for fear of disappointing said figure, and that a person will assume responsibility for their actions so long as they…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    If it was possible for one to take a step back from the world and watch every event in human history unfold, one would be given the notion that humans, as imperfect beings, are unsettlingly fond of committing horrendous crimes against their fellow men. Germans oversaw the systematic extermination of six million of their Jewish brethren during World War II (8), and Cambodia's Khmer Rouge regime purposefully executed two million of the country’s own citizens in the 1970s (9). These two examples are from the twentieth century alone; in reality earth’s history of genocides is far more extensive than most individuals would like to give it credit. At a first glance at human history, one might pose the question, “How are ordinary people capable of…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people are driven to get the acceptance of their peers. Conformity means changing behavior in accordance with socially accepted conventions or standards. While non conformity is the complete opposite. Since it gives them the feeling of acceptance acknowledgement, conformists choose to stay the same as society. However, the nonconformist chooses their lifestyle because it gives them feelings of happiness and passion which is one of the main reasons to live.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Wherever one may go in this world they find obedience. The location or the culture of the area does not matter to the similarity of your findings, all will relate one way, and that is through the mindset of obedience. One will see obedience from pets to owners, parents to children, and even spouse to spouse with how they submit themselves to each other. The Author’s Stanley Milgram, Norimitsu Onishi, Martin Fackler, Po Bronson, Ashley Merryman, Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, and Lynn H. Nicholas will all contribute to this research based analysis on behalf of the analysis of obedience itself. Stanley Milgram was a Yale psychologist who is highly praised for his shocking study on obedience, and high pressure situations.…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film “Heathers” illustrates numerous social psychology themes. This coming of age film, starring Winona Ryder and Christian Slater, uses crude humor and terrible 80’s fashion to make murdering your peers and stopping your ex-lover from blowing the school up entertaining. This film emphasizes social psychological themes such as stereotypes and prejudice, group influence, and conformity and obedience. Stereotypes played a huge rule in this film. In the beginning of the film you see The Heathers giving their weekly lunchtime poll.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays