Marx, And Nietzsche: Competition And The Nature Of Human Society

Improved Essays
Competition and the Nature of Human Society in the Views of Marx, Darwin, and Nietzsche Three of the most influential, but extremely controversial, writers of the 19th and 20th centuries were Karl Marx, Charles Darwin and Friedrich Nietzsche. The philosophical, scientific, economic and social impact of their ideas is still felt in the 21st century. Without a doubt, Marx’s The Communist Manifesto altered the course of history by changing the governments and societies of Russia and many other countries. Charles Darwin’s, The Origin of the Species and The Descent of Man, generated scientific and religious debates that eventually led to the famous Scopes Trial and issues of creationism versus evolution. Friedrich Nietzsche’s, On the Genealogy of Morals and The Gay Science, proclaimed, “God is dead” and put forth his modernist ideas on morality. These three writers …show more content…
The manufacturing system led to modern industry and world markets. Even with all these changes, Marx still saw society as the oppressor and the oppressed. He identified the oppressor as the Bourgeoisie capitalists and the oppressed as the Proletariat workers. Marx stated, “We see, therefore, how the modern bourgeoisie is itself the product of a long course of development, of a series of revolutions in the modes of production and of exchange” (287). In his opinion, the “modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie” (287). Marx believed that the bourgeoisie had changed human society and had created many evils within family relations and the larger society. He identified many new forms of competition: dissatisfaction with old products and the desire for new products from global markets; civilization overpowering smaller nations; urbanization versus rural life; centralized government versus smaller independent provinces; man bringing Nature under his control through technology; and a new form of master and slave

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Nietzsche was a very critical philosopher in his time. He believed that normative systems in other words, what we believe as morals are derived similarly with varied meanings and values over time. Morals and practices are often associated with cultures. They claim that morals are entirely different in cultures and are not universal in human society. He basically viewed how judgements on cultured morals are relativist claims of others than themselves (Chapter 31, page…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Marx, the bourgeoisie class controlled the manufacturing system and established “new conditions of oppression” to control the proletariat (Marx, 159-160). Therefore, a class struggle existed and it was worsening for the proletariat class as the bourgeoisie were “constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society” (Marx, 161). However, for Marx, the exploitation of the proletariat for capital will not continue as the bourgeoisie are digging their own graves by continuing to oppress the working class (Marx, 169). Also, in contrast to Nietzsche who says that the slaves are weak and hopeless, Marx does not consider the proletariat as inherently weak. In fact, Marx is clear in stating that the “fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable” especially with the increase in the proletariat’s revolutionary consciousness (Marx, 169).…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The new dominance of the bourgeoisie created a social class within the bourgeoisie, and thus the proletariat emerged (4-5). These “wage-laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live” (1). The creation of the proletariat was a necessary affect to bourgeoisie’s approaches of production- a superiority complex and divide for struggle naturally came about between the owners of the production and the working force (6). The bourgeois industries expanded and increased their own capital, leaving the lower class unable to compete; Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time” (6). This dissonance eventually caused corrosion within the structure of the proletariat, and this struggle created the revolutionary element which eventually destroyed the bourgeois oppressors: “What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Communist Manifesto, Marx believes that the working class will overthrow the ruling capitalist class. During the Industrial Revolution in England, the two classes that become defined is the bourgeoisie, which are considered middle class and the proletariat, which are the working class. The modern industry and large capitalists took over small businesses owners, and these groups of people become part of the working class. The proletariat class is large in size compared to the bourgeoisie therefore; wages decrease for manual labor workers while profits increase for capitalist. He believed that the influence of the capitalist extended beyond where the good is produced and into many countries because this is the only way for them to increase their profits.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Nietzsche and Marx challenge the dominant ideas in their societies. For Nietzsche, the dominate idea was Christian morality, and for Marx, capitalistic ideology. Two people differentiate in their ways of argument and intentions of arguments. By comparing the nobles and everyone else and explaining bad conscience, meaning the feeling of duty and obligation, as an evolved inwards punishment from which people enjoy themselves, Nietzsche points out the petty past of the widely embraced Christian ascetic morality. Also through describing his naturalistic origin of religion, Nietzsche argues that God is only a creation of humans.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx still advocates for a communist state, but he changes his view on private property. Marx now view production as the source of class relations. It is because of the bourgeoise owning the means of production that labor is exploited, and surplus is extracted. By moving the means of production to public property rather than private, Marx seeks to ensure that workers are compensated for the product of their labor. Wolfson does not provide a sufficient explanation to Marx’s change in mind.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the nineteenth century industrialization lead to new views of science and politics that were deemed revolutionary in nature. During this period Europeans believed science was capable of revealing secrets of the natural world, in turn revealing ways to improve human society through rational inquiry. Two important people that stood out during the Europeans industrial age were Karl Marx and Charles Darwin. Both of these men developed new ways of processing knowledge that significantly altered previous ways of thinking. As Marx analyzed capitalism and expanded on the idea of inevitability of socialist revolution, he developed a systematic framework for exploration of human history.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Darwin and Marx were detractors of Malthus’ theory that society would eventually be decimated by disease and famine, which simultaneously contradicted the theories of evolution and self-perfection. Marx stated that, “Darwin’s work is most important and suits my purpose in that it provides a basis in natural science for the historical class struggle.” Marx took Darwin’s theories of natural selection and survival of the fittest and combined with Pierre Trémaux to apply the principles to history and politics. Marx explained that history and the evolution of politics is shown through the natural selection of economic systems. Marx, like Darwin, took Hegel’s views of dialectical idealism, and applied it to a more materialistic and realistic world.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1), Marx divides the society in two main parts: 1) The bourgeoisie which is the class of modern capitalists who are the owners of all the elements necessary to the social production, and employers of wage labor; 2) The proletariat which represents all those laborers who work for a wage, and do not have means of production of their own, and, therefore, are forced to offer their labor power in order to live. “The value of laboring power is determined by the value of the necessaries required to produce, develop, maintain, and perpetuate the laboring power” (Marx, “Economic Manuscripts: Value, Price and Profit”). According to this idea, during the working time, a worker spends “one part of the day covering the cost of maintaining himself and his family, while the other part of the day he works without remuneration, creating for the capitalist surplus-value, the source of profit, the source of the wealth of the capitalist class” (Lenin, “The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism”), which is one of the most important feature of Marx’s economic theory. The negative side of surplus-value is that the worker himself is crushed by the capital created by his labor, and this capital has a counter-effect and cause damage to small proprietors that cannot compete with the new system and remain unemployed.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It allows humans the ability to create meaningful relationships with others. (Applerouth/Edles, pg 29) Marx theory of history was captured in his German Ideology writings. Marx examined the German philosopher Hegel and came up with several contradictions and differences. He agreed with Hegel that successive periods of evolution were necessary for social change. Whereas Hegel believed consciousness led to social change, Marx examined the historical materialism and argued that life was determined by material and economic conditions together.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Marx, the rise of Capitalism comes from the transformation from the feudal system. This transformation occurred due to three factors: global imperialism, the emergence of civil society and the nation-state, and change in ideology (lecture 1-21). These three factors facilitated the development of mobile, free labor. There was no longer a need for a feudal lord since society was progressing towards a labor focused ideology. Specifically, “every man who wished to become a master”.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    His view explained that, due to differing economic status or society, there were differences in the human nature in different societies and classes (Wall 279). Marx’s view on human nature pinpoints economic class and societal drives as the basis of human nature. Charles Darwin held a different view on human nature. He asserted that human nature is determined by behaviors that were selected for through the process of evolution. According to this theory,…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Men,” to Marx, “developing their material production and their material intercourse, alter, along with their real existence, their thinking and the products of their thinking” (Marx 155). The importance is not in the ideas, “life is not determined by consciousness, but consciousness by life” (Marx 155). To Marx, historical materialism comes from a fundamental reality of human existence: that in order for human beings to survive and continue on from generation to generation, it is necessary for them to produce and reproduce the material requirements of life. This in and of itself changes human consciousness fundamentally and leads them to constantly revolutionize and develop their societies to best met this end. Using the ultimate example, all of history, Marx illustrates the importance of focusing on human relationships to truly understand history, thus explaining the development of class…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He sees the importance of modernity, as it promotes interdependency and a new stage in human development, the capitalist era. However, in despite some agreement with Conservative beliefs he also critiques and questions it. For example, although the Bourgeoisie are a big point to make (Marx gives them credit for the near total erasure of feudalism), Marx believes they are also unscrupulous, manipulative, greedy, and that they appropriate the desires of the masses to their interests. In controlling the means of production, the working man or woman (proletariat) are both marginalized and alienated from their work. As such, he is against aristocracy and the inheritance of land, and supports a strong regulating body to ensure…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Inequality Analysis

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He emphasizes the problem of modern society as class struggle. Marx writes that “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles… oppressor and oppressed [standing in constant opposition to one another], (473-4)” as he is dedicated to the idea that societies are born of class struggles throughout the history. With contemporary capitalism in a modern society, proletariats do not participate in voluntary activity but becomes owned by “an alien power opposed to him, which enslaves him instead of being controlled by him (160).” Proletariats, the class that earns with the labor, are forced to work under the demand of the bourgeoisie, the class that owns the means of the production. Moreover, Marx believes in the dialectical theory of history, a type of history that does not move in a linear fashion, but moves forward and changes because of the contradictions that exist at the time.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays