He elaborates that fortune is temporal instability. He claims that love falls under the category of fortune because it is stable but rather shifty. In chapter 25, he tells us that fortune controls the fate of a prince but human free will also has its effect. “I hold that it could be true that fortune is the arbiter of half of actions, but that she still leaves the other half, or close to it, to be governed by us.” Aristotle would not agree with any of this considering that he is about moderation. Machiavelli sticks to one side and doesn't sway in the
He elaborates that fortune is temporal instability. He claims that love falls under the category of fortune because it is stable but rather shifty. In chapter 25, he tells us that fortune controls the fate of a prince but human free will also has its effect. “I hold that it could be true that fortune is the arbiter of half of actions, but that she still leaves the other half, or close to it, to be governed by us.” Aristotle would not agree with any of this considering that he is about moderation. Machiavelli sticks to one side and doesn't sway in the