Machiavelli The Qualities Of The Prince Analysis

Improved Essays
Machiavelli’s Advice and its Effectiveness on Modern Politics In “The Qualities of the Prince,” Niccolò Machiavelli argues that although a prince would ideally want to be characterized as possessing the qualities of virtue and righteousness, he must also be willing to resort to actions that are immoral or deceitful in order to maintain power. Although having qualities of vice might damage the reputation of a leader temporarily, Machiavelli argues that it will lead to the rise and success of a leader in the long run. For instance, he supports the negative reputation that a leader might get from being cruel, miserly, and untruthful over the positive reputation that a leader might get from being generous, kind and trustworthy. Despite Machiavelli blatantly disregarding the civil rights of citizens, the advice that he gives is surprisingly still relevant to modern politics even after half a millennium. Machiavelli first warns leaders to beware of excessive generosity. Although many would believe that a generous leader would be loved and respected by his subjects, Machiavelli argues that it is also generates …show more content…
In addition to the importance of a leader to have a good reputation, it is also important for him to appeal to what citizens want to hear. As a result, for example, many politicians will avoid presenting their opinions on controversial issues that might lose some of their supporters. In addition, its not uncommon for a president to promise changes that are not carried out during his presidency. As we can see, deception is still highly used today by politicians. Many citizens would rather hear good things than bad things, even if they aren’t true. However, the risk a leader takes by excessively using deception is the possibility of losing his credibility, and consequently, losing the support of his people. Therefore, it is also very important to balance the use of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Is Machiavelli’s The Prince an amoral book, an immoral book, or neither? Fully discuss, illustrating your answer with ideas from the book. Machiavelli has gained a reputation of a cold-hearted, ruthless and cynical man mainly based on his famous book: “The prince”. The book itself is generally considered either immoral or amoral.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli’s intentions are clear from the very beginning, the dedication of the book to Lorenzo de’ Medici, the ruler of Florence. The Prince is not particularly hypothetical or abstract, its prose is transparent and its logic incomplex. These attributes underline Machiavelli’s desire to provide coherent, efficient understandable advice. In his book, “The Prince,” Machiavelli stated that a good ruler should not only mirror previous great rulers and seek advice when needed “the prince must read histories and in them study the deeds of great men; he must examine the reasons for their victories and for their defeats in order to avoid the latter” (The prince, XIV), but he should also devote himself to the military operations and preserve power distinctly, and not to mention defeat or eradicate possible threats such as political conflicts and potential enemies.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli is smart and a strategic author. There are many ways on how to interpret his famous work, “The Prince”. It is intriguing that Machiavelli did not provide a title for the book. In doing so, Machiavelli shows his strategic writing to challenge the reader. To read the book and accept it in a literal sense is questionable.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This distrust, however, is vital to Machiavelli’s end goal. He demonstrates the effectiveness of this method by providing the historical example of Scipio of Spain, “... whose armies rebelled against him in Spain, which arose from nothing but his excessive kindness, which allowed more license to the soldiers than was consonant with military discipline” (70). By drawing from this historical example, he proves that it is ultimately much more beneficial for the entire nation for a leader to have some distrust in their citizens. Throughout The Prince, Machiavelli creates many different rules for a leader to follow, but…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “It is necessary, if you want to master her, to beat and strike her” (Machiavelli, The Prince). In this quote, Machiavelli is referring to fortuna, or luck, as a lady and the individual as the potential master. In order to achieve this status of mastery, becoming a virtuoso, one must deal roughly with luck. In essence, this means that one must be bold and strong in one’s decisions in order to succeed over fortuna. This ability is referred to as one’s virtù.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many see this as wrong, without a leader with the same views of Machiavelli, we could possible end up destroying ourselves because we think we know what is best. Tarltron explains this theoretical stance, “The view that The Prince was simply an exercise in practical political wisdom rooted in an historical theory of imitable examples can no longer be treated as indisputable.” (Tarlton) Between the two, it would seem that neither would work in today’s socially accepted rulers…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Machiavelli's The Prince, Machiavelli instructs people wanting to gain political power should be more concerned with what is politically effective rather than what is morally right. Machiavelli encourages readers to do whatever is necessary to gain and keep power. While Machiavelli's methods seem harsh and extreme and I personally don't believe that they are ethically right, I believe they would allow a ruler to accomplish his goals of obtaining power. During the Renaissance when Machiavelli lived, there was an explosion of humanism and free thinking that focused on the individual person.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When is the rule by cruelty necessary, according to Machiavelli? According to Machiavelli, he claims that the prince needs to rule by cruelty, especially in terms of crime and justice. If the prince is generous at all times, including the period of disorder, people will lose trust. With courage and cruelty, the prince should abandon his personal qualities, rule by cruelty, and eliminate all possible crimes and misdeeds for the safety of the country.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Machiavelli and Socrates both lived during times of uncertainty, political fragmentation and violence, their philosophies about how the state should conduct itself are in direct contrast with one another. Machiavelli’s the Prince is founded on the principal that if a ruler wishes to maintain power, he should embody the ideology of pragmatism, while Socrates believes the state should follow him in his commitment to moral purity and justice. The inherent dissonance between these philosophies would lead Socrates to be unsupportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a prince, and consequently the political system Machiavelli would recommend he install, despite his apparent change in rhetoric from the Apology to the Crito. Throughout Plato’s interpretation…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas that Machiavelli displays are the true ideals of the era, however, the irony and satire surrounding how they are presented are not genuine: ““Any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good. Hence a prince who wants to keep his authority must learn how not to be good, and use that knowledge, or refrain from using it, as necessity requires” (Machiavelli). Machiavelli is revealing to the reader that in order for a prince to do a good job, he must lie to his subjects in order to be successful. He continues to be ironic and poke fun at the system in play and proves that these thoughts of the prince are not genuine. The beliefs that correspond with those of the era that are presented in The Prince are a strong ruling body in order to maintain social order:“Machiavelli, in the world we have described, often holds qualities like liberality, affability, generosity, courage, sincerity, gravity, and faith, to be of no more or less political value than their opposites, except in communication”(Moore).…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I. Introduction: topic and each political theorist Throughout history many political thinkers have quoted the words of Niccolo Machiavelli. Founding father, John Adams and philosopher John Locke claimed to be students of Machiavelli (Viroli Intro). Machiavelli is considered a founder of political philosophy, but his work is not without opponents. Leo Strauss, a political philosopher, argued that Machiavelli was a “teacher of evil” in his book Thoughts on Machiavelli, written in 1958, in which he discusses his interpretation of Machiavelli’s work.…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Growing up in such a tumultuous era allowed Niccolò Machiavelli to examine many cases of the rise and subsequent fall of short-lived governments as well as their causes, such as constantly changing alliances. These experiences led to a cynical view of human nature along with a clear understanding of the objectionable behavior necessary to retain power in politics. His career as a politician and diplomat cemented his very pragmatic stance on human nature and the nature of politics, both of which are described throughout The Prince. Unlike fellow philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, who preferred to hypothesize based on ideals, Machiavelli held the contentious belief that a separation between politics and moral philosophy was the necessary…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many political philosopher’s eyes, there is a special relationship between the ideas of moral goodness and legitimate authority. Some of these political philosophers believed that the use of political power was only morally correct if it was exercised under a ruler who had virtuous morals. These rulers who had virtuous morals were then told that in order to be successful, they needed to make decisions in accordance with the standards of ethical goodness. This moralistic view of authority is what Machiavelli criticizes in his work “The Prince.” In Machiavelli’s book, “The Prince,” the readers are introduced to political values that do not necessarily give full recognition to morality or religion.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He should not show his true self to his people. He must assume a mask or perhaps a persona that hides his true self and his real intentions, the motives behind his actions, and his true goals. Showing his true colors will work against popular support and ruin his efforts to achieve his goals, which are often not the same as those of the people. This reinforces Machiavelli’s view of human nature, showing his beliefs that people are manipulative and self-centered.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays