Literary Analysis Of Law Like Love By W. H. Auden

Improved Essays
W.H Auden’s modernist techniques combined with his unique style of writing makes his poetry difficult to read and interpret. However, his eccentric use of words calls for the reader’s imagination to create images that help grasp the central idea of the poem. Such can be seen in “Law like Love” starting with the ironic nature of the title. Law, as we know it is something which has clear cut definitions and rules which many do not favour. Love on the other hand, is not meant to have boundaries and to be regulated by rules or be dominated. To compare law with something as eternal and joy provoking as love is completely absurd.
Law is one of the oldest concepts in the world. Everybody seems to have an idea as to what law is, but Auden ventures
…show more content…
The youth can also be said to possess the Law in their pure “senses”, before the society corrupts them.

The Judge is seen to be an authoritarian figure, the following lines from the poem supports it; “Law, says the judge as he looks down his nose, speaking clearly and most severely”. Auden points out a contrast, how the law is seen to be completely normal and ordinary to those who are well-versed in it whereas the law is seen differently through the eyes of ordinary people. The judge interprets his society’s laws and applies precedents: “Law is as I’ve told you before, Law is The Law”.

There are always people who want to impose their own ideas upon others such as the priest and the judge. Religion and the justice system have equal claims to the law, they both seek to govern people’s lives according to a strict code of behavior that rests squarely on punishment. Both the priest and the judge are depicted unfavorably, with the priest possessing “a priestly look” while towering on his podium, and the judge “speaking clearly and most
…show more content…
The scholar also points out that the law offers both protection and restriction for all. “Law is the clothes men wear” “Anytime, anywhere” Through these lines, Auden brings out the truth that law is everyday routine life and that aims to protect us from external harm.

The “loud angry crowd” defines law as whatever they want, just as the “soft idiot” who claims the law to be “me”. Auden presents that we don’t know much about the law but acknowledges its existence and states that we should not be confused with what we want it to be. Auden portrays that those who want to alter the world according to their own ideology will attempt to impose their principles and laws upon the world.

The repetition of “Law” and “Law is” in the poem emphasizes the multiple ways that people interpret the Law for their own ends. The irregular length of stanzas emphasizes the same. Auden describes that what guides people’s idea of law is their own selfishness or their love and that the idea of law is not fixed in place or time. He concludes that law is like love because we do not know where it comes from or why it has come, we cannot compel others nor free from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Law is our border for our desire, the law controls what we get to experience in film, because law is the filmmakers that creates our ultimate fantasy. Mulvey states, “Sexual instincts…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The slogan of the day seems to be, ‘You’re a fool if you obey the rules.’” Frank Trippett claims. Frank Trippett in his passage, “A Red Light for Scofflaws”, explains that “law-abiding citizens” can even break minor laws and not even acknowledge it. The author supports this by first using examples about ‘minor’ laws that anyone can break daily. The author explains how americans can easily be frightened or worried about crimes but when driving can speed or when walking throw trash on the ground or cross the street whenever they please.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When you first start reading Kitty Calavita ‘s Introduction to law and society you begin to wonder what the book will truly be about. She starts off telling you about the history of the study of law and society. She then begins to tell of how society defines law and how a definition is hard to establish. As you continue through the book you discover that Calavita is trying to make three main points. These points I would argue are law is created by society and guided by society, Law allows society to hold back individuals and even create tensions between laws and the society, and lastly that law that those in society who interact most with the law tend to shape the outcome of the laws and the system itself.…

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This brings a more modern take on the classical poem showing how the more contemporary free verse can still carry the same meaning now as in the past. This…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The interviewees often thought of themselves as coming “before the law,” and in an oppositional relationship in which they were in a bureaucratic, definitional remove, with no ability to affect the law, nor did they have the aptitude to define its meaning purpose, or ends. This is the most original to traditional notion of the law as well as being objective, and as an external apparatus operating on society and individuals. The Rule of law is seen as a buffer between the individual and their society. This is law and society- life definition in the formal sense, and not a legal consciousness or…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Watchmen Style

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. What is meant by the phrase “the rule of law,” as used in a democratic society? The rule of law and democracy go hand in hand. The rule of law states that law should govern a nation and that the nation should not be governed by individual government officials. A key feature of democracy is the constitutional limits on power.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Joining The JROTC Program

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Joining the JROTC program has shown me that life has more to offer than what it seems. With the help of the JROTC mission of “To Motivate Young People to Become Better Citizens," I am one step closer every day to being the person I have worked so hard to be. This mission has helped me learn the values of law, truthfulness and trustworthiness, and has deepened my moral courage. Reading and reviewing the text, I have come to realize the true meaning of the law. It is there to help and protect people who cannot do that for themselves.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For centuries many individuals have questioned the true mean of social justice as depicted by the law. For instincts social ordered structure and misrepresentations of citizens are issues that should be attended to by individuals in power. Although at times this might be impossible because those in power are manipulated by corruption, causing many of us to feel the lack of social status. William Shakespeare’s “Measure for Measure” is a perfect example of power and corruption. Also would an individual has a right to declare themselves merciful in any given situation?…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States is a land of arguments, by nature. Thankfully serious legal arguments can be settled through the judicial system if necessary, as the United States is also a land governed by law. However, interesting situations arise when the law itself is the subject of the argument. Even more interesting situations arise when the Constitution, the supreme law, is the cause for debate.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stunz's Argument Analysis

    • 1289 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another site of legal violence is within mass incarceration. William Stunz addresses the violence of the system as focusing on the process over the outcome. He focuses on how the law was put into place to create the desired outcomes, rather than looking at the results to create the law. This focus on the process means there is no inquiry to whether material outcomes of the process are actually just and as such it appears that the system does not want to fix the problem, but rather just emphasize an existing problem. This is a systemic violence because the way the way the law is interpreted causes the focus on procedure rather than the outcomes (Gopnik 2012).…

    • 1289 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sophocles's play “Antigone” has resonated throughout history for its inspiration of civil disobedience. As the heroine, Antigone, claims that the king’s laws, Creon’s, are not the same as god’s law, it sets up a contrast between the laws of god and the laws of man. Through the work of tragedies, a culture of people form and integrate themselves within the political education: learning about tragedies and how to prevent them from occurring. Imagine if the President of the United States’s brother raised an army, fought a gruesome war with the United States, and is declared a traitor, as what similarly happened with Polynices. If this play was set in a democracy where the people vote by majority rule to ban the burial of this traitor Polynices, would Antigone’s actions, still conflicting with the laws of the state, be just or would the majority decision be just?…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Dr. King went to many cities, he often violated segregation laws. Between 1958 and 1967, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was arrested 30 times for demonstrating and participating in non-violent protests against segregation. The law he broke by being in the place restricted to blacks was Jim Crow law which segregation principle was extended to parks, cemeteries, theatres, and restaurants in an effort to prevent any contact between blacks and whites as equals. In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” King responded to Clergymen’s criticism about his activities which they thought were “untimely and unwise”. King explained African Americans were treated unfairly and cruelly, and it was difficult to wait any longer.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was drafted in 1787 and ratified by the states in 1789. In the Case of Marybury v. Madison, the Supreme Court ruled that it had powers to interpret the Constitution. According to legal resources, constitutional law deals with the fundamental principles by which the regime exercises its ascendancy. In some instances, these principles grant concrete powers to the regime, such as the puissance to tax and spend for the welfare of the population. Other times, constitutional principles act to place limits on what the regime can do, such as enjoining the apprehending of an individual without sufficient cause.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As a consequence, we have a duty to obey the law but it can be overridden when we have a more pressing moral obligation . Furthermore, to reinforce my point of view I will rely on what Finnis advocated concerning that matter. He was also conscious that saying an unjust law is not a law is a contradiction, when he talked about the peripheral sense of law. Indeed, he explained that law has two senses. On the one hand, law has a focal meaning, “it describes rules which secure the common good by co-ordinating the different goods of individuals” .…

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of ‘law’ has proven itself a tricky one to articulate. Despite its relevance within society, it is hard to condense the idea of law down to its core tenets. In their quest for a concise definition, legal theorists have approached law from different angles, and have tended to divide themselves into two groups – those who believe that any summation of law must include reference to morality, and those who believe that the idea of law either can or must be completely distinguished from any moral considerations. This essay will consider the views of hard and soft legal positivists Joseph Raz and H.L.A. Hart, and natural law theorist Thomas Aquinas, in order to argue that, while all of these theories capture something of the relationship…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays