Knowledge Is Power

Improved Essays
Knowledge is Power “Knowledge comes by eyes always open and working hands; and there is no knowledge that is not power”-Ralph Waldo Emerson. Throughout history men have fought and died for power. Great men such as Charlemagne of France and Augustus Caesar the first emperor of Rome shed blood and sweat to reach their goals of gaining and holding power. What is it however, that made these men of great statues come to power? What gave them the ability to become great leaders among their people? Knowledge, without it a man is nothing. Common knowledge is what makes a man great, but knowledge in the form of power far surpasses common knowledge. Knowledge is a source of power though military advancements and tactics, through government, and through …show more content…
These felt-covered tent dwelling people left their mark on history through their fierce speed and outstanding military skill. They used horses as their main means of transportation moving their army up to 70 miles a day on their conquest to conquer Afro-Eurasia. The Mongols used two key ideas to conquer their enemies. The mounted archer had pinpoint accuracy up to great distances while his horse was in full gallop underneath him. Along with these deadly archers, Mongols used an advanced method of warfare called the “feigned retreat” in which their soldiers would sound a sudden retreat call right in the middle of battle and fall back to a designated location only to rapidly reform their lines and slaughter the charging enemy. This style of warfare was brutal against enemies without the knowledge of the Mongols feigned retreat and it was not until the feigned retreat was used against the Mongols that they suffered a defeat. The use of tactics in warfare are still necessary in today’s battlefield and having the knowledge of good tactics can mean victory or defeat in a …show more content…
An example of well-planned government is the Roman Republic. Turning away from common kings, who were common in that day and age, the Roman constitution laid the frame work for one of the most impressive and well-rounded government of its time. A legislative body of men were assembled to make important legislation and vote on said legislation. Next, there was the Senate who’s purpose was to handle affairs of the country. This group of men were expected to be well polished and very knowledgeable about the laws that were in place. The final piece of the Roman government set up by their constitution was magistracies, who were elected by the people on one year terms. These magistrates were given the task of handling water supply to his people, roads in and out of his given area, and if necessary to lead an army into battle. Along with these sound ideas, the Roman government was designed for expansion. It was designed to adapt to the times as cultures and societies changed and evolved. The founders of the Roman republic used their knowledge of government to set up arguably the most powerful empire the world has ever seen. They knew that they could not see the future so they designed a system that could adapt with the changing times. The Romans are a great example of knowledge being power in that they knew how to establish a republic but also they knew that the future might bring

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were people from Central Asia who came together to establish an empire which lasted from 1206 CE to 1368 CE. They were herdsmen and tradesmen who herded sheep and goats, and were nomadic people. Even though at first the Mongol community was small, they were able to expand by conquering China, Persia, and Russia. The Mongols were culturally destructive and constructive to a moderate extent in Persia during the 13th century because they positively influenced academics while they subjugated agriculture.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although the ways the Mongols dealt with war and prisoners were barbaric, their society and way of life was extremely civilized. For example, the Mongols buried prisoners alive, which was extremely barbaric. Document four states “They severed the heads of the slain from their bodies and heaped them up in piles, keeping those of the men separate from those of the women and children.” This act was also extremely barbaric.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    DBQ On Modern Day Mongols

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Modern Day Mongols ~ The Mongols could be your worst nightmare destroying your village and killing all your family and friends or your best friend keeping you safe and making sure you had everything you needed but thats depending on whose side you were on. The Mongols were somewhat barbaric warriors that lived in the 13th century and took over most of Asia, The Middle East and Eastern Europe using barbaric Tactics. Even though the Mongols had barbaric tendencies they also protected their own. The Mongols were barbaric because they were an army that killed without remorse. They served the heads of the slain from their bodies and heaped them up in piles {Document 4}.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Mongols Essay

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In many reported deaths, caused by mongols, the statistics have arrived at the 2,000,000 mark. On the Carpini on Battle Tactics, it shows the way the mongols organized their fighting. The barbaric mongols would put false men on horses to make the enemy feel threatened due to the grand amount of the figures they saw, distinguished to be seen as real men. The soldiers who were from other nationalities were placed in front to meet the enemy first. Stronger men were dispatch at the right and left sides to surround the enemy and weaken the fortress.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After they conquered most of the known world and built their own empire, Mongols were known to be two things when it comes to history: great conquerors and barbarians. In terms of the former, no literature can contest that they deserved to be called and regarded as such. Inversely, the case of the latter remains an open debate to historians and even the rest of the world. This paper aims to arrive to a verdict whether the term barbarian is fitting to the Mongols or not. During the time when they were tearing down cities after cities and kingdoms after kingdoms, the Mongols were stereotyped and feared as ruthless vanquishers with barbaric nature.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols developed strategic methods to defeat their enemies in battle (Doc 3). When they were going to join battle they drew all the battle lines. Mongols were good at faking retreat…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the Post Classical era (600 C.E - 1450 C.E), there were several powerful conquests and religious influences across Eurasia. Historical terms such as Pax Mongolica and Dar al-Islam refer to two of the most influential groups in the Post Classical Era, the Mongols and the Islams. Reasonable minds will differ, but I think the most important and influential development during the Post Classical Era was Pax Mongolica. This condensed essay will provide persuasive evidence from many sources to support my claim. Pax Mongolica, also known as “The Mongolian Peace,” is a historical term used to describe the golden age for politics, trade, conquest, etc, for the Mongols.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Gorgias, Socrates argues against Polus an ancient Greek orator, that tyrants and orators do not, in fact do what they want, instead they do what they see fit. As a result of this claim, Socrates believes tyrants and orators have the least power in their cities. This paper will primarily argue Socrates’s views through the definition of power, who holds the “real” power, that some things are inherently bad, and that there are different views of morality. The argument that Socrates sets forth states “If a person does whatever he sees most fit to do when he lacks intelligence, is this still ‘having power?’”…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq Essay

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Mongols created the largest empire in all of history. The land they had conquered is more than two times that of the next greatest conqueror, Alexander the Great. But unlike Alexander, who is often remembered as a hero, the legacy of the Mongols is one of brutality and barbarism. But in truth, these so-called “barbarians” were, in fact, not very barbaric at all. Recent discoveries challenged the long-accepted statement of Mongols being savage brutes, suggesting that they were perhaps wrongly labelled; the facts about them were twisted and lost to history.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of his tactics were to terrorize his opponents by using brutality. He conquered areas all the way from Poland to China. The warriors in the Mongolian military were basically superior in skill at fighting than the skill that the rest of the militaries that they fought had. These militaries were similar because they both played a great deal in the rise of their empires.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ap World History Dbq

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Mongolian Empire between 1200-1400 C.E was growing and expanding rapidly across Eurasia. Their actions at the time were viewed as brutal and barbaric. As of late, this view is being debated, we see in documents 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 that they were extremely organized, were part of peaceful religions, and aided in the development and success of social structures, economy, and even new technologies and innovations in civilizations. However, in documents 2, 3, 4, and 5 we see evidence of their extreme brutality and barbaric tendencies, such as catapulting the burning body fat of dead men/women at their enemies and executing their warriors if they did not fight bravely/fearlessly.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: How Barbaric were the "Barbarians"? Although Mongols were strikingly ruthless through their military tactics (Doc. 2, 3,4,5), they were able to develop a rather sophisticated society (Doc. 7, 9, 10) and executed noteworthy and structured accomplishments (Doc. 1, 6, 8). As shown in documents 2, 3, 4, and 5, the Mongolians are quite infamous for their questionable harshness considering their military techniques.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were horse riding people that began gaining power in 1130 A.D and their empire collapsed in late 1368 A.D. They were known for their warfare methods, which were extremely unique at the time because they rode on horseback and completely destroyed every surrounding civilization they went into war with. The Mongols were also known for having one of the most iniquitous rulers of all time, Genghis Khan. Genghis Khan then passed the empire on to his grandson, Kublai Khan. Throughout this paper I will be discussing how the Mongol Empire was founded, how their education system worked, daily life, housing, how horses became such a big part of the Mongol Empire, Genghis Khan being in power, warfare for the Mongols, passing the empire on to Kublai Khan, and contributing factors of the empire ending in 1368.…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were known for their conquests for expansion. Eight hundred years ago the Mongols, were known for conquering much of Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe. They were originally from the grasslands of central Asia. They operated by horseback and using the siege weapons. They were nomadic peoples who competed with one another for pasture land and livestock.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was in control of many regions and not all of these inhabitants were delighted with the current circumstances, especially the citizens in Rome. During the period of the expansion of Rome, the government was becoming less democratic and started displaying signs of an oligarchy. The Senate of the Roman Republic was the prime branch of government. This was comprised of leaders from the patricians, the noble, and wealthy families of ancient Rome. Members of the senate were not elected but were chosen by the Consuls.2 The senate’s main task was to direct spending and verdicts associating with foreign powers.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics