Is Morality Right Or Wrong Essay

Improved Essays
As we think of morality, many questions, such as “what is considered right ?”, and “what is considered wrong?”, come to mind. While many people believe that religion can help us answer these questions, others argue that morality is self- determining and should not relate to religion in any way. When morality and religion are put together, it causes conflicts because one person 's’ morals are not the same as another individuals. One person’s morals can be based off of one religion while others’ morals come from a separate religion, or in some cases, no religion at all. Thus, causing conflict because of all the different opinions on what is considered right and what is considered wrong. Morality should not, in any way, be derived from religion.
Morality is defined as conceptions of right and wrong (Timpe 1). Morals are based on judgements and/or behaviors of a human being. Ones character can show whether or not this person lacks moral virtues.
Piero Pinzauti, a philosopher who argued that your morals should not be based on religion, stated that, “God cannot make any moral demand on humans, and thus He cannot reward them with salvation
…show more content…
A person could be the most religious, but still lack moral values. As for non religious people, they could have no belief in God whatsoever, but have the most respected moral values. Because of this, religion should not be intertwined with morals.
All in all, morality and religion should be looked at as two different ideas, and should not be related in any way. The most basic views of the differences between morality and religion is natural law and divine law. The connection between these two does not cause peace, but more so creates tension and further disagreements. However, good morals that do not have contact with religion in any way should be followed to make the world a better place to live

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mavrodes’ disagrees with Bertrand Russell’s secular views on religion, as he emphasizes his lack of religion and disagreance with the idea of God. Russell claims that morality does not need religion in order to work because they don’t go hand in hand. George Mavrodes rejects Russsell’s ideas and says his views cannot “answer the question ‘Why should I be moral?’ because the common goods are often just those that we sacrifice in carrying out our moral obligations” (Mavrodes, 194). Mavrodes’ doesn’t think secular ethics is a good comparison to whether or not religion and morality go together. He makes a point that secularists have no right to comment on the relationship because their input is biased and “deep” in their eyes is “matter and energy, or perhaps natural law, chance or chaos” (Mavrodes, 194).…

    • 1113 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separateness Of Persons

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The notion of “separateness of persons” has posed several convincing objections to utilitarianism. These have been voiced by Rawls, Nozick and Nagel all of which have disregarded the moral force that drives utilitarianism, highlighting the theories lack of recognition of individuality and separate utility. To me, the “separateness of persons” not only is successful in silencing utilitarianism, it also is crucial to our very concept of morality. I argue this through presenting defeats to classical objections to the dogma, proposed by Brink and Mckerlie. In doing so, it highlights that morality is reliant on individuality and personal values.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If God is not real, then He could not have created or interpreted morals. A response that might be given to this is that agnostics and atheists simply need to be converted, not only to “save” their souls, but also to make them morally upstanding people. However, based upon personal experience, one does not need to believe in any god to act morally, and therefore does not need to be converted to a religion that has yet to be classified as myth (along with so many…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli is not creating another moral universe, but rather he is pointing out the flaws of depending solely on religious morality. However this opposing idea of a stark contrast between morality as a system of ultimate values and politics as a realm of technical skill is a fallacy due to the ability to master the perception of good morality, as well as many other mastery’s, is a technical skill in the realm of politics. Machiavelli is concerned with the principles of right and wrong, however he discusses the importance of morality without religion. In society, moral values are often directly correlated with religion, but usually only the good moral values. When Machiavelli removes religion,…

    • 1571 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion, which creates harmony through peaceful coexistence, can be beneficial when individuals in society hold the same beliefs, but can be defective if people differ (Alzate 222). The freedom of religion, which consists of the choice to not practice a religion, creates this divide in society as the beliefs of those practicing a religion greatly contrast with those who do not practice a religion. If a community steers clear from religious principles, it can produce a political downfall of society as it creates a divide among the people (Alzate 227). This divide creates conflict between people’s beliefs and ideas as there is no framework by which people should follow. Conflict, as a result, prevents people from creating a religious society.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Will Of God Case Study

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Counter arguements As the divine command theory is logically exhaustive, a supporter must choose one of the above options to follow. However as both of them lead to be false, Divine command theory cannot be supported, and therefore god cannot be the only guide to which actions are right or wrong. Divine command theory what makes an action right is that god commands it to be done what makes an action wrong is that god commands it not to be done morals cannot change as it is the word of god, society doesn 't matter reasons for actions do not matter, only that the action is…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural and Subjective Relativism is that are no independent truths, all truths are relevant. They might be subjective; however, it’s relative. Relativism tries to show us that moral beliefs are true for us, but might not necessarily be true to another party. Cultural and Subjective Relativism is a form of moral relativism, it conveys that moral truth should be judges by the moral code of the relevance to society and culture. Cultural and Subjective Relativist like to think that society has different moral codes and the moral codes should not be compared because there is no moral measure…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant says that the religious law is not useful for ethics. He thinks that religion teaches you bad ethics. Religion tends to focus on things that are not ethically important. In other words, you do right in order to please God and do not do bad in order to avoid upsetting God. This is just self-interest and this is unethical.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Divine Command Theory

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Another issue with Divine Command Theory is that it is impossible to determine whether or not god actually exists, and if he does exist, does he command humanity at all. (Shafer-Landau) Another flaw in Devine command theory is explained by Shafer-Landau thru his description of The Euthyphro Argument. He summarizes the argument by saying that god may or may not have reasons for his moral code. If god has reasons for his moral code, than those reasons are what make actions moral or immoral, which disproves Divine Command Theory. If god has no reasons for his moral code then his moral code is random, causing his moral code to lack credibility.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality, Religion and Conscience 1. How does Arthur respond to those who argue that religion is necessary for moral motivation? According to the essay Arthur definitely oppose the idea that religion is necessary for moral motivation . He believes that people do the right thing because they are afraid of the consequences. He proposes various examples where people think about getting caught or what someone else is going to think of them.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics