Indeterminate Sentencing Analysis

Decent Essays
Judges are limited in their sentencing discretion by statutory provisions, philosophical rationales, organization considerations, presentence investigation reports, and their own characteristics. There are many statutory provisions are indeterminate sentencing, determinate sentencing, flat-time sentencing, mandatory sentencing, presumptive sentencing and then the restitution that has been paid for the injuries that the defendant has caused. The philosophical rationales that limit are a judge are the criminal sanction penalties that have been set for violating criminal law. There are three organization considerations that limit the amount of discretion a judge has is he plea bargains that have been set, the capacity of the system, and the amount

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The court applies the rule of lenity insisting that it gives both the people and the Congress fair notice. In doing so, the citizens know what constitutes criminal laws and to the Congress as to what its laws criminalizes. In effect the court insists on strict view of the penal laws by narrowing the scope and reach of the…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first article is written by Cyndy Caravelis, Ted Chiricos, and William Bales (2011) called “Static and Dynamic Indicators of Minority Treat in Sentencing Outcomes: A Multi-Level Analysis” and the second article is called “Sentencing with Discretion:Crack Cocaine Sentencing after Booker” by Ryan S. King and Marc Mauer in 2006. In addition, the last article is by Mona Lynch and Marisa Omori (2014) called “Legal Change and Sentencing Norms in the Wake of Booker: The Impact of Time and Place on Drug Trafficking Cases in Federal Court” from the Law and Society Review. Summary Caravelis, Chiricos, and Bales (2011) examines the “Habitual Offender” using a hierarchical generalized linear modeling to look at the direct effects of race using static…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Commerce law assessment task 3- Lachlan O’Malley Mandatory Sentencing in New South Wales 1. Mandatory Sentencing- a mandatory sentence is a court decision where legal discretion is limited by law. Most frequently, people convicted of certain crimes such as armed robbery or murder must be punished with at least a minimum number of years set in prison. 2.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the most recent couple of years the verbal confrontation about whether obligatory sentencing ought to be nullified, and judges utilizing their own carefulness ought to happen has turned into a well known dialog in the United States. I see upsides and downsides for both sides. Mandatory least have filled the correctional facilites and penitentiaries with an excess of peaceful, first time guilty parties which brings about prison/jail packing and more obligation. President Obama expressed in a discourse "We have to lower long obligatory least sentences or dispose of them totally. " Opponents of compulsory least sentences contend that: Minority litigants are excessively detained contrasted with Caucasian respondents under the compulsory least…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A jury may also exercise the sentencing guidelines are usually imposed by the judge in most cases, but sentencing or it can be mandated by a statue; such as, mandatory prison sentence for certain crimes. There are various forms of sentences that are to be reviewed: concurrent and consecutive sentences, good time, sentencing sanctions, sentencing models, indeterminate sentences, determine sentences, structured sentences, feral sentencing guidelines, mandatory minimum sentences, and that of the three-strikes laws. The issue with concurrent and consecutive sentences is that concurrent sentences allow for than one sentence to be served at the same time as the others, while consecutive sentences only allow for one sentence to be served at a time, this is good in the case that there…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Congress has granted the Sentencing Commission to conduct research and collect data collection. There instructions were to “develop means of measuring the degree to which the sentencing, penal, and correctional practices are effective in meeting the purposes of sentencing” (Barkow, 2013). Guidelines are limited because the only govern judges and parole officials but lack the appropriate regulations to govern prosecutorial discretion. Congress have been known to ignore findings provided by the Commission. Their recommendations fell on death’s ears when it came to the Commission proposing to eliminated the disparity between sentences for usage powdered and crack cocaine in in the mid 90’s.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to federal and state courts their sentencing methods are different in away because federal courts deal with all federal crimes and the sentencing as well as the trial takes place in a federal court close to where the actual crime happen. Now in a federal court the judge uses a manual known as “The Federal Sentencing Guidelines” (avvo.com. n.d.). This helps them to calculate the penalties for a serious offense sentence. Unfortunately, this sentencing guideline cannot be used mandatorily; it is still used in helping make penalty considerations. Now in a state court penalties and sentencing are often guided by the state legislation.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judge has the power to accept or deny the plea deal, and part of this process is to deny sentences that stray too far from the Sentencing Guidelines. Kosman writes that it is even encouraged for the prosecutor, defendant, and judge to agree to a plea sentence “explicitly calculated according to guidelines” (Kosman 806). Federal district courts that have denied these motions for sentence modifications, and federal circuit appellate courts that have upheld such rulings based on assumptions of the plea sentence and the per se rule have clearly demonstrated the overall trouble plea bargains have caused defendants. While plea bargains have clearly not been the best deal for defendants who are often first-time offenders, such a high rate of cases ending in plea bargains demonstrates the ubiquity and power of the practice in the American criminal system. This facet, combined with the disparity in crack cocaine sentencing has produced even more unjust outcomes for defendants who were offered sentence reductions by the Sentencing Commission, and reflects the harsh reality of plea bargains in the American criminal…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Police Discretion Essay

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the provision of fair punishments, judges must use their own discretion during sentencing to take all aspects of the case into account. However, judicial discretion became restricted after community outrage pertaining to inconsistent sentences. R v Jurisic established the basis of sentencing guidelines due to the leniency of his sentence by the court. In particular, three charges of dangerous driving under the influence of cocaine that led to grievous body harm resulted in an 18 months home detention, a 2 year good behaviour bond and a 1 year suspension of his license. Therefore, under the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), this established mandatory maximum sentences for serious crimes.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It takes the power away from judges, muzzling their ability to evaluate both the motives and the needs of a particular defendant. This practice leads to inequity and sentencing which is disproportionate to the crime committed. Aristotle says, “In cases that the issue happens to fall outside the universal formula, it is correct to rectify the shortcoming.” We need to do something about our inequity problem. We need to abolish minimum sentencing laws and instead follow Aristotle’s maxim that judges are to be the most virtuous among us.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Disparity In Sentencing

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aside from issues where the law is clear in what an officer “shall” do, the constraints may become more apparent in regards to the community’s perception of certain crimes, community demographics, and the officers themselves. I have experienced this with refugee communities, and it clearly affected how I exercised discretion. In some cases, it became a teaching moment on both the community and me as to what is acceptable behavior and what is not. Taking the time to realize that even though refugees receive some “training” before they arrive in the U.S., not everything is addressed, and assimilation takes time.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How is Aboriginal Incarceration rates being addressed and how viable are these legal solutions? Circle sentencing is an alternative method of sentencing adult Indigenous offenders. It involves the local Indigenous people to get directly involved in the process of issuing sentences to the offenders, with aims of making the criminal justice system a little more meaningful and also confidence improving.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They need to be loyal to the rule of law because of procedural fairness. It is difficult to treat same kind of cases the same way and different cases differently because there are other factors that play into each crime, but the court should be consistent with prior decisions. Judges do not have full discretion because they have guidelines they need to rule by. Judges cannot go below or above sentencing guidelines. The way the use their discretion is by the mitigating and aggravating factors that prosecutors and defense attorneys present.…

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As already stated, judicial discretion encompasses the freedom that judges are assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction. The allowances provided by the law to practice discretion mean that personal opinions are usually injected in the making of judgements in the legal system. As such, discretion leads to unpredictability and discrepancies in the issuing of sentences for similar criminal offences. Discretion is a double-edged sword that carries advantage and disadvantages. The advantage of judicial discretion is that it allows for the consideration of the unique circumstance of each case and apply the legal provisions according to these guidelines.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays