Immanuel Kant's Ethics Analysis

Improved Essays
Immanuel Kant’s ethics is all about good will and following your duties. He believes that we need to have the right motives and if we do, then it is good. For example, we should be loyal to people, but if you are being loyal to an evil person, then that is not good. If you are being loyal to a good person, someone who has a goodwill then that is following your duty. Having a goodwill is unique in that the fact that is is always deemed moral and right, even if it fails to achieve its intentions. As long as you have good intentions in mind, that is what is important. In Kant’s ethics, the concept of goodwill is a more broad term for a will. A will is something that comes from your duty, and your duty is doing what you need to do to keep the moral law. Our acts that are done in correspondence with our duty are good and needed, but Kant says that the acts performed out of duty are the acts that have moral worth and are given a special esteem. Even though the acts done along with our duty are not thought of as highly, that does not make them less important. Since people are supposed to follow and fulfill their duties, we …show more content…
After all, it is not as though people would stop believing each other simply because it is known that people lie when doing so will save lives. For one thing, that situation rarely comes up—people could still be telling the truth almost all of the time. Even the taking of human life could be justified under certain circumstances. Take self-defense, for example. There appears to be nothing problematic with the rule “It is permissible to kill when doing so is the only available means of defense against an attacker”.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Someone who supports Kantianism would argue that they are right and say that a person is good because they always do what is right. However, that does not tell the whole story. By no means am I arguing that doing what is right or fulfilling your moral duty doesn’t make a person good, but what makes a person more good is having a good character. A genuinely good person does not do good things just solely because they are required to by law or should do it. They do good things because it is in their nature and they value these…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When based off of feelings as for a reward for doing the right thing then it is not morality. The main goal is to fulfill a duty, whether we think it’s right or wrong, whether we get pleasure from it or not, whether we benefit from it or not. In his view, morals are superior to emotions and desires. His theory consist of deontological ethics that are based on character (Kant, p 44). When a person makes a decision based on the moral law, then they are considered a “good” person in Kant’s eyes.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant And Individualism

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This leads us to become too aware and concerned with our own personal welfare, that we then develop a strong sense of individualism. For us to act morally, we then have to have a sense of duty to it. Duty is “a natural sound understanding and does not need so much to be taught as only to be brought to light.” In other words, we as humans have an understanding…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This account of moral knowledge differs from other accounts given because of the way it views morality and what it deems as morally right. Consequentialism said that morality of an action depend on its results. If good came out of the action, despite the fact that the fact may be questionable, then what the person has done is morally right. Kant’s duty based ethics view said that morality was based on intentions that were universalizability. Virtue ethics deems that morality is gained through experience, training, and…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believes that the action of duty has moral worth and if we were to avoid the doubt and have the lack of belief of our ethics, it must be rational based, unconditional. The good will in the act of duty is “good with-in itself”. Kant describes ethics as action as any sort…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The later is doing his action out of good will, whereas the first felt bad. Kant focuses on our duty to others because it is the right thing to…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The virtue ethics is occasionally consistent with the deontological approach. In order to achieve best virtue, a person is required to behave in accord with universal values or rules. For example, since honesty is regarded as a universal principle, being honest is the fundamental character of being a good person. Sometimes, the consequentialist ethics converges with the values which a best person wants to achieve. An altruistic and considerate person is supposed to concern about bringing others benefits that implies maximizing intrinsic good or overall…

    • 1077 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perseverance Definition

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before perseverance can be described as a virtue, the idea of a virtue must be defined. Virtues deal with what is good and what is bad. A virtuous person follows society’s standards for what is good. This person exhibits behavior according to what is morally correct. And since virtuous people do virtuous actions it can be deduced that a virtue is a pattern of behavior that reflects moral character.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics What has value? Doing the Right Thing Human beings commonly act out of self interest. Image is an important part of who we are. The right thing to do it categorical, not hypocritie What is "doing the right thing"? Is it the golden rule of treating others the way you would want to be treated?…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When defining morality it is important to “recognize the existence of significant variation in what rules and ideals different people put forward as morality.” However, in philosophy, the ethical system which makes the best case for what morality is really about it would be Deontology rather than Consequentialism. This is because deontologists are concerned with doing the right thing because it is what is ultimately morally good which is more ethical than defining what is right by whether or not an act results in a positive consequence. “Ethics, also called moral philosophy, [is] the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong.” The categorical imperative and other deontological teachings fit neatly into the definition of ethics since the top priority is to always do what is right before being concerned with anything else. Deontology defines what morality is really about because taking the most ethical approach is what a deontologist values most, the same cannot be said for a consequentialist, which makes deontology superior to consequentialism from a moral and ethical…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics