I Will Not Vex Your Souls By Johnny Bolbroke Sparknotes

Improved Essays
An execution is an odd thing, the definitively dividing line between life and death. This line is also reflected in rebellion. Both are delicate things, not easily walked by the common man. Although the condemned may not have much time left, in that window they are still human. Their tongues, though burning with limited wick, can speak truths no other can. These times are rare, and cannot be taken lightly. BB's part in these executions is a difficult one to play, but he does it masterfully.

Bolingbroke starts his short speech with a disclaimer, a very tactical move. To rid himself of any further blame or guilt, he splits his disclaimer into two parts: what he isn't going to do, and what he is. In saying "I will not vex your souls" (line 2),
…show more content…
if actions speak louder than words, why not just do something? Everyone there (except the prisoners) is completely fine with the execution taking place, why bother wasting breath saying something already known? More than anything, this is a formality. In repeating the crimes out loud, for all to hear, BB clears all possibility of understanding. Without a declaration of cause, some ill-doing audience member could claim that the trial was unfair, and BB executed two innocent men. This also fivers BB a place to say whatever things he wants to the prisoners. No one would fault him for passionately reading the crimes against his king. The severity of the crimes lend a stage for BB to truly speak his mind. In the next 20 lines, Henry not only reads the crimes, but does so with a fire that lets him bleed his true emotions. Within the bounds of his rebellion court, there are certain things that are considered acceptable. Barring his emotions to the world would not be considered acceptable. Burying those same emotions in a diplomatic speech, though, is fair game. Henry realizes that, and he also realizes that a rebellion is a dangerous and fragile thing. One wrong move and he could be executed by his followers. However much he wants to get mad at the men that have done him wrong, he cannot risk it. This speech is not only a display of BB's real emotions, it is one of his incredible temperament, control, and diplomacy, showcasing his ability to be an effective

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Henry express that they are not weak. This strategy is an appeal to pathos, forcing the audience to face an emotional question that will give the readers different responses. By using pathos he persuades the audience to free Virginia from the British colonial…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the short story The Twenty-Seventh Man, Nathan Englander illustrates how people’s fear about death and the future will gradually turn into acceptance, entwining the lives of those on death row. Through the four writers Pinchas, Zunser, Bretzky, and Korinsky, the author describes their madness as they are trapped in jail, awaiting their execution, and unable to bond with each other. However, by the end of the story, the four men are more accepting of their death and each other, acknowledging their commonalities and becoming no longer afraid. These four criminals of Russia already are displayed with unresolved weaknesses; Zunser “trying to adapt to change”, Bretzky “hadn’t really awakened”, Korinsky that “worr[ied] about… his wife”, and Pinchas, without his own worries, worries about “the others’ breathing, making sure they were alive” (Englander 10). These worries from each person contributes to their personality and acting towards each other, while Pinchas will become the one to help bring them together, along with Zunser’s adaptability.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thousands of prisoners were moaning and groaning throughout the night. “In the middle of the night I was awakened by being kicked by a dying man.” quoted a prisoner…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He spoke with affinity, avidity, passion, and showed an undeniable support to fight against the English government. He uses allusions, rhetorical questions, and metaphors to effectively persuade opponents and supporters of the Revolution to unite and fight the British for American independence. By using allusions to well-known works such as the bible and The Odyssey, Henry develops credibility as a well-informed and educated speaker. Alluding to the Bible, Henry tries to justify his assertion that the British have betrayed them long ago and warns the audience not “. . .…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his speech at the Virginia Convention, Patrick Henry gains followers for going to war with Great Britain by predicting what his opponents will argue for and attacking it before they even state it and the use of pathos. Patrick Henry states that they should not be fooled by the “insidious smile” that their petition got. This shows that he is trying rile the people up by bringing up how bad the situation with Great Britain is. Henry makes them seem untrustable and back stabbing and that they should not hold back in going to war with them. Henry then attacks things the other candidates will argue for.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry commonly refers to God as he is delivering his speech. He states, “Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through the fear of giving offence…and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven which revere above all earthly Kings,” (Lines 11-14). In this excerpt, Henry discredits the king of England by stating that God is compelling and above him. This causes the effect on reassuring the colonists that God is on their side and it is a mission of God to fight Britain. Both of the rhetoric devices of pathos and ethos that he applies creates a stir of emotions to the colonists since God is no one to be…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holder’s speech was not only sufficient in persuading his immediate audience to be over-achieving, goal oriented, and progressive leaders; but his uplifting and heartening motive echoed from the printed text and had a lasting effect on his secondary…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patrick Henry Rhetoric

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On March 23, 1775, Patrick Henry gave a speech at the Virginia convention to convince the House of Burgesses and the colonists to prepare for war, as it was the only option available. He started the speech without discrediting the original viewpoint of the audience; instead, Patrick Henry compliments the British which gains the colonists trust and respect. Henry then apologies in advance if he offends anyone with his new viewpoint which further creates a connection with the audience. Furthermore, he aligned his new perspective with the Bible to create a religious passion towards the subject that shows that he is fighting this battle for God. By using various tactics such as asking rhetorical questions, triggering an emotional response, and…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marjane Trinh's Passage

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In Trinh’s passage, she criticized the inhuman and evil of the Iran regime by introducing the situation of how the prisoner was tortured by the judge. “The prisoner is made to sit, lay down and tie both hands upwall. A lot of scars on his back are from the cruel torture by being beaten with the rod or burned with an iron.” Even we could only feel the scene throw virtual media, it is still appalling me with the gloomy atmosphere and cruel behaviors. When the time we feel regret for the prisoner, it comes a penal which shows the end of his life.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They gradually become accustomed to murder as another, outcome of exposure to such cruelty by the SS. Displaying that he was inured to the hangings Juliek, one of prisoners, quietly speaks to Wiesel, “Do you think this ceremony’ll (sic) be over soon? I’m hungry” (59). He speaks of the hangings as if they are not as tragic as they actually are; as if his appetite is more significant than these people losing their lives. Consequently, the strict environment the prisoners are forced to be in caused them to give up their individually that made them human.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Prisoners could no longer withstand the pain and fatigue, and were dying on the spot. Elie, however, felt a sense of resistance. To him, “something within me revolted against this death” (85). Elie exhibits a change in his mentality. Before, he thought from the point of…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He is constantly sympathetic with his remarks throughout the entire speech to show that he means no harm but is speaking his…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were the hangings of a young boy and several men during his containment. The boy was caught a culprit in trying to sabotage the camp. After not giving up information he was hanged to intimidate the other inmates. He did not weigh enough to have an instantaneous death but instead “he remained for more than half an hour, lingering between life and death” (65). The death of this boy caused change…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At the end of the poem the speaker says “Now I am dry bones and my face a stony skull staring in yellow surprise at the sun” symbolizing the irony of enlightenment that comes at the end of this merciless killing. There is a shift from innocence to knowledge in this line; the victim learns that social injustice and man’s inhumanity to man imposed on him is…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I also feel, since this was broadcasted live, that his facial expressions were playing a key role in his speech. Also, as his speech was broadcasted through live television, I feel his facial expression played a role in the speech. It was important what facial expressions he made. He was able to keep good eye contact with the camera, making it appear that he was talking to every American citizen who was watching it live. His facial expressions showed one of sadness and shock which played a vital role because if someone was smiling, they would not be able to empathize with the audience in this situation.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays