Though the novel itself is a satire, satirical elements are more prevalent in specific parts throughout the novel, and are especially thought provoking in Offred’s encounter with the Japanese tourists and in the Historical Notes section. Atwood uses satire to exaggerate the fascism that ultimately created Gilead. Therefore, when the Japanese tourists asked whether or not Offred was happy, she replied “Yes” as she was fearful that the Eyes were watching her. Atwood believes that her insignificant and untrue response is really the only measure that moral and cultural relativists can use to judge whether or not people living in another society are content. Moreover, in the Historical Notes, Atwood exaggerates the productivity, or rather unproductivity, of conferences and is critical of historians caring more about the facts and statistics than the story itself. For instance, Professor Pieixoto reminds the audience that they should know better than to judge Gilead by their own standards and culture. This is met with a tremendous applause from the audience. Throughout the whole novel, Atwood validates the reader’s judgement by depicting the grotesque acts that Offred and the rest of the Handmaids have to endure and perform. Therefore, Atwood is pushing for a universal ethics system which does not necessarily need to be specific to feminism, but rather basic human rights. This can be paralleled with the way that many Iranian women and men were treated during the Iranian Revolution in the 1980s. It is through the use of satire that Atwood is able to create a fictitious dystopia and therefore allow the reader to judge the actions of Gilead within his or her own paradigm. Ultimately, Atwood’s impact makes the reader question other society’s treatment of women around
Though the novel itself is a satire, satirical elements are more prevalent in specific parts throughout the novel, and are especially thought provoking in Offred’s encounter with the Japanese tourists and in the Historical Notes section. Atwood uses satire to exaggerate the fascism that ultimately created Gilead. Therefore, when the Japanese tourists asked whether or not Offred was happy, she replied “Yes” as she was fearful that the Eyes were watching her. Atwood believes that her insignificant and untrue response is really the only measure that moral and cultural relativists can use to judge whether or not people living in another society are content. Moreover, in the Historical Notes, Atwood exaggerates the productivity, or rather unproductivity, of conferences and is critical of historians caring more about the facts and statistics than the story itself. For instance, Professor Pieixoto reminds the audience that they should know better than to judge Gilead by their own standards and culture. This is met with a tremendous applause from the audience. Throughout the whole novel, Atwood validates the reader’s judgement by depicting the grotesque acts that Offred and the rest of the Handmaids have to endure and perform. Therefore, Atwood is pushing for a universal ethics system which does not necessarily need to be specific to feminism, but rather basic human rights. This can be paralleled with the way that many Iranian women and men were treated during the Iranian Revolution in the 1980s. It is through the use of satire that Atwood is able to create a fictitious dystopia and therefore allow the reader to judge the actions of Gilead within his or her own paradigm. Ultimately, Atwood’s impact makes the reader question other society’s treatment of women around