How Do Judges Influence Politics

Improved Essays
“If we are serious about maintaining the rule of law and an independent judiciary, we cannot ignore the fact that judicial campaigns and elections, supported by an ever-increasing river of money from and ever-more concentrated group of contributors, conflict fundamentally with the promise that a judge’s only constituency is the law” (O’Connor & McGregor, 2012, p. 1744).

I think most American would agree that our judges in all levels of government are influenced by politics. Just recently, the 9th Circuit Court voted President Trump’s executive order on a travel ban unconstitutional. This was a very controversial decision and due to all the attention the media brought to this, it later was reveled that the 9th Circuit has been overturned approximately 80% of the time. This would suggest that this court is heavily influenced by politics and makes decisions based clearly on the left side of the aisle. There are recent cases all over the country where judges have let a violent felon go free and that convicted felon commits murder a short time later. Then, outrage is expressed over the judge’s decision, but
…show more content…
Over twenty states are using this system and if done correctly, this system can ensure the lack of prejudice by judges (O’Connor & McGregor, 2012). To be successful, the commission must be neutral from the branches of government (O’Connor & McGregor, 2012). It must also be politically, demographically, and ideologically impartial and offer an open door to the public so that trust is present (O’Connor & McGregor, 2012). Merit systems allow people to directly have input in selecting and retention of judges (O’Connor & McGregor, 2012). This system means judges will retain their position based on their performance and not on a politically and finically motivated election (O’Connor & McGregor,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, in this trial, the implications of an elected versus appointed judge can be seen. Judge Horton did the right thing by overturning the conviction of Haywood Patterson, he did so at great risk. Horton, an elected judge, basically ended his career with this move. It is this situation that leads me to believe that judges should be appointed rather than elected. Not every judge, especially when put in a situation like this, would have the integrity to ignore the political ramifications of their decision.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    C Parliamentary Sovereignty v Bikie Laws The doctrine of separation of powers works alongside that of parliamentary sovereignty, in that the parliament decisions reign of all others. In practice, the parliament can enforce and create laws that override court decisions, which the court has to enforce. The laws being enforced in the case of R v Brown, enacted by the Queensland Parliament include mandatory requirements for the courts, such as mandatory refusal of bail. These target those who are alleged bikie members, bikie members or members by association. This limits the unfettered independent decisions of the courts, as they now must follow the obligatory sentences set by the laws of Parliament.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criticisms regarding elections only reinforce Justice O’Connor’s claim that judicial elections represent an opportunity for partisans and special interests to install judges who will answer to them. In Citizens United v Federal Election Commission , by allowing such groups to spend without limits on communication tools during campaigns, the Supreme Court upheld these concerns. According to the majority, spending represents an exercise of free speech, a right guaranteed by the First Amendment , and still valid “even if the orator is a corporation” . In reality however, through this ruling the Court gave its consent for lobbies’ interests to prevail over the public interest .…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merit Selection In Texas

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When our founding fathers created the American Constitution, it was very clear that they wanted the judicial system to be free from political influence. There are many opinions on how to achieve this goal: appointment by the governor, election by the voters and the merit selection. The merit select is a method of choosing judges using a nonpartisan commission of locate, investigate, evaluate and recruit applicants for the judicial system. Once the applicants have been selected the governor then makes the final decision. The selected judge serves a specific amount of time (typically one term) and then placed on a ballot, not as candidate but instead to ask voters if the judges should remain in office.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Texas judicial system right now is defined by elected judges that make decisions based on what will get them elected again, and personal ideological views. If the state had judges that were appointed, they would be less worried about reelections and raising money, so the state government to run more smoothly and verdicts would be less biased. Both sides of the argument have benefits and downsides, but the benefits of having appointed judges out rules those of the elected one. The decision to have elected or appointed judges is important because it affects the way that the laws of a given state, namely Texas, are interpreted and carried out. For example, if a judge accepts a large sum of money from a company or person to fund their election campaigns, it is close to impossible that that particular judge will not have a…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court is commonly thought to be “above politics,” since they are there to just interpret the law and not argue politic, inevitably though, politics still manages to seep in. In fact the appointment of justices is, in reality, extremely political due to all the factors needed to be appointed. In order to be a justice three main characteristics are needed: ideology, ethnicity, and political experience. Each one has a profound impact in the appointment process. Interests groups are extremely concerned with the whole process because it could help or hurt the interests groups and it constitutions for generations if a justice is appointed that has contradictory views.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professor Gerald Rosenberg, in his analysis on whether courts are powerful agents in achieving social change, highlights two main court views: The Dynamic Court view and the Constrained Court view. The Dynamic Court view holds that courts are successful agents in producing social change, while the constrained court view argues for the opposite (Rosenberg, 2). The American civil rights movement was an important demonstration in Rosenberg’s argument of the Constrained Court view (Rosenberg, 9). The Constrained court view maintains that courts cannot produce social change. In my response, I will deconstruct his court views to understand whether courts can produce significant social reform.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pewresearch.com took a survey on Republicans, Democrats, and Independents on whether the U.S. Supreme Court should base rulings as they are meant today or as they were originally written. Most Republicans said that the U.S. Supreme Court should base rulings as they were originally written (69% to 29%). On the other hand, Democrats (70% to 26%) and Independents (48% to 47%) said that the court rulings today should be based on what the U.S. Constitution means in current times. In total 49% of the people that were surveyed, said that the Supreme Court should base rulings on today’s meaning of it. 46% of people surveyed said that they should rule court cases by how the U.S. Constitution was originally written.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To maintain the strength of the Judicial Branch having a strong system to provide checks and balances of the other branches of government, there should be a certain level of independence for the Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch often has the last say in matters regarding judicial review, and because of this, they should be able to operate independently from the other two branches and serve as the final say in these matters. According to Padovano, Sgarra, & Fiorino, (2003), the judiciary is generally better positioned to check such unlawful behavior then voters, since he has access to much better information than they do. Voters that often want a bigger say in these rulings are not always the best options for keeping a strong checks and balances for the highest level of decision making that occurs in the judicial review process. A certain level of independence to the Judicial Branch can allow the certainty of a strong separation of powers and checks and balance system that cannot be controlled by the very parts of government it is trying…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you go out and about within our country and you ask people if they knew very much about the United States court system, they will most likely tell you that they do not know very much about the court system unless they have been involved with the court system whether it be federal or state level. Most people do not realize that the court systems have three levels within them or that there is certain situation that will allow you to get to one level or the other. There is a whole lot of information that some people may not know. They may not know about judicial review and how it came about. Some people may not even know how justices decide the ruling of their cases.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays