Secondly, “Even if they could, enforcing a single ‘true religion’ would never work, because you can’t be compelled into belief through violence.” (Locke). And thirdly, “coercing religious uniformity leads to far more social disorder than allowing diversity.” (Locke). Locke argued that the ultimate aim of the state was to just preserve the quiet and comfortable living of men in society, but that it’d have nothing to do with the good of men’s souls. Religion was a personal choice, and churches were voluntary organizations, which could set their own rules and be left to it. It was thanks to Locke’s influence, that the idea of locking up people for their beliefs fell entirely out of favor. This was a truly remarkable achievement for one book, by one man to have set in train, but Locke didn’t stop
Secondly, “Even if they could, enforcing a single ‘true religion’ would never work, because you can’t be compelled into belief through violence.” (Locke). And thirdly, “coercing religious uniformity leads to far more social disorder than allowing diversity.” (Locke). Locke argued that the ultimate aim of the state was to just preserve the quiet and comfortable living of men in society, but that it’d have nothing to do with the good of men’s souls. Religion was a personal choice, and churches were voluntary organizations, which could set their own rules and be left to it. It was thanks to Locke’s influence, that the idea of locking up people for their beliefs fell entirely out of favor. This was a truly remarkable achievement for one book, by one man to have set in train, but Locke didn’t stop