Case Study: Hartsock Vs. V. Rich

Great Essays
Title and Citation
HARTSOCK et al. v. RICH’SEMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION et al.
Facts of the Case
This case is about a check was accidently sent to the wrong address, and the check was illegal cashed by someone that it was not intended for. According to the case, it is about Carolyn Hartsock whom received settlement payments from Prudential Reinsurance Company. After receiving her settlement, she sold one of her lump sum payments of $60, 096 to Singer Asser Finance Company, LLC. She wanted Prudential to send the payment to Singer Asset Finance Company, LLC post office box in New Jersey. Prudential issues the check, but Singer Assert Finance Company, LLC never received it.
According to the case, after the check was issued, the check was changed to
…show more content…
“The court case Hartsock et al. v. Rich’s employees credit union et al. takes about the “Uniform Commercial Code, expressly provides that an action for conversion of an instrument may not be brought by a payee or indorse who did not receive delivery of the instrument either directly or through delivery to an agent or a co-payee.” It explains why a payee to whom a check was never delivered has no action for conversion” (www.law.justia.com).

Decisions
The decision was that “Rich’s” was not at fault for the check being cashed by someone else and not by Singer. According to the case, there was no evidence to prove that Rich’s and Wachovia acted in concert with each other or with any other person or entity to accomplish an unlawful end or a lawful end by unlawful means. “The underlying tort of conversion is absent, and thus there can be no liability for conspiracy” (www.law.justia.com).

Reasoning
1. Review of case shows that it was no evidence to show that there was any conspiracy to the check being mailed to the wrong address.
2. The person that the check was for never received it.
3. The check was cashed illegal
4. It was evidence that it was white out on the check to show words were changed on the check.
5. There were misspelled words on the check to show that the wording was changed on the check.
6. The whereabouts of the person that cashed the check is

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Stewart lied when she told the Securities and Exchange Commission, the FBI and federal prosecutors she had prearranged with Bacanovic to sell ImClone when it fell well below $60 per share. The second count against Martha Stewart is that of conspiracy. This was filed against Stewart and Bacanovic. The charge alleges that Stewart and Bacanovic willfully and knowingly worked together to obstruct justice and make false statements in the stock trading scandal (Leite, 2012). The third charge against Stewart is that of false statements.…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Charter Bank Case

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages

    General isn’t able to collect from the Angelini’s because the work was never completed and General isn’t considered a holder of the note. Therefore the Angelini’s would win the case.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The COA restored the ET’s decision that Nadine was not an employee as a result, tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear her claim of unfair dismissal. The judge held that mutuality of obligation was present partially which would not amount to contract of employment because employer was not bound to provide her work and to pay wages. Secondly, Nadine was paid by her customers and did not receive sick pay, holiday pay and other benefits. All these factors are consistent with the claimant being a self-employed. There was no umbrella contract, however the EAT was wrongful to find.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rule 10b-5 bars any person from making a misstatement or omission of material fact in relation to the purchase or sale of any security. The wrongful act was in association with the national securities exchange, which is one of the requirements of Rule 10b-5. A purchaser of a security is able to sue an auditor who has misstated or omitted a material fact without requiring privity. The defendant must have acted with scienter, intent to deceive, which isn’t the case in this situation therefore I wouldn’t be found liable under Rule 10b-5. (Mallor, 2010, p. 1202) IV.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, there was an anonymous phone call made in 1997 from a person who warned of the illegal practices BFA was engaging in. The only that Arthur Andersen did that might be construed as reacting appropriately was the writing of an internal memo that alluded to the phone call. But the suit alleges that the matter ended there. 5. For Arthur Andersen to regularly give a company like BFA copies of its audited financials, which are then distributed to investors, is a dubious practice.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If it was done, there should not have been bankruptcy and other events leading to the closure of the company. SAS99 insisted on the consideration of the fraud in a financial statement audit but does not require it to occur in the statement. It is required as per the part of the protocol; the internal auditors should show sufficient professional expertise in critical evaluation of the financial statements and with skepticism. SAS 99 emphasizes that the internal control mechanism and the auditors should take risk of fraud, and should adapt the audit based on the skeptism and the findings. The mechanism of noticing the fraud detection hotline is absent in the Kmart.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    c. Answer: Yes d. Rationale: 1. Common law fraud. HOLO issued false financial reports and hided the embezzlement on purpose, Tony willfully expressed the unqualified opinion on financial statements and internal controls. This was a fraud. 2.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful Removal We the Plaintiffs did, not file any amended pleadings or causes of actions claiming TILA. The Defendants did not file our motion with their removal. They claimed the motion…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ultratra Vires Case Study

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    6. ULTRA VIRES CONTRACTS A contract of company which is ultra vires, i.e., outside the objective clause as defined by memorandum of association is wholly void and is of no legal effect. The objection to an ultra vires contract is, not merely that the company ought not to have made it, but that it could not make it. The main issue is not as to the legality of the contract; but the issue is as to the competency and authority of the company to make it. An ultra vires contract which has the effect of void- ab- initio, cannot become intra vires by any reason of estoppels, lapse of time, ratification, acquiescence or delay.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Actus Rea

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    No facts in this case show Ryan had any involvement in this case. The state cannot charge Zynal and Ryan because the state can’t prove Actus rea and Mens rea. State v Jason and Arooj Issue: Can the state char Jason and Arooj with burglary? Rule: Actus Rea: An act that is voluntary or there is an…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays