Hand's Role In Questioning Ethical Behavior

Improved Essays
No. It was unethical for Hand to permanently delete Seed’s incriminating files. In choosing her course of action, Hand violated at least one of the tenets of the Principle of Respect for Persons: she did not show each and every person in her department the sympathetic consideration they deserved. By choosing to help Seed and delete all the incriminating files, she did not thoroughly consider the potential repercussions her actions could have on her co-workers, associated third parties, the Internal Affairs Department, and the Sheriff’s Department. Considering the ideal of honesty, Hand was not being truthful to others as she choose to deceive Internal Affairs of their suspensions by deleting the files. Further, Hand appears to have violated the ideal of prudence; she acted impulsively and with her emotions, thereby, not thoroughly thinking through the consequences. Hand also violated the ideal of fairness, as Hand did not act partiality and without bias. Hand appeared to also …show more content…
Ethical behavior, according to Utilitarians, is one in which provides the greatest advantage or pleasure to the greatest number of individuals. One should weigh and consider all parties affected by the action and calculate the pain and pleasure of everyone who is influenced; therefore, an individual should choose the action which produces the least amount of pain or maximizes the total amount of pleasure. Rule Utilitarian further accentuates this perspective by concentrating on the outcomes of the activity, looking at their potential long haul impact, and the point of reference, such a conduct would set. Therefore, Rule Utilitarian looks to expand the advantages to the most number of people over the longest period of time, so conduct that achieves that objective would therefore, be viewed as

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    It is a form of consequentialism (i.e. the morality of an action should be judged by its consequences) which states that “an act is right if and only if when compared with all options, it maximizes the existence of pleasure in the whole world” (Bentham). In simpler terms, utilitarianism advocates for the “greatest good for the greatest number.” For example, say you were trapped in a falling elevator with five individuals. You have two options: 1) Kill one of the occupants so the elevator can stop its rapid descent and the remaining five people can get to safety; or 2) refuse to harm anyone but have everyone (including yourself) die from the impact of the elevator striking the ground. What should you do?…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a branch of metaethics that focuses on the ideas of consequences, self interest, and unbiasedness. Instead of determining if an action is moral through the immediate effects, Utilitarianism skimps over the short term and instead focuses on the long term effects of actions. Actions are no longer based on intention but, rather the overall effects from those actions determines if the parent event was morally good or bad. Utilitarianism also emphasizes the idea that an individual’s well being trumps all moral responsibilities, if a person has to steal food to eat then by utilitarianist standards this person is being morally correct despite his obvious theft. This is advantage to the ideology as it allows for a greater sense of…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas and Challenges Developing an evaluation plan can help an agency manage the relationship it has with its stakeholders. However, an agency or community program may face numerous ethical dilemmas and challenges that may threaten the successfulness of the program. Such as stewardship, or demonstrating socially responsible management of resources to those who have supported the agency or community program (Waters, 2009). In our proposal, Extended Hands promote services that will benefit single parents that are seeking affordable and quality child care.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. How might utilitarianism be used to resolve dilemma 4 (pg. 132 of Jones)? Do you agree with this resolution? Why or why not?…

    • 1308 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rule-Utilitarianism is a rule that endorses that each action provides the most happiness for any given party. Rule-Utilitarianism determines the rightness or wrongness of an action by determining if the action to be performed will offer the most happiness with everything considered. Norcross’ target argument is arguing that torturing puppies by oneself is just as immoral as hiring someone else to do it for Fred. The argument concludes by saying that torturing puppies is indeed immoral by oneself but also immoral if one hires someone else to do it. Therefore, we see that Rule Utilitarianism is used to decipher which action is going to produce the most…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The type of utilitarianism that you choose is where you should be careful. It’s not always beneficial to do something because it helps the greatest number of people. That’s when the topic of morality comes into play which is the followed by rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism talks about the greatest good for the greatest number, however, it does not bring morality into perspective. So, if you have the option of saving six people and killing one, you would do so?…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Goldman Sacks Case Study

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As a result, no one persons happiness matters more than another’s, making utilitarianism impartial. In most cases, the patient or client is in the best position to judge what is in their best interest unless a doctor or anyone else is in a better position to decide what will promote the most happiness. Rule-utilitarianism focuses on the importance of rules for ethical behavior while maintaining the standard of the greatest good. The rules that promote the most general good must first be determined- the first question is not which action has the greatest effectiveness but which rule.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are twelve different versions of utilitarianism. Six versions of act utilitarianism and six versions of rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is if a person’s act is morally right, but it is only right if it results/ produces the best possible outcome for that situation. While rule utilitarianism is that an action is right as long as it conforms to a rule which is for the greatest good. Generic utilitarians do not have set answer for what is intrinsically good or bad.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the branch of normative ethics, a person discerns what is right or wrong behavior. There are several theories about what is right or wrong conduct, but two of the most popular ideas is Utilitarianism and Kantianism. Both set up strict methods of deciding how a person would know what the right thing to do in a situation would be. On one hand, utilitarianism claims that you can use intuition to discern what the greatest good for the greatest number of people is. On the other side, Kantianism claims that you can use reasoning and logic to discern moral obligations and rules.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of an action. Endowing to the classical utilitarian moral theory, we classify human acts or practices as we consider neither the nature of the acts or practices nor the motive for which people do what they do. This can harvest to one’s action; that a life conceivably is saved, which matters morally. There is no total distinction between what is right and what is wrong based on Bentham’s view, only if the consequences are the highest favorable for the person’s greatest happiness, even including the majority of the people related to this person who is responsible to give that action. Drawing a conclusion about utilitarianism, it is our duty to decide which action or practice is best by considering the likely or actual consequences of each substitute.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Act Utilitarianism Versus Rule Utilitarianism Act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism are two utilitarian moral theories which determine the moral status of actions based on consequences. I will begin by explaining what act utilitarianism is and its appeal. Then I will argue that although act utilitarianism is appealing, it is flawed because it conflicts with intuitive moral verdicts concerning individual rights, and that it is an impractical theory to implement. Afterwards, I will describe what rule utilitarianism is, how it compares and differs from act utilitarianism, and how it avoids the problems act utilitarianism faces. An opponent to rule utilitarianism can argue that it conflicts with intuitive moral verdicts, but I will illustrate…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Specifically, rule utilitarianism brings about the idea that one should act according to a set of rules that would lead to the most optimal consequences and is deemed by a majority to be acceptable. In contrary, Kant believed that one’s actions should be based on the purity of the will and not based on consequences at…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In recent events, James Liang, an employee of 30 years for Volkswagen, came forward admitting to using software to deceive emissions tests in the United States for Volkswagen’s diesel engines. The engines, on average, produce 40 times the legal limits on emissions. After undergoing investigation, it was found that Volkswagen had been involved in this scandal since 2006. In response to public outcry the company has recalled all models using this engine and set aside 16 billion dollars to fix their mistake. However, for Liang after admitting his guilt, he intends to help bring others responsible for the scandal to light.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    It looks at what is morally right and wrong and their consequences. Depending on the pros and cons of this discussion, a utilitarian would choose the option that gives the most pleasure or happiness or “maximizes utility” (Rachels). Topics that are evaluated by this can include moral codes, laws, policies, etc. One of the biggest benefits of utilitarianism is the idea that the approach makes a decision on a case-by-case basis. Classical utilitarianism can be summed up in three statements: 1.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays