Hamlet Problem In Hamlet

Improved Essays
Many scholars research Shakespeare’s plays to learn about him, his lifestyle, and the customs of that era. Hamlet, written by William Shakespeare in about 1599, is read and studied by nearly every student. Even though countless scholars have researched it, the play ultimately leaves them puzzled. Each person that has studied Hamlet has come up with a unique opinion and conclusion of the play. Although Graham Bradshaw and William Empson both have different views on the way Hamlet was written and the famous “Hamlet Problem”, William Empson has a more valid argument on the new play.
Graham Bradshaw, a professor at the University of St. Andrew in Scotland, considers that in order to understand some questions posed by Hamlet, we must first look
…show more content…
“Experts mostly agree that Kyd wrote a play on Hamlet about 1587,” but the only record of the play is in 1594, which makes it easy to believe that Shakespeare’s company bought the play (Empson). Shakespeare then rewrote the play only changing the dialogue, without adding or removing scenes. “We are to think, apparently, that Shakespeare wrote a play which was extremely successful at the time and continued to hold the stage, and yet that nearly two hundred years had to go by before anyone had even a glimmering of what it was about” (Empson). Shakespeare had not really written a tragedy before, but the play was written in response to the how the audience interpreted the old. Thus, the problem itself was the audience, who was considered the reason for the re-writing in the first place. In the new play, there were many allusions referencing the old, yet they are not clearly seen since many do not know about the old. In the first writing of Hamlet, Hamlet was sane in his soliloquys and only showed insanity when responding to others. In contrast, the new had the audience laughing with Hamlet early on so they could laugh at him at the end of the play. As to why Hamlet is insane, “there seem to be two main assumptions, that he is trying to frighten his enemies into exposing themselves, and that he is not so frightened himself as to hide his emotions though he hides their cause,” (Empson). Shakespeare essentially made the old play more realistic to the people, but never altered the story itself. Some argue that Shakespeare changed Hamlet to portray himself, but others argue that a man who would show himself as Hamlet has some serious conditions. However, if you take the story literally, Hamlet is thought to have legitimate reasons for his behavior. “It was probably [Shakespeare] who (by way of adding "body") gave Hamlet very much better reasons for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The prominent actions of Fortinbras, directs readers to focus on Hamlet’s hamartia because it ultimately is the cause of his downfall. The readers are able to use Fortinbras to compare with Hamlet and be able to dictate the important personality traits of Hamlet, which Shakespeare tries to highlight. In short, Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Fortinbras is used as a foil to illustrate Hamlet’s traits and not as a valuable character of his own right. Fortinbras mirrors Hamlet’s personality through, familial duty, actions, and vengeances. The plot would not have been noteworthy if Hamlet had not struggled with his tragic flaw: his lack of action, which Fortinbras highlights.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hamlet loves, has social interactions with others, has normal behavior, and is not mentally ill. So if someone claims that Hamlet is insane then they are also insane themselves. What someone believes to be right typically is the beliefs of the people that they are surrounded by but in Hamlet's case he believed what he wanted to believe which just so happened to not be the collective's belief. Using the definition of insane Hamlet is far from it proving beyond a reasonable doubt Hamlet is in fact not insane. Works Cited Shakespeare, William.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet's Madness In Hamlet

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Another reason why the ghost had to be real is that what he was telling Hamlet was proved to be true. Hamlet could not be imagining the ghost because Hamlet did not know the exact details of how Claudius killed the king. Hamlet used the play he directed to test what the ghost had told him and he found it to be true due to Claudius’ reaction. If for…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Or maybe he, as well as Marcellus, are just messing with Hamlet, but Hamlet is actually taking it seriously. Either way, if the people around Hamlet think he is insane, then it very well might be true that he…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In feigning madness, I feel Hamlet is conforming to the devious ways of people he despises (i.e. Claudius). By contradicting his own commitment to authenticity in his thoughts and actions, Hamlet becomes, to me, Shakespeare’s example of how we can all be subjects of hypocrisy. Furthermore, Hamlet’s paradoxical relationship with words also suggests his duplicity. I feel that Shakespeare foreshadows Hamlet’s hypocrisy through his opening line by saying: “a little more than kin, and less than kind”, where he manipulates words to provide double meanings.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One example of this is that most of Hamlet’s “soliloquies” actually have Horatio standing besides, nodding along. Although Horatio provides a character that Hamlet can talk to, it also provides a pair of watching eyes on Hamlet’s character, which he must then adapt to. For instance, in the soliloquy on death that he delivers with poor Yorick’s skull, Hamlet seems more reserved in emotion than during the famous “To be or not to be”, where a true flood of emotion is poured out. Forcing the audience to doubt their ears is a technique that Shakespeare may have used in order to emphasize the idea of…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This era was of comedy and romance so it was a great way to read a Shakespearean play that is so relevant today. Rumors are spread like wildfire and they are mostly consisted of lies that hurt other people. It is meant for comedy and one’s own pleasure but in some circumstances it can be used to bring people together such as it did for Beatrice and Benedict. But when regarding Hero and Claudio it was a disaster, the rumor was intended to hurt Hero and for Claudio to slander due to the mischievous Don John and his jealousy towards his brother and fellow friends. William Shakespeare took the time to write down this comedic play to not only enforce comedic relief but to also show the people of the time how much rumors can destroy or build.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    HAMLET’S MADNESS AS FEIGNED: Though many critics have delivered the verdict on Hamlet’s madness as genuine and real, but their judgments were counter answered by others who proved logically and rationally that Hamlet’s madness was feigned or assumed, but not real and genuine. The very first argument given by them is that, “A mentally deranged Hamlet could not have proved a tragic hero, because in our definition of the Shakespearean tragedy we have seen that the tragic consequences must proceed mainly from the protagonist’s conscious acts or from some flaws in his characters. A mad man cannot be said to have any character, for character is the offspring of mind’s consciousness (Umrani; ______; 39).” To analyze Hamlet’s madness as feigned one has to distinguish between the melancholia and madness, though both belong to the mental conditions of a person suffering from it. Difference between Melancholia and Madness: Melancholia…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet must live up to his father’s reputation. How would Old Hamlet handle a situation? With Fortinbras, he openly declared combat. Hamlet, however, strategizes and delays the revenge he feels he needs to take on Claudius. Hamlet’s madness seems genuine to the other characters.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hamlet Sanity In Hamlet

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is Hamlet Insane? The sanity of the human being is a treasured thing and, by its nature, a vital component of what makes a person. Yet in order to avenge his father’s death Hamlet willingly sacrifices his own sanity, at least in public, so that he may conspire without suspicion. In fact, Hamlet plays the part of an insane man so convincingly, many have claimed that at some point in the play the madness stops being an act and Hamlet truly loses his mind. However, Hamlet shows a clarity of actions and a level of analysis throughout the entirety of the play that is simply not present with an insane person.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics