Milton Friedman Government Intervention On The Economy Essay

Good Essays
The Effects of Goverment Intervention Within Economy
Source one is a direct quote from Milton Friedman illustrating his perspective and opinion on the market economy. Within the quote, Friedman is directly voicing his belief that the only logical way for an economy to be ran is through means of private ownership and investment. In his mind, interference from the government only disables the everyday consumer from living in what he thinks should be a free society. Within his quote he states, “Nobody spends somebody else’s money as carefully as he spends his own. Nobody uses somebody else’s resources as carefully as he uses his own.” With this statement, Friedman is implying that the government has no right to dictate how consumer’s money and
…show more content…
He stated, “The free market punishes irresponsibility. Government rewards it.” This clearly illustrates that he, like Friedman, is strongly in favour of capitalism, and the ideas that it brings to society. Typically a market economy has strict societal class divisions, and those who work hard for what they earn are normally put into the middle and upper class. Browne is in agreeance with this theory because he believes that those working for their profits should be rewarded for their actions. On the contrary, he thinks that those who fall into the lower class should not be rewarded by the government through means of welfare programs. In his opinion, the act of taking money from the government without earning it is simply irresponsible. He thinks that when the government intervenes with economy in such a manner that they are simply encouraging poor behaviour. Browne’s opinions are similar to those displayed in Adam Smith’s book “Wealth of Nations”. Smith had a strong opinion that individuals should be free to work solely for themselves, and those who neglect to do so shouldn’t be rewarded for their lack of self interest. This quote, much like the last, portrays Browne as a classic liberal. His ideology is consistent with that of a classic liberal in that he does not agree with the government hampering economic growth by acting as a charity case. …show more content…
Source one is a quote displaying Milton Friedman’s displeasure towards the government being able to hold jurisdiction over the money and resources consumers work to provide for themselves. It is a direct statement supporting the ideas of an economic system in which people are allowed to work wherever they want, gaining profit by performing to their fullest potential. Source two is a quote from Harry Browne that exhibits his dislike towards unmotivated people who are rewarded for their own selfishness. He is saying that those who do not work for what they earn are not rewarded in market economy, and thus, he frowns upon those who rely on the government for their money. Source three shares a similar opinion as source two in that it is displaying how those who do not work for their income should not be allowed to freeload off of those who do. Both are saying that the government should not encourage the poor behaviour of citizens who are willingly to take from the rich, ran then work towards getting themselves out of the proverbial rut of poverty. The third source, unlike the others simply displays an example of this principle by calling Barack Obama out based on his actions. It is displaying him giving candy (which in this instance symbolizes money) to children who did not get as much. This is meant to criticize

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Due to the two sides, the perceived lack of morality in wealth matters to the less wealthy individuals of society. Mahatma Gandhi states in (book name) his own opinion of the moral indifference in terms of wealth. He believes that when we make economic gains, we hinder our social progress. This social progress is described as our moral state. Despite Gandhi’s belief, I must disagree with him.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Friedman and Social Responsibility of Business Introduction Milton Friedman believed and argued that business people take care of the responsibilities that affect them in their day to day life. However, they don't care the impact their businesses have on the society so long as their market is growing and increasing their profits. The main reason why he argued this is because believing in a reduced impact that the government has and a free-market. He found that government solutions to problems are no better because its solutions are even worse than the problem itself. As a result of his belief, he believed that the government should keep off the businesses activities because of its greed and the quest of people to have access to power.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When Marx critiques Locke's liberalist theories he proves some contradictions that Locke was against. One contradiction was Locke wrote that men were equal and free in the state of nature and that they all had the same natural right to own property. Marx criticizes this principle because after the consent of money inequality emerged among citizens because the more money a man had the more property he can own, labor was no longer essential to own property. Another critique made by Marx was slavery, Locke wrote that a man cannot sell himself to slavery nor can he have someone overpowering him, again after money was invented it started a capitalist society and a class system of the wealthy bourgeoisie and the working-class proletariat. The working class was selling themselves to be slaves to the wealthy for minimum wage, the more hours the proletariats work the less valuable he was as a…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He does not want people to compete for land, power, money, or anything really. The importance of competition, of a challenge to be better is what drives humankind to do better. The kind of economy Marx describes is controlled by the wealthy, but that does not mean that entry to that class is closed. If people choose to compete, if they choose to innovate, if they choose to work towards a new and better idea, then they may too rise in rank. Marx believes that everything man makes either alienates or brings them closer to…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Foner Labour Movement

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The sources argues that a more left government will tax producers for the benefit of their possibly unemployed citizens. Benefiting citizens comes from “subsidizing” or funding in the form of government welfare programs. The source also heavily criticizes this system as they describe that members of this ideology believe that production occurs by “magic”. Capitalists would agree with this source’s perspective, specifically because it aligns with their beliefs in government economic involvement being detrimental to the overall economic health. To defend their beliefs, an individual could point to the downfall of the welfare state during the 1970s.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is the foremost justification for why capitalism is despised by many and not applied as it should be. The market has to function on its own for it to reflect all the perks of capitalism, as the name evidently indicate— free market. Trying to regulate price, to control and restrict companies, to tax unfairly are all signs of a corrupt capitalist government. Ironically, these actions may appear acceptable and reasonable but they are not. Nonetheless, a government’s task should be anything but these.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To leave the markets alone, the laissez-faire approach to economics was the catchphrase for Adam Smith and other Classical economists. This approach lent its power to the “invisible hand” of the market and the idea that adjusting the way the market works would ultimately affect its ability to function properly. Smith believed the market was a “perfectly ordered mechanism operating according to natural laws.” This was a misguided idea, when the market is left to make its own decisions without restraint, they are not likely to make everyone better off like Smith thought (Canterbery 39-45). The Industrial Revolution brought quick growth and dissolved Adam Smith 's vision for his perfectly ordered, harmonious economics. Smith himself, witnessed employers keeping their workers on subsistence wages to control them.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx mentions that the discovery of America is a big reason for the separation of classes (Marx 9). He does not like the idea of capitalism because people value profits instead of other people like the working class. The increased trade led to the strengthening of the bourgeoisie, or capitalists. Marx say that “The bourgeoisie has torn away from the family its sentimental veil, and has reduced family relation to a mere money relation” (Marx 11). Marx believes that the increase in trade has made the bourgeoisie class selfish.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Occupy Wall Street movement can be analyzed through the lens of Karl Marx and David Harvey. Harvey critiques the idea of self-regulating markets, or neoliberalism, because not everyone has an equal opportunity in the market and without any state intervention it becomes unfair to those stuck at the bottom. Marx writes about the class struggles between the proletariat and the bourgeois. The bourgeois have purchased the labor of the proletariat at a minimal price and therefore have alienated the proletariat from their own work, but they have also given the proletariat the knowledge of how to work the means of production, so Marx predicted a social revolution would happen where the proletariat will gain power. Well, that did not happen, but…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Martha Gellhorn thought that the New Deal did not go far enough to help out the poor and the policy makers should make new measures. Huey Long also thought that Roosevelt was in favor of the rich and could not help out the poor and realize his promises. Therefore, he organized the audience to build the Share Our Wealth Society to fulfill their dreams. However, the movement was aborted. Herbert Hoover criticized Roosevelt’s New Deal because it harmed the liberty of the nation and he proposed to endow the business with more freedom.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays