1984 By George Orwell Descriptive Language Essay

Improved Essays
“The empire on which the sun never sets,” also known as the British Empire was the largest empire the world has ever seen. Through the use of imperialism, specifically colonization the British were able to spread their dominion over one fifth of the worlds population. Advanced military technology ensured that the British could enforce their will, culture, and economic policies on people deemed unfit to govern themselves. George Orwell shows the dark side of imperialism through the use of descriptive language and pathos; to convince the reader of the negative effects of imperialism on both the oppressed and the oppressor.
Orwell continuously shows how imperialism changed his morals; and that of the native Burmese people. Where there was suppose to be love in his heart, was now just an abyss of hatred towards the imperialistic British Empire he serves; and the Burmese people who he grew to hate for their malicious behaviour towards him. The use of descriptive language and word choice is crucial in Orwell’s effective portrayal of the lack of morality that imperialism brings with it. Buddhist Priests are known throughout the world as kind and thoughtful people;
…show more content…
The term is only used when we empathize towards someone or something. The narrator considers the life of the elephant to be worth the same as human, hence the usage of the word murder. Orwell’s usage of the word murder instead of kills; makes the reader have a more interpersonal relationship with the elephant. The reader now feels a mixture of emotions from sorrow to wrath at the death of the elephant. Now looking to point fingers and assign blame, the reader comes to the conclusion the imperialism is at fault. It was imperialism that led the Burmese people to pressure the narrator to kill the elephant; Imperialism caused hate to fester in both the conquered and conquered, making them do things they knew to be morally

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    In “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, the author explores his feelings and blameworthiness towards a tamed yet potentially dangerous frenzied elephant whom he shot in Moulmein, Burma. In this situation, Orwell deplores his actions and elicits his depth of regret towards murdering the elephant, of which he later justifies as, in short, preserving the legacy of British power and authority in front of the Burmese natives (through irony and narration). Although confession does not justify most actions, confession may ease the guilt. Taking responsibility for his own actions, Orwell may be able to lift the guilt from his conscious; nonetheless, just spouting a few words about taking responsibility does not justify Orwell’s pretentious action.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His outer ego-the one that represents the British Raj-is satisfied because he succeeded in proving his superiority;however, his inner ego is crushed since he went against his ideology. This infuriates him and it is implied that he can only side with the Burmese in terms of being against imperialism, since he is bothered by everything the natives encompass which is why he describes their glee in a negative…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He then realizes the true meaning of imperialism, who he must be; "He wears a mask and his face grows to fit it”(PAGE NUMBER) Orwell also realizes that “when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys”(PAGE NU,BER). This quote proves that the moment Orwell accepted the gun, he committed to killing the elephant. Orwell concludes that even though colonialism looks logical the true incentive to be savages is their insecurity. Meanwhile, in “Miss Youghal’s Sais” Strickland’s main conflict is his denied access to his love due to his terrible repuatation. Since he has a reputation of being strange from disguising himself as the Indians, Miss Youghal’s parents banned him from seeing their daughter.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The trolley driver decides to kill one instead of five and many believe his decision was morally permissible based on the fact that killing more is worse. In the Transplant case, the doctor has the choice between killing one and letting five die. He chooses to kill the one, the same as the trolley driver, but in his case the killing is seen as morally impermissible. Even though the net worth of lives saved would be much greater if he killed the one, based on our proposal, killing is worse than letting die, his decision would still be declared wrong by many people. The proposal that killing is worse than letting die explains why people react differently to the decisions that the trolley driver and doctor make even though they are very similar because they both choose to intervene and save five people.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    George Orwell faces multiple conflicts in Shooting an Elephant. The first is British imperialism. The British took over Burma and they are treating the natives terribly. Second, the natives aren’t taking this imperial government kindly either as they continuously mock Orwell because he’s a symbol of the government and a vulnerable “obvious target” (Orwell). Orwell hates the way the British impose their power on the Burmese.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author’s conflict is shown when he says,“With one part of my mind I thought of the British Raj as an unbreakable tyranny, as something clamped down [...] upon the will of prostrate peoples; with another part I thought that the greatest joy in the world would be to drive a bayonet into a Buddhist priest's guts”(1). He is conflicted on sympathising with the native or to seek revenge for the way he was treated due to his authority. The rhetorical device is used by creating a contrast by using attributing joy to killing a buddhist priest while attributing tyranny to the British Raj. His decision to shoot the elephant is also shown throughout the essay, fluctuating due to the expectations. Initially the author doesn’t want to shoot him as “the elephant looked no more dangerous than a cow”(2).…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gandhi Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lacking inward strength, we have been reduced by all the universal disarmament to a state bordering on cowardly helplessness.” (Lines 17-24 in the Letter to Viceroy, Lord Irwin)By explaining these events, this appeals logically and emotionally to the reader, recognizing the situation and generating feelings of distraught from the tone. Gandhi said in his letter "Though I hold the British rule to be a curse"(Line 10-11 in the Letter to Viceroy, Lord Irwin),"And why do I regard the British rule as a curse?" (Line 16 in the Letter to Viceroy, Lord Irwin)There is no control on a curse it is generally placed upon someone or something. This word choice is used as a negative connotation, but does not put specific blame on to a person, thus he is able to persuade the audience to advocate for his point of view on freedom. Counter to this…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Confucianism

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In document 4, Han Yu, an official at the Tang imperial court, called Buddhist followers a collection of barbarian people. He called Buddhists this because they had different views and cultures. In this document, he calls the remains of Buddha “unlucky remains” and asks how it could be allowed in the palace. He later even asks for it to be burnt to take the evil out of it. These statements and requests show the deep hatred for the religion and its followers.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theme Of Oppression By George Orwell

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    All I knew was that I was struck between my hatred of the empire I served and my rage against the evil-spirited little beast [the Burmese] who tried to make my job impossible?. Though Orwell?s handling of his subject is detailed, in the end, he subtly condemns imperialism. Orwell finds himself in a moral predicament no different than the ones placed on the white men in the East. Orwell justifies his actions, ?solely to avoid looking a fool,? driven by the instigation of the Burmese (165).…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contributors Stade. et al. state in the Encyclopedia of British Writers that “[h]is Burmese experience taught him the evils of institutionalized force, and his writing reflects his mission to oppose all forms of oppression.” Orwell found the actions of his fellow Englishmen grotesque in the way they treated the natives and how the power perverted the actions of those in higher positions. On a secret level he supported the people of Burma and understood their hatred for the British. Orwell died in 1950 sharing his distaste for despotic governments through his works of writing.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics