Manifesto of the Communist Party strongly states that Europe already recognizes Communism and it is a political influences, it should not be dismissed. The communistic members meet in London to help facilitate the movement, to inform people and to disprove the misguided accusations of their ideas. Throughout history there was always a class struggle between the bourgeois and the proletariat. In different periods of history this relationship was labeled in different ways. As the authors state that free-trade is the feudal society reconstructed with new class names. However, the oppression placed upon older and modern society remains the same, in fact it is even more so because the division between both bourgeois and proletariat is greater. This
…show more content…
He believed that a free trade economy actually made slaves out of all people who were not in the ownership of the manufacturing facilities. He also argued that because free trade was not regulated it would mean they can manipulate the economy to their advantage and discard the working class into poverty.
In regards to slavery, Fitzhugh believed whites were undeniably superior to slaves. The master was more advanced in knowledge, biological attributes, morality and overall more civilized. Fitzhugh argued the master served a better leader and owner to his slaves than the massive industrial company. As a slave, they also did not have to compete for resources amongst each other. The free-trade system would put everyone on the same work level and slaves were assumed not to be advanced enough to succeed due to their many inferiorities. Slave owners on the other hand would be better suited to be supervise these slaves because masters provided both work, housing and knowledge in exchange for labor. He advocated that slavery was anti-free trade and there was no need to buy and sell when slaves had things handed down to them. The slave is also gaurnted to be taken care of because it is in the master’s interest not to lose any slaves. In this exchange, Fitzhugh argues slaves and masters are a better economic arrangement than the free trade
He believed that a free trade economy actually made slaves out of all people who were not in the ownership of the manufacturing facilities. He also argued that because free trade was not regulated it would mean they can manipulate the economy to their advantage and discard the working class into poverty.
In regards to slavery, Fitzhugh believed whites were undeniably superior to slaves. The master was more advanced in knowledge, biological attributes, morality and overall more civilized. Fitzhugh argued the master served a better leader and owner to his slaves than the massive industrial company. As a slave, they also did not have to compete for resources amongst each other. The free-trade system would put everyone on the same work level and slaves were assumed not to be advanced enough to succeed due to their many inferiorities. Slave owners on the other hand would be better suited to be supervise these slaves because masters provided both work, housing and knowledge in exchange for labor. He advocated that slavery was anti-free trade and there was no need to buy and sell when slaves had things handed down to them. The slave is also gaurnted to be taken care of because it is in the master’s interest not to lose any slaves. In this exchange, Fitzhugh argues slaves and masters are a better economic arrangement than the free trade