• Home Page
  • Analysis Of Famine Affluence And Morality By Peter Singer

Analysis Of Famine Affluence And Morality By Peter Singer

Improved Essays
Show More
Peter Singer posits in his article “Famine, Affluence and Morality” that many developed countries like the United States should be willing and ready to engage in activities that promote eradication or prevention of famine, disasters or calamities throughout the world. He believes that this can only be accomplished when United States like many developed nations realize that they there is a clarion call of ethical duty upon her to do so. It our opinion that this paper will explain the main objective of Singer’s works so as to understand his arguments regarding famine, affluence, and morality. The paper will also provide the main counter arguments toward his work and his reflections and reactions to those counter arguments.
Additionally, the …show more content…
He believes that many people will like to rescue him, an action that is morally right. He feels that this action is morally justified because many people will feel that it is bad to allow a child to drown. The counter argument proposes that since I am not the only person witnessing the situation, then what is the essence and reason for saving the boy. Why is it my ethical responsibility to save this child if nobody is helping? Singer postulates that we do have moral obligation to avoid bad situation from happening regardless of if everybody is interested in doing so or …show more content…
I believe that we must be flexible to let go of some affluence to save life when the need arises. I also believe that it is the moral thing to do. This is a clarion call that does not accept discrimination, or prejudice against those suffering. The fact is to imagine if we were in the same predicament, would we like to receive help or not? Therefore, I disagree that we should discriminate against anyone who is suffering because of his or her racial background, ethnicity, and distance. Most importantly, human life must be invaluable to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer Poverty
    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Peter Singer Poverty

    In this essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” Peter Singer is trying to persuade the society that the world hunger and poverty will be solved if people from wealthy society donate the money that spend on their luxuries to the aid organization. He gives two controversies examples of Dora’s situation and Bob’s situation which help to strengthen his argument. From that examples it is also supports his arguments in favor of his altruistic position. On the other hand he also address the objections to his arguments which is “fair share” and “the limit of the donation.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers Jan Narveson And Peter Singer: Moral Responsibility And Duty
    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophers Jan Narveson And Peter Singer: Moral Responsibility And Duty

    What duty do we have to help those who might otherwise starve without our intervention? Is it our responsibility to help our fellow man in need or are we free to stand on the sidelines? Philosophers Jan Narveson and Peter Singer offer contrasting viewpoints on the moral obligations affluent nations have to aid and support the poor. Where Singer reasons that by having the privilege of living in nations of wealth, this benefit carries with it the moral obligation to help those around the world who are sentenced to live in absolute poverty, if only because of where fate had them born. In response, Narveson argues Singer is mistaken: our responsibility and duty first lies to our circle and we should never insist that others take the responsibility…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Attention Whole Foods Shoppers Rhetorical Analysis
    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Attention Whole Foods Shoppers Rhetorical Analysis

    In the introduction, the author appeals to sympathy using strong and emotionally charged phrases. Saying that “the most effective ways to address hunger in poor countries have fallen out of fashion,” the author makes his readers feel anger toward the Western countries and their indifference to the issues of hunger and poverty in developing countries and in the same time share empathy toward undernourished people of Africa and other starving regions in the world. Throughout the article, the author evokes negative and criticizing emotions toward all the Western world. In the phrase “What’s so tragic about this is that we know from experience how to fix the problem,” (Paarlberg) he emphasizes that we know how to fix the problem but we are two selfish to do something for…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Narveson's Argument Analysis
    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Narveson's Argument Analysis

    Narveson’s argument provides the difference between charity and justice. In his argument, he considers the demands of justice are enforceable to all people, while charity is not. This means that, in some instance people are forced to act with justice because it is morally permissible, though, it is not permissible at all instance to force people to be charitable since, it is not morally permissible. Narveson's argument shows that the call to charity is personal and not forced. He argues that it not be right to force people to act charitably.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Famine, Affluence And Morality By Peter Singer
    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Famine, Affluence And Morality By Peter Singer

    Moral Comparability In Famine, Affluence, and Morality by Peter Singer, he argues that we are morally obligated to donate as much money to charity as we can to help limit poverty in the world. Singer explains that there are many people in the world suffering from poverty, and living very poor-quality lives as a result of poverty. He argues that poverty is morally wrong because of the suffering it promotes. Singer believes it is the moral obligation of humans to donate as much as they can to help limit the suffering of the poor in the world, without sacrificing anything moral comparability. In this paper, I will argue that Singer uses vague language to describe what the line is for moral comparability.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'
    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'

    Singer sets the stage for his argument by his first premise, which he believes most would agree too, that human suffering and death due to a deficiency of food, shelter, and medical aide are bad (231). Secondly, he states that if it is in one’s power to prevent something bad from happening, without having to sacrifice anything of equal moral importance, we morally ought to do it. He implies that…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty By Peter Singer
    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty By Peter Singer

    What Makes the World Go Round Professor of Bioethics, Peter Singer, explains in the article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” that all prosperous people should give all money that is not needed for basic necessities to places that are in need of food and medicine. As an American, I have knowledge this argument would shake up America as a whole. This could create a world of giving up the Capitalistic ways of America and the economic food chain. On the other hand, it could create a world of kindness and less violence. Can you imagine giving up your freedom to help others?…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Of Peter Singer's Famine, Affluence And Morality, And Lifeboat Ethics
    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Of Peter Singer's Famine, Affluence And Morality, And Lifeboat Ethics

    (Intro) Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat ethics” are contradictory philosophical works that examine whether scarce resources should be shared with the poor. Singer’s argument is that “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (Singer, 1972); therefore all people become morally obligated to help the poor. While Hardin argues that ethics of a Lifeboat should be followed because there is a finite amount of resources available at our disposal (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). Both authors take extreme positions by providing opposing arguments on whether we should be involved in helping the famine or not. This essay will analyze the rational of both authors’ while trying…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Analysis Of Famine, Affluence, And Morality By Peter Singer
    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of Famine, Affluence, And Morality By Peter Singer

    In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer discusses the moral obligation of humans to prevent bad things from happening. In particular, Singer focuses on the prevention of the famine in East Bengal during November 1971 where many people were dying from poverty. Singer argues that since global poverty may be inhibited through charitable donations, then individual people ought to be morally obligated to donate what Singer defines as their surplus of money to charities that will aid impoverished nations. Singer writes his article in the format of a thought experiment, in which he presents a number of generally agreeable premises that lead up to his conclusion which is to donate as much money to charity as what Singer determines is reasonable.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    John Arthur's Argument Analysis
    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Arthur's Argument Analysis

    Summary John Arthurs has a unique stance on world hunger and moral obligation and the way that we should handle these issues. He opens up his argument by analyzing one of Pete Singers rules “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it. “(666) Arthur believes that rule of life is a flawed one. He counters this statement by giving a scenario using Singers moral rule. Arthur states “All of us could help others by giving away or allowing others to use our bodies.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism: John Stuart Mill And Peter Singer
    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism: John Stuart Mill And Peter Singer

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Obligation: The Case Against Singer By Peter Singer
    • 2138 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Moral Obligation: The Case Against Singer By Peter Singer

    Peter Singer ultimately believes that we are morally obligated to help those who need help and are suffering. He provides various arguments that support his belief that everyone should help the dying people of East Bengal. He starts off by assuming one thing, “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad.” This assumption serves as a foundation for his many claims since it provides a definition for what he considers bad. Furthermore, his first claim is that we are morally obligated to stop bad things from happening only if we do not have to sacrifice something of equal value.…

    • 2138 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Summary
    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Summary

    In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, Hardin argues about “a world that must solve real and pressing problems of overpopulation, hunger and moral duty.” Hardin sets the stage by first giving his analysis on the structure of the world today by describing the earth as a lifeboat rather than a spaceship. He then dives into how population control, the tragedy of the commons and immigration are some of the main reasons for the problems we have today. Hardin argues that simply helping people and giving charitably will not solve these problems. Peter Singer, in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” seemingly goes against Hardin by saying that “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Singer's Argument Analysis
    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Singer's Argument Analysis

    In this paper I will reconstruct Singer’s argument as well as argue why his argument is unsound. In Singer’s paper, Famine, Affluence and Morality, he argues that any kind of suffering from lack of food, healthcare and shelter is a bad thing. He further argues that if we have the ability to prevent something bad from happening, that it is our duty as moral beings to prevent suffering unless we have to sacrifice something of significant moral importance. In class we called it the prevent suffering principle. An example that Singer gives is of the prevent suffering principle is to imagine a young child drowning in a shallow pond.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Garret Hardin And Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor
    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Analysis Of Garret Hardin And Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor

    Poverty, poor, and overpopulation are becoming major issues in today 's society. As time goes by, it becomes awfully clear that these issues are problems we must deal with. While many want to address and solve these issues, there tends to be a divide on how to do so. There are many papers available concerning this problem. The two I find to have the strongest arguments are actually quite contradicting.…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings