Famine Affluence And Morality Peter Singer Summary

1242 Words 5 Pages
Peter Singer posits in his article “Famine, Affluence and Morality” that many developed countries like the United States should be willing and ready to engage in activities that promote eradication or prevention of famine, disasters or calamities throughout the world. He believes that this can only be accomplished when United States like many developed nations realize that they there is a clarion call of ethical duty upon her to do so. It our opinion that this paper will explain the main objective of Singer’s works so as to understand his arguments regarding famine, affluence, and morality. The paper will also provide the main counter arguments toward his work and his reflections and reactions to those counter arguments.
Additionally, the paper will also include Singer’s idea of marginal utility and the application of principles of duty and charity in order to provide concrete arguments in support of his argument. The question is: Should the advanced nations or rich countries come to the rescue, and assistance of poorer nations in the event of disaster and calamity? I believe that everyone must make all efforts to assist and contribute in the event of disaster and calamity even if we have to be flexible in our beliefs, values and personal assumptions as long as it does not jeopardize our existence.
First, the main objective of Singer
…show more content…
As human beings we must provide shelter, food, protection and other cares to those who need them. We must be willing to think about others who need our help. Many are around us who suffer and may expire if we fail to act so that they get the kinds of help or assistance they need. It is our moral duty, an act of charity and responsibility to cater for the needy especially those who continually cry for assistance regardless of the distance when we come across them or hear about them. Don’t Give

Related Documents