Eco Saboteurs

Amazing Essays
1. Partridge means that humans have moral responsibilities towards people that they do not know individually and who may not even exist at the present. He uses a metaphor about a campsite to explain his argument: when they have finished camping at a campsite, a person has a moral obligation to clean it for the next person who will use it. While they do not know this person, they still have good reason to believe that someone will eventually come to use the campsite in the future and that by not cleaning the campsite they are wrongfully causing harm to this future person. He is effectively arguing that a person being “nonexistent is, morally speaking, nonrelevant” (59). In essence, morality is not solely based around a group of living people …show more content…
In recent years, there have been an increasing number of acts of Eco-sabotage committed in the name of protecting the environment. Michael Martin defines Eco-sabotage as acts which are illegal, non-public, morally or religiously motivated done with the goal of hampering a process or act which they believe is causing harm to the environment (294). It is important to note that Eco-saboteurs make every attempt to not be arrested for their crimes; their aim is to immediately and directly stop what they believe is harming the environment. Many other Eco-activists criticize this tactic because it only gains short-term results and can actively hamper attempts for long term reform. Eco-saboteurs usually counter this by only committing acts of Eco-sabotage against targets that they believe require drastic action or targets that are unlikely to be peacefully reformed without being pressured by their actions. However this rationalization often leads to further problems. Eco-sabotage is by definition illegal. By passing laws or ruling that are desired by Eco-saboteurs, even for unrelated reasons, courts and lawmakers set a dangerous precedent: that breaking the law is a legitimate and effective means of achieving ones goals. Few if any governments are willing to set this precedent and deal with its long term consequences. This often causes governments to resist passing Eco-friendly laws when Eco-sabotage is a major issue, often causing more damage to the environment in the long run that could have been stopped if less destructive means of protest where used. As a result many argue that this, quite justified, government response makes eco-sabotage ineffective and that even if it were effective that the results would be overshadowed by the long term effects of the precedent that it

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Geo Engineering Problems

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many people are unaware of the practices that certain governments want to put in place and the ones that are already in place. The rights approach deals with respecting the moral rights of all of those involved; however, these are global impacting projects that will have repercussions in all living things. We do not know how this technology will affect crops and farm lands, or what new diseases it will trigger. Humanity has the moral right to know what is going on as well as to have an opinion since this will ultimately affect everyone. In this approach the technology is falling short of being deemed ethical.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ethics Of Dumping Essay

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Dumping products in third world countries is a moral problem. The companies which manufactured these products are searching profitable venues only; they are not considering the consequences to the people that might be affected. The only benefactors are the companies who make profit, not the people in the poor countries who will be affected nor the environment and animals. If a product is regarded as unsafe to sell in the United States, then it should never be allowed to be dumped into other counties. First because, it is still considered unsafe no matter which country it is in.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Release the Green Marijuana is an herb mistaken for a drug and is looked upon as dangerous, when in fact it is anything but dangerous. Because of people’s ignorance and lack of knowledge within marijuana, it has become illegal for all the wrong reasons and should greatly be reconsidered for legalization. There is so much wrong being said about marijuana. However, legalizing marijuana would benefit the country in many ways, such as; taxing marijuana, healing sickness, and the reasoning is not legitimate. Marijuana is too expensive for the justice system, it should definitely be taxed to support beneficial government programs.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Supporters claim that internet censorship could filter out viruses that would target big businesses and access all of their information, which would eventually hurt the economy. However, it is highly unlikely that big businesses would not have the funds to attain proper security software and hire competent staff to prevent this from happening. Smaller businesses may not be able to do so, but they would likely not have a profound effect on the economy if they were to go out of business, and certainly not as much of an effect as large corporations. Supporters also argue that internet censorship could prevent file sharing by blocking file sharing sites, which would benefit musicians and film companies who suffer losses from people illegally downloading their content for free. While it is possible that this could mostly prevent this from occurring, it is likely that some people would find a way around this.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Elite of the Greenpeace decides the campaign goals and agenda, even if the other members might be against it. Most of the main decision-makers don’t have a scientific background. Furthermore, the most important organisation members are making campaigns which include sensationalism, misinformation and fear. Basically everything chemical and GMO is bad, no matter how many lives it could save, fear and political agendas have trumped science and truth. Greenpeace’s main goal has been putting an end to industrial growth, which might ban many useful techonologies.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, their efforts did not meet the standards listed in the NSPE Code of Ethics. As a result, the engineers share some of the blame in the Challenger Disaster. However, while identifying the key issues and causes of the disaster is very important, searching for a specific group of people to blame will not help prevent future disasters. While it may be tempting to place all of the blame on the management or the engineers or even NASA in general, this approach simplifies the case and is simply erroneous. The only way to prevent future disasters like this one is to…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It can be beneficial or even life saving at times to break the law, but it is not acceptable to break the law at all times. There are exceptions to the law, and they need to be recognized when the time is right. Imagine if a government started to kill its own people in an uncontrollable and psychotic manner. This would be a time where the people would have to rebel, or fight back, against the governing body in control. The law would be broken because attacks to this scale would be illegal, but it is all in an effort to save harmless civilians being murdered by an irrational higher power.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unfortunately, different hackers see different moral boundaries in the attempt to achieve the end goal. Furthermore, this hacktivist stereotype is further fed if the hackers hold the view that Pierluigi mentions, “Those members [certain Anonymous members] that act just to refuse any social rules… profess themselves anarchists, they operate to destroy and create chaos” (“Anonymous Ethical code. Back to the origins”). No one can deny the immorality of certain actions done by activists, but some appear to be ignorant of the positive…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Others argue that by denying the use of DDT we are killing people because it was not until DDT was miraculously was introduced that fever or other diseases claimed so many lives. DDTs live-saving properties should not be lost according to it's supporters. However, it is not only the use of these pesticides that is the problem Carson addressed, is the fact that we refuse to look at the negative impact that these have in humans. There are different methods that can be employed that will destroy the insects but will not have as much…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For many centuries humanity has relied on the environment for a number of resources, but now it is becoming too serious. The resources we need are harming innocent creatures, and even putting humans lives in danger. The world needs resources to survive, but it is getting out of hand. The world needs to be safer while extracting these resources and needs to learn how to use a safe amount without causing damage to the world. The world is killing our environment with needs which have lead to a decline in resources, a decline in the environment and global warming.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays