Default Mode Networks

Improved Essays
When discussing political topics, most people cannot be persuaded to change their mind. They are firmly rooted in their beliefs and in a way, the beliefs make people who they are (Resnick). A psychologist who works for the University of Southern California set out to determine why our brains receive conflicting beliefs as personal attacks. The psychologist, Jonas Kaplan, concluded that the default mode network is triggered to a greater degree when presented with an opposing political belief versus when presented with conflicting mundane facts (Resnick).
The default mode network refers to different brain structures that work together to control and also regulate a person’s identity. Kaplan used a fMRI to observe which areas of the brain were

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the profession of IT a key component in your job will be looking after networks keeping them operational (for the users whom use the network), safe (clean out any corrupt files, check security measures, look for a virus. Etc…) and secure (making sure only authorise users are accessing the network). But first what is a network in a general meaning? A network consists of two or more computers that are connected in order to share resources (such as printers), exchange files, or electronically communicate. The computers on a network can be linked through various ways such as cables, telephone lines, radio waves, satellites, or infrared light beams.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In all respects, their research suggests that individuals are “hardwired” to be either liberal or conservatives. Predisposed is defined in the book as the standing orientations that have a measurable biological - though not necessarily innate…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Varicella Vaccination Program Success” by Steven Novella, the author argues about the people who does not believe in vaccines and how are their arguments formulated. They ignore all the information and statitistics and focus on the smaller problems caused in the investigation, to assure that vaccines are not effective and riskful. However, besides all this, the author states at the end that we should follow more closely the vaccines programs and know that they are useful with the proper regulations. Moreover, Novella starts the article talking about the cognitive dissonance, which is “the state of mind that results when conflict arises between perceived reality and the cherished or learned facts, values, and beliefs regarding that reality.”,…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth Kolbert's article, “Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds,” in the New Yorkers February 2017 issue looks at some main ideas in three different psychological books about patterns in human reasoning and attempts to connect them to today’s politics. Her explanation of the studies and their outcomes were superb, though she could have done a better job at connecting these points to her political conclusion. It is difficult to distinguish what her main point is. She starts the article by describing a couple experiments done at Stanford on human reasoning.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Audiences with low ego-involvement typically do not possess strong attitudes towards a subject, positively or negatively. If presented properly via peripheral persuasion cues (e.g. credibility, visual stimulation, etc.), arguments either for or against a topic can be effective persuasion. However, any attitude change is not long-lasting and can be reversed with an equally believable argument in favor of the opposing side. In contrast, highly ego-involved audiences are firm in their positions and are not easily persuaded; the central persuasion route must be taken because peripheral cues appear transparent and flagrant to the highly ego-involved (Sereno). Nevertheless, if attitude change does occur with the central route, it is long-lasting and unlikely to change in the future.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We as humans tend to have the belief that our opinions are based on conclusions that resulted from completely rational, objective reasoning. We think that we have considered all evidence equally before arriving at a conclusion, and if we were to be presented with enough evidence opposing it, we would be quick to correct ourselves. However, people have again and again proved that this is not how we form our opinions. In reality, we have the tendency to ignore information that challenges our established beliefs, choosing to pay a disproportionate amount of our attention to information that confirms our beliefs.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine the reactions of fans at a tense hockey game when one of the team’s captain just received a penalty with two minutes left of the game. Would opposing fans have a different opinion about how just the call was, even though both saw the situation? Most likely. And while one may think that this difference may only exist for subjective matters, a study conducted on Dartmouth and Princeton students in 1951 proves otherwise. Even though both groups of students should have been able to count (objective task) the same amount of infractions made by each team shortly after watching a video of the game, Princeton students ‘saw’ the Dartmouth team make twice as many infractions as the Dartmouth team ‘saw’ themselves make.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daring Greatly by Brene Brown What does it mean to be vulnerable? Vulnerability is defined as, “the quality or state of being exposed to the possibility of being attacked or harmed, either physically or emotionally” (Dictionary.com). In Brene Brown’s book, Daring Greatly, she talks about the truth of vulnerability. Based on twelve years of research, Dr. Brene Brown dispels the myth that vulnerability is weakness and argues that it is, in truth, the most accurate measure of courage.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine you are a teenage girl who actively believes in ideas that differ from the rest of society. In addition to this, you are born in the tumultuous times of the Nazi Era. How would you react? Would you conform to society’s standards and expectations or stay true with what you believe is morally right? It is a natural human instinct to feel the need to adapt and “fit in,” so that others accept us.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Politics cognitive dissonance is often used as a strategy to persuade voters. Cognitive dissonance is when a action conflicts with beliefs or preferences, as a result people change their beliefs or preferences to match their actions; “But precisely how to move voters successfully is a matter still not fully understood—and the raison d'etre for political strategists and pundits” (Paragraph 1). Harvard and Stanford universities have concluded that political attitudes are often a result of one’s own actions. These political attitudes can change as a result of cognitive dissonance, “…people adjust their political preferences in order to downplay cognitive dissonance…”(Paragraph 7).…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alleviating Cognitive Dissonance In the chapter “Quieting the Mind” of the book, Opening Skinner’s Box, author Lauren Slater examines the theory of cognitive dissonance. Leon Festinger, a psychologist at the University of Minnesota, originally introduced the theory of cognitive dissonance to psychology in 1957. The basic way of thinking about cognitive dissonance is that it refers to a situation when two or more cognitive elements (such as behaviors and attitudes/ beliefs) are inconsistent, causing psychological stress and discomfort. Festinger tested his theory by constructing several experiments to observe if participants changed their beliefs to be congruent with their behaviors.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drive Reduction Theory

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Another motivation theory which the candidates emphasized during this debate was the drive-reduction theory. According to this theory, a need which isn’t being fulfilled by an individual will then culminate in a drive; motivation to regain homeostasis will be the outcome of the arousal stemming from this initial drive. For example, every individual needs their viewpoints to be heard; if this does not occur, stress can result. An organism cannot survive in extended periods of stress, or any state of extended emotion for that matter. During this debate, both candidates interrupted each other.…

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book, Mistakes Were Made (but not by me), Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson are able to showcase true life accounts of people that have made wrong decisions that were either unacceptable or completely terrible, who justified their actions as if they did nothing wrong. People do this because as humans, it is too complicated for us to admit that we have done something wrong, so instead we like to cover ourselves up with justifications. This then causes for the person to make the assumption that they have not made a mistake, but instead that others that surround them do. Each person has someone to help them make choices, whether it be a personal advisor, a partner, a whole community, they are there to assist, but usually, people like to…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The distribution of ideas within in a classroom challenges students’ prior assumptions or beliefs as a result of listening to other perspectives on the subject. Unfortunately many students grow up in environments where they are only exposed to a single opinion or distinct side of an issue therefore when they engage in a meaningful discussion with their peers, where all aspects of the issue are explored, they are then finally able to develop a well-rounded individual notion on the issue. According to Stephen D. Brookfield and Stephen Preskill, “students can serve as critical mirrors for each other, reflecting the assumptions they see in each other’s positions” (p. 20, ). Not only does this experience force students to reflect about their own opinions but it makes them realize how assumptions often heavily influence beliefs. Students coming to this realization will be more likely to understand the usefulness of trying to understand why another person contains a certain belief by analyzing their prior assumptions and biases.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Every individual that has reached the age of maturity to use critical and analytical thought, has based what they know and believe on their own experiences in the real world. Perception of a given situation can drastically change from person to person, resulting in changes in what is thought to be knowledge, or belief. Over the span of an individual’s life, an interconnected web is built out of one’s beliefs, what they perceive as knowledge, and what they believe is true. Emotion has an impact on perception of a given situation. It can alter the way a person thinks about an event or idea, generating changes in the foundations of belief, and consequently changing the foundations of what that person perceives as knowledge.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays