Arguments Against Creationism

Good Essays
The evolution of man has been the topic of many controversial debates between the scientific and religious communities. There is a significant amount of scientific evidence against the idea of creationism that cannot be ignored. Yet this information doesn’t lead to humans’ origin. This supports the creationists’ argument that god created human beings. While both sides argued on the origin of human beings, the believers in Darwinism contended with scientific evidence while the believers in creationism contended with their indoctrinating beliefs. The lack of evidence on human origin has led to the development of different views surrounding its truth. The earliest scientific evidence of human beings ever existing was first documented on the …show more content…
Many modern philosiphers argue against this stating that it is too flawed; too inconsistent with modern science Christian philoshper William Pailey popularized Aquinas’ fifth argument, this argument for gods existence is modernized in today’s society and is known as the Theological argument also known as intelligent design. Pailey made his case for the existence of god by stating “the argument by analogy.” He used this argument to talk about god better known as the watchmaker analogy. Pailey states that there was a particular teleology in mind when it comes to the creation of the watch. Would we assume that the watch would come into existence on its own hence its perfect design for functioning? Or would we assume that someone created it? We would assume that the watch has a creator. He compared the watch to a living organism such as us. We as human beings are impeccably complex entities that are so fit to live almost perfectly on this world. Payley believes that there must be a creator for mankind for we did not just come into existence on our own. Pailey says that, “Bodies are purposeful, and from there concludes that the purpose had to have been put there by an intelligent creator.” But skeptics argue another explanation for how we came to have the complexity and functionality we have today is from random mutation and natural

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    What is the core differences between creationism and evolutionism? Creationism and Evolutionism(both atheistic and theistic evolutionism) are contradicting theories that try to explain the nature of organismal evolution, they are two very different theories. Creationism states that God does exists and he does interfere in the universe. Creationist believe in the design arguments and believe all that all complexities in our universe are products of intelligent design. While the two different interpretation of evolutionism, atheistic and theistic, both state that evolution happened and makes a biological argument towards evolution, they do contradict on the existence of God.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This process of evolution allows for species to adapt to the environment. This clearly opposes creationism, which is the religious belief that God created everything and life is the product of God’s creation. Evolutionary creation almost marries both concepts and determines that without God the process of evolution would be impossible. I believe this notion of origin is a lot more acceptable for many people caught in between the ideas of biblical interpretation and scientific…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When, in the course of human events, people debate a variety of topics, but some ideas become foggier rather than clear when the information is debated. The scientific theory that is Darwinism is often debated against the creation account in Genesis, or the faith-based theory. Darwin’s theory of evolution juxtaposed against the Genesis creation account allows for one to believe fully in only one of these creation accounts when discussing the creation of man, despite having other beliefs on various ideas. Darwin’s Theory of Evolution provides scientific evidence to suggest that humans came from an evolution of different species throughout the course of time. For example, Darwin’s theory is based on the idea that all life on earth is connected in some way, as well as, that the idea of natural selection has allowed for species to evolve over time.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    POPPER, KUHN AND LATOUR'S EVALUATION OF THE ARGUMENTS Popper's philosophy is based on falsifiability, thus he would side with Lennox. There are a lot of gaps in the science when it comes to evolution and the origin of life. There are also a lot of phenomenons that Dawkins cannot explain by using pure science, because he believes that the specific explanations have not been discovered yet. Lennox uses falsifiability as his main argument in many situations to counter Dawkins' theories. Lennox uses God to explain all of these phenomenons and because God cannot be falsified by using science, Popper would side with Lennox rather than Dawkins.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the essay, “Evolution as Fact and Theory,” Stephen Gould defenses Charles Darwin’s theory of Evolution over the beliefs of creationist on God creating all organisms in the world. To further his support, he states his three arguments which are observational evidence, the imperfection of nature, and transitions found in fossil records to demonstrate that even though evolution is just a theory, there are plentiful evidence of facts that supports it. The essay was not just about justifying the theory of evolution to the creationist but also to reject the ideas of blindfolded views on scientific creationism. Throughout the essay, Gould acknowledges many of the major perspectives of the scientific world to support the theory of evolution that…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Creationism versus evolutionism is a controversy topic where facts from a different expert can be arguably for each side, whether you support or deny. From the first argument, I believe in the heterodox way of thinking because I did not see any convincing or reliable argument for the orthodox way of thinking. Also, I chose to believe in the theory of evolutionism because it was based on structural and convincing information which was more solid than the theory of…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    And lastly, creation scientists must uphold scientific theories with integrity. Ruse believes that creation scientists do not treat evolution science fairly by not upholding it to the same standard they do with…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Evolution was created by Darwin, and instead of humans being a divine creation by God; we are supposedly evolved mammals. This impacts scientist tremendously and unless they believe in evolution and their science reflects that they will be unlikely to be associated with major universities. I disagree with evolution and all that it stands for. I have studied evolution and creationism, and the evidence for creationism is exponentially greater than evolution. This is not brought up by the author, but he does not back up creationist with facts.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Modern Science Vs Religion

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Those who are strong in their faith usually have a hard time accepting that there is a possibility that God or Gods did not create the world how it is today. Those who strongly believe in scientific discoveries and progress also have a hard time accepting that there is a possibility that a God or even multiple Gods created everything living as it is today. There is evidence supporting both belief systems, as pointed out in the texts from which they originate. What the extremists from both parties do not realize or accept is that both ideas can explain the origin of the world and humankind. This non-acceptance of the truth is the result of centuries of religion being in control of society.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Atheism Vs Religion

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This essay intends to prove the idea that atheism would eventually trump over religion. These arguments for the dominance of atheism can be categorized under philosophical, historical and social perspectives. One of the chief reasons is the lack of empirical proof of the existence of god. People have overtime assumed this existence based…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays