Blake Mycoskie's Utilitarian Ethics

Improved Essays
Utilitarian Ethics is defined as the ethics of beneficial consequences or outcomes. It also states that no action is morally wrong or right in itself but depends on the circumstances.
Happiness, pleasure and the absence of pain, is the only thing universally desirable. Some actions can be justified on utilitarian principles as being morally justified if it obtains the maximum overall happiness. Blake Mycoskie, the founder of Toms shoes, uses child poverty as his business model. Poverty will always be a part of this world. He based his business knowing that it always will be. He started the famous “one for one” slogan. This alone makes it clear he needs both the clientele to make his business successful. His idea was to give away a pair of shoes for every pair that has been bought. He has
…show more content…
No one truly knows Blake Mycoskie’s intentions except Blake Mycoskie himself, but, even so, as his business grows so does the amount of children he helps. Weather it is true or not, it is still effective. In Confucian Ethics Ren is said to be the equality of moral worth. Ren must have human’s co-existence and co-identity to work. Toms recognizes both classes of people and that they need each other to work. Neither are more important, they are all people, it does not matter which ones have money or not. Without the people buying shoes the people in poverty would not be receiving them and without the people in poverty the people buying them would have no one to help. I think his “one for one” mantra implies this well. It makes it seem like both parts are completely equal and important. In the Normative Ethics book, it also talks about compassion and empathy as a way to form a bond with other humans. Mycoskie recognizes the pain and the need the children have; he does what he can to help and change their lives for the better. He plays on the emotions of the people buying the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What duty do we have to help those who might otherwise starve without our intervention? Is it our responsibility to help our fellow man in need or are we free to stand on the sidelines? Philosophers Jan Narveson and Peter Singer offer contrasting viewpoints on the moral obligations affluent nations have to aid and support the poor. Where Singer reasons that by having the privilege of living in nations of wealth, this benefit carries with it the moral obligation to help those around the world who are sentenced to live in absolute poverty, if only because of where fate had them born. In response, Narveson argues Singer is mistaken: our responsibility and duty first lies to our circle and we should never insist that others take the responsibility…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Narveson’s argument provides the difference between charity and justice. In his argument, he considers the demands of justice are enforceable to all people, while charity is not. This means that, in some instance people are forced to act with justice because it is morally permissible, though, it is not permissible at all instance to force people to be charitable since, it is not morally permissible. Narveson's argument shows that the call to charity is personal and not forced. He argues that it not be right to force people to act charitably.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Peter Singer’s argument, the reader is forced to analyze the morality of their day-to-day lives. Singer’s ethical argument challenges ordinary consumers to change their unnoticeable immoral routines of disregarding charitable donations. He argues there is no moral difference between a man letting a child drown so his shoes are not ruined and someone buying luxury items instead of donating that money to a relief agency. In this paper, I will clarify any relevant terminology, elucidate Singers argument, discuss the claims on a moral difference, and ultimately defend the claim that proximity is not morally relevant. Clarifying any terminology: moral duty or obligation means a duty which one owes, and which he ought to preform, but which he…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyday millions of people around the world suffer in circumstances, in which they could die from lack of proper care and resources. In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer acknowledges this issue facing humanity and argues for the moral obligation to give large amounts of money to those in need. Singer believes that all who are able should be giving up many, if not all of their luxuries to help give the less fortunate their necessities. I will begin by summarizing the argument that Singer dictates in his article and then explain my reasoning for believing his notions to be sound and valid.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Makes the World Go Round Professor of Bioethics, Peter Singer, explains in the article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” that all prosperous people should give all money that is not needed for basic necessities to places that are in need of food and medicine. As an American, I have knowledge this argument would shake up America as a whole. This could create a world of giving up the Capitalistic ways of America and the economic food chain. On the other hand, it could create a world of kindness and less violence. Can you imagine giving up your freedom to help others?…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reading this essay in hope of finding a definite answer to whether or not Australia has any sort of moral obligations to help developing countries however I cannot speak for an entire country but I can give you reasons for and against helping countries in need. This essay cannot speak for an entire country for a couple of reasons. Firstly, Australia is so full of diversity, there is nowhere in Australia without at least 10 different cultures. In saying that, every culture’s morals are different.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay #1 In the beginning of the semester, we were given the basic requirements for any good ethical theory. In this essay, I will discuss how well utilitarianism measures up against the 14 requirements. Utilitarianism is an action is morally right if it creates the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people.…

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” 795 million people in the world, roughly one out of every nine, do not get enough food to live a healthy life. More than three billion, nearly half of the world’s population, live on less than $2.50 a day. Peter Singer, an altruistic professor of bioethics, created a highly complimented and criticized resolution for ending world poverty. The most prominent point of “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” is this: “the formula is simple: whatever money you’re spending on luxuries, not necessities, should be given away”. This idea of everyone donating their excess income would work in a perfect world, but it is not that easy.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that results in the best action to promote and maximize utility. The idea behind this theory is to maximize pleasure while minimizing pain. However, utilitarianism is not a feasible moral theory and it cannot…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cycle Of Selfishness

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages

    “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, but from their regard to their own interest.” This quote speaks to everyone participating in society. Generally speaking, charity, while a virtuous act, cannot provide a living alone. A baker produces bread to sell to consumers to produce an income. He does not simply give out the bread at no cost for his own benevolence, he does it to make a living.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Peter Singer Argument

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The underlying goal of philosophy is to help humans seek the ultimate truth to the questions that orbit their knowledge for the meaning of existence. One question that many philosophers are challenging themselves to answer would be that of just how far individuals should go in order to provide relief for those who are suffering from poverty. After attaining a degree in bioethics, a professor by the name of Peter Singer recently ventured to provide the world with an answer to the question that had been protruding the minds of many philosophers. Singer claims, “The formula is simple: whatever money you’re spending on luxuries, not necessities, should be given away.” Although Singer’s argument proposes an idea that could be beneficial towards…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism In Lying

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When a friend constantly tells me, I look “gorgeous and you’re not fat”. However, in reality, I am self-conscious and I gained a lot of weight. This is a lie, the reason she tells me this is because she wants to help boost my confidence and not hurt my feelings. She knows that I am self-conscious about my appearance. Nevertheless, hearing it constantly doesn’t help me, but makes me feel more self-conscious of my body and hurts my emotions.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism What is utilitarianism? It is a theory of normative ethics that straightforwardly identifies good or bad, moral or immoral. It answers the question with an analysis focusing on whether a particular action or type of action makes people happy, and if so, it is good. Utilitarianism asserts that the right action is the one that most increases the happiness of the most number of people involved.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    VI. Utilitarian Analysis Utilitarian ethics focuses on the consequences of an action. When academics put their Utilitarian “hat” on, they are looking for the actions that provide the maximum benefits to society, while producing the minimum harms. In other words, they are looking for net good over net bad (Treviño & Nelson, 2014).…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays