The two poems, The Passionate Shepherd to His Love and The Nymph's Reply to the Shepherd, each share their own insight on their life. The second poem is a depressing reply to the first poem, which tries its hardest to get his lady to come stay with him and love him forever. It shows happiness and joy, while the second one points out why they could never be together forever. The response to the Shepherd uses three main reasons not to move in with him, all the beauty he promises will die, that everything he's promising her will change over time, and that if nothing were to change and they could live young and in love forever she would totally go and live with him forever. I think that the way she says it is extremely hurtful and I don't approve.
The Nymph first says, that everything he thinks is going to bloom is actually going to die. He lists off a great quantity of flowers and plants in his poem, then in the Nymph’s, she says that all those flowers will die as soon as winter approaches. She states, “The flowers do fade, and wanton fields, To wayward winter reckoning yields…”(Ralegh 12 & 13) To me, this symbolizes that as soon as trouble arises, their whole world will fall apart and die and that it would only bring sorrow for them both. I don’t think she is really thinking this whole …show more content…
He tries to tell her that they will watch the sheep wander and they will sit upon rocks and enjoy the stream. The Nymph, however, says that,”Time drives the flocks from field to fold, When Rivers rage and Rocks grow cold…”(Ralegh 5 & 6) This symbolizes that nothing he’s trying to promise will stick around while they’re together and that it will all go cold as the time passes. I really hope she changes her mind because this guy is pretty