Comparing Hobbes And Hsun Tzu

Improved Essays
The nature of humanity is born to be evil. Mencius believes that nature is good, but Thomas Hobbes and Hsun Tzu helped me come to the conclusion of why we are so evil. It is human nature to do as we please even if it is not the best thing to do. Although, we are taught to love others we overpower it by our evilness. The nature of humans are evil because we are sinful, everyone wants to be better than someone else, and we are influenced by our environment around us.

We were born to commit sins. “One is born with feelings of envy and hate, and, by indulging these, one is led into banditry and theft, so that the sense of loyalty and good faith with which he was born disappears” (Hsun Tzu, The Xunzi:“Human Nature Is Evil”, para. 1). There

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes Vs Erasmus

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Advice to Young Leaders Response Paper #3: Erasmus and Hobbes Both Thomas Hobbes and Erasmus, although born of different time periods, were political philosophers with humanist training. However, their similarities to not end there, as they both sought to provide a comprehensive framework for leadership through their works of The Education of a Christian Prince and Leviathan respectively. While Hobbes and Erasmus hold similar views on the structure of a state and that of man, they sharply disagree on the qualities that make a good leader. Hobbes and Erasmus generally agree upon the nature of the state, although their views begin to subtly diverge when it comes to the nature of the citizens that populate them and their obligations to their…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are enlightenment thinkers who came up with different opinions dealing with human nature.” (Yost, lecture notes) Thomas Hobbes believed that “humans were naturally selfish, greedy, and cruel.” (Yost, lecture notes) People are naturally evil because they grow up having to be taught right from wrong, are born without values essential to being good, and have selfish notions.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another difference that I noticed in reading and comparing Machiavelli and Hobbes was seeing how they believe how a ruler or sovereign should act. Machiavelli in his book The Prince explains “It is better to be feared then loved” (Machiavelli 2006). He also shares how as a ruler, you should avoid hatred. Hatred gets one more power than just being loved, but people will not obey you if one is hated by all. So Machiavelli achieves this in a sneaky way.…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Watterson-Calvin and Hobbes, Sabbatical, and Commercialization When starting off writing Calvin and Hobbes, Bill was advised not to quit his day job as a large number of comic strips never make it past a few years. The income for a beginner cartoonist wasn’t high paying but neither was his day job so as soon as he was making equal amounts from both jobs he went against the advice of the editor of the syndicate and quit his day job. The editors turned down many of his rough ideas but he chose to go with their decision as he felt if it was good enough to be published he would not have to defend it. As he expounded the characters of both Calvin and Hobbes he began to see himself reflected in them. As quoted in the introduction of The Complete Calvin and Hobbes Book One “Hobbes got all my better qualities (and a few quirks from our cats), and Calvin got my ranting escapist side.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I was recently made aware of a Calvin and Hobbes comic strip that closely relates to my theory of human nature and the need for a system of leadership. In this comic strip a child named moe pushes calvin, a weaker child, off the swing. This is a perfect example of the people in their natural state. Here we see the inconvenience of human interaction. Why is this ruthlessness allowed without punishment, you ask?…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Condorcet was an enlightenment philosopher that believed humans are inherently good and therefore are capable of indefinite perfection. He lived in the enlightenment period, so his view of human nature is based solely on what he could perceive through his observations and reason. He doesn’t believe in superstitions and thinks that they will soon be replaced by knowledge, reason, and liberty. Condorcet supports his theory with the premises; any healthy human’s faculty of reason is capable of understanding society and nature, there is no inherent conflict between the mind and the body, and that a person’s interests are paralleled with others interests. These premises support his conclusion that humans are inherently good and as a result are capable of indefinite perfection.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Response To Mencius

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    So if someone is evil or bad it doesn't mean they are not capable of being good. Philosopher Kao Tzu views differ on human nature. He believed, “humans are neither … good nor ... evil, [he states], The nature of things is like swirling water”(Mencius 94-95). Water takes the shape of whatever it's put in. You put it in a jar, a bowl, a glass, a bucket it will take that shape.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant and Hobbes have extremely inverse comprehension of the issue of ethical quality . This uniqueness was instructed by their moving idea structures. Kant took a more rationalistic point of view towards profound quality, while Hobbes was more experimental in nature. In any case, both proceeded from a subjective point. That is to express that they received a human instinct centered system to issues of profound quality.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle Vs Hobbes

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If prompted, the majority of Western society would likely agree that government originates from our consensual participation in the state. However, even among those who are in consensus regarding the emergence of the civil state, there is a discrepancy in how they perceive the purpose of government; there are those that advocate intensive government involvement, stringent policies, and an ideology akin to the Hobbesian understanding that humans are basically brutish and ruled by their self-interest. Apart from them would be those who prefer a partnership between the government and the governed; the state being a means to protect natural rights and promote general well-being, similar to the conclusions detailed in Aristotle’s Politics. Reflecting…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Before the introduction of sovereignty, man withered in the state of nature. Sovereignty, enabling the authority of the state to govern itself, did not mirror the times of Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Hobbes living in a time of a civil war in England and Rousseau in the mists of the French Revolution wrote novels, The Leviathan and On the Social Contract, entailing the creation of a sovereign state from their times of distress. Though a century apart, these theorists did not coincide with their respective times. Hobbes denounced religion and the divine ruling of God for secular authority of a king, and Rousseau even further went against the ruling of a monarchy, for a republic that gave the people power.…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), generally accepted as the father of Romanticism, believed that humans are born basically good and that original sin does not exist in the human heart (Hergenhahn & Henley, 2014, p. 198). This is Rousseau’s basic point behind the statement “Man is born free yet we see him everywhere in chains” (Rousseau, as cited in Hergenhahn & Henley, 2014, p. 198). People, as inherently good, do not require governing, whether by the state, the Church, or any other social institution. It is society and its attempts to control individuals that lead to harmful behavior. In this sense, Rousseau disagreed with Hobbes who also believed that in order to understand humans, one needs to recognize natural impulses.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One can argue that man’s human nature is both inherently good and evil, but it is through the sin of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden that each generation born after them was no longer born without shame, which Hsun Tzu does a great job of showing how man’s nature is inherently evil. Hsun Tzu was a Chinese scholar who followed the Confucian belief who lived from 300-230 BCE. He wrote this piece of literature explaining how man is not born with an innocent or pure nature, meaning that in the eyes of God when we are born we are born sinful. If this was not the case, and Mencius was correct about humans being pure in nature then no one would have the urge to murder, steal or anything that we consider to be sinful today. However, this is not…

    • 1825 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Human Nature? Humanity is difficult to define, but Chinese philosophers, Master Kao and Hsun Tzu, seem to have their own understanding about what humanity is. Tzu states that “our nature is born evil and his nature cannot be learned or worked for” (84). Kao states “humans are born as a ‘blank slate’ (neutral) and can be conditioned into either good or evil” (78).…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I am going to compare and contrast the writings and ideas of Immanuel Kant and Thomas Hobbes. Both Kant and Hobbes speak on the subject of obedience to those who hold the power in society. While Kant ([1798] 1996) in his writing, “What is Enlightenment?” discusses how you may argue with those in authority as long as you obey, Hobbes ([1651] 2013) in his book “Leviathan” talks about how we cannot argue with the Sovereign because his will is our will and to argue with him is to argue with yourself, therefore you must obey him in all things. While Kant and Hobbes may have been similar minded on the subject of obedience, they do have differing opinions on who should be allowed to reason within society. Kant ([1798] 1996) believes that everyone should have the ability to reason for himself, while Hobbes ([1651] 2013) states that the Sovereign should reason for us.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays