“He argues allegiance to the State is more important than one’s well-being or ties to their family” (Leonard). This shows how much Socrates was in contradiction of breaking laws under all circumstances. Socrates was so against breaking the law, that even when he thought he was not guilty and in jail for corrupting youthful people and not believing in the gods, he would not escape. He is very focused on respecting the laws and not going against them for any reason. Socrates believes he is doing the right thing by not breaking the law, even if he was in a situation where breaking the law would be morally right in the …show more content…
Socrates never breaks the laws and believes it is not right to go against them no matter what the circumstance is. King is the opposite. He did not follow the laws that he believed were unjust. Morality has a lot to do with whether or not a person decides to break a law. It is all about what you believe to be right. A person is morally better off breaking an unjust law rather than not breaking the law, in certain situations. I believe it is, under certain situations, okay to break certain laws at certain time because it can potentially help many people and society. Although both sides of this argument are very strong and argued well, I am strongly on the side of Martin Luther