Martin Luther King's Argument Against Breaking The Law

Superior Essays
The law is a set of rules made to help people stay in order and keep a group, community, or country controlled and structured. People all around the world have many different views and statements of what they think about the law and how people should use them. Martin Luther King and Socrates’ are two very influential, powerful people when it comes to the laws. Socrates is one of the best known and smartest philosophy teachers in history, and Martin Luther King is one of the biggest civil right leaders. Between these two well-known individuals, there are a lot of similarities and differences on their two arguments about the laws. In this paper, I will argue that Martin Luther King has the better argument when it comes to when a person should …show more content…
“He argues allegiance to the State is more important than one’s well-being or ties to their family” (Leonard). This shows how much Socrates was in contradiction of breaking laws under all circumstances. Socrates was so against breaking the law, that even when he thought he was not guilty and in jail for corrupting youthful people and not believing in the gods, he would not escape. He is very focused on respecting the laws and not going against them for any reason. Socrates believes he is doing the right thing by not breaking the law, even if he was in a situation where breaking the law would be morally right in the …show more content…
Socrates never breaks the laws and believes it is not right to go against them no matter what the circumstance is. King is the opposite. He did not follow the laws that he believed were unjust. Morality has a lot to do with whether or not a person decides to break a law. It is all about what you believe to be right. A person is morally better off breaking an unjust law rather than not breaking the law, in certain situations. I believe it is, under certain situations, okay to break certain laws at certain time because it can potentially help many people and society. Although both sides of this argument are very strong and argued well, I am strongly on the side of Martin Luther

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    We argued that that the imprisonment of an innocent man has already undermined the Laws of Athens and so his escape would be just, in reversing the damage to the state. However, Socrates believes that one should ever wrong someone else, and he believes that his escape would undermine the Laws of Athens, and so under this justification, Socrates is justified in not escaping. We considered the idea that perhaps for Socrates his not escaping is not about political obligation but is instead a matter of maintaining his character, and if this is his true justification then he is justified in his…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Kings responded by explaining that there are two types of laws: just laws, and unjust laws. He described just laws as laws that align with moral or God’s law, and unjust laws as laws that do not align with moral law. He also described just law as law that “a majority compels a minority to follow, and is willing to follow itself,” and unjust law as law that “a majority inflicts on a minority that is not binding on itself.” Using these definitions, he argued his point that willingly disobeying certain laws is, in some cases, the moral thing to do.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He says that he has no intention of corrupting the state, saying “If I do corrupt, I do it involuntarily… and if I corrupt involuntarily, the law is not that you bring me in here for such involuntary wrongs.” He is adamant that he has no desire to harm his country, explaining to his friend in “Crito” that “It is not holy to use force against one’s mother or father, and it is so much worse to do so against one’s homeland.” Socrates is committed to the law of Athens, showing that none of his actions would be intentionally harming the nation. Like Socrates, the HLP was not intentionally endangering national security, stating that they only intended to encourage peaceful activities from the groups they associated with. Because they have no malicious intent, I believe that Socrates would not deem it just to punish the group as he would not find their activities to be a danger to the…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the Laws exist as one element, to break one would be to break every one of them, and in doing as such, Socrates would bring about them incredible damage. The citizen is bound to the Laws like a child is bound to a guardian, thus to conflict with the Laws would resemble striking a guardian. As opposed to just infringing upon the Laws and departure, Socrates ought to attempt to induce the Laws to release him. These Laws introduce the national's obligation to them as a sort of social contract. By living in Athens, a resident is bound by supporting the Laws, and complying with them.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the short stories, “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. and “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau, both of their circumstances were the same, which was to make unjust laws just. I do believe that both writers were justified in their actions because they both were doing something for the people. I believe that Martin Luther King Jr. had more justification than Thoreau did because if Thoreau had more justification what he was protesting for would have stopped all of the things he was protesting. Martin Luther king’s point of view from his letter gave the reader a better understanding of the reason he was protesting. As for Thoreau, his was very unclear, and somewhat touching on every topic and nothing in specific.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    4) Martin Luther King explained the term of his action called “Civil disobedience”. And it is nothing new. As reference the Bible, he gives the example of the refusal of some Jews to listen the law of Nebuchadnezzar which was unconfirmed to the religious and ethical law. In the same way that some Christians refused to listen to the unjust law to the Roman empire. This civil disobedience leads to the creation of academy freedom a degree due to the civil disobedience of Socrates.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The balance between the law of the state and natural, or divine law is a topic that has been scrutinized for thousands of years. Antigone by Sophocles and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. share similar standpoints on the controversial matter that has baffled philosophers. Sophocles uses Antigone to assert his opinion, as she disobeys Creon’s law and buries her brother, Polyneices. Similarly, King structures his plan of nonviolent direct action and civil disobedience to curtail racial injustice and segregation. While there are many similarities, each text has several technicalities regarding civil disobedience that differ.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For him, it was the only way to get to his goal which was to end segregation in Birmingham and in the country. Socrates view was that even though he did not commit any crime, he was going to serve his execution because it would not be good for him or the city of Athens. As a citizen, you have to obey the law; Socrates does that, but not Martin Luther…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Chicago cop cleared in unarmed woman’s shooting death”. Headlines just like this are becoming common in today’s society and the main question that the community asks is “when will justice be served?” Living in a time where the black community keeps getting shot by the police and no consequences occur, we have no choice but to question, what is justice? Similar to the modern society, the one Plato lived in confronted this same question of justice. In this paper I will attempt to explain the view that Plato places before us through Socrates in The Republic as to what is justice and does it “pay” better than injustice in society.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice can have many meanings when put into different perspectives. Throughout Crito, by Plato, Socrates has to determine whether to escape prison or stay. Socrates was initially charged with corrupting the youth and not believing in gods. He argued his case in jury and did not choose the alternate punishment, exile, which could have saved his life. He was then given a death sentence and he was imprisoned until his execution.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With his reasoning and arguments, Socrates decides to not obey the Laws of the state and proceeds with his verdict. Socrates knows that he did not truly commit a crime or disobey with the laws, but he did not want to commit an unjust action as well. Although one may not agree with the ideas and beliefs of a state, that…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people would agree that laws are something that were created to help people. Most of the help is figuring out who is right, how to handle something, or rules to follow (Behl, 2016). Hardly anyone would argue that this is a bad thing, until the law itself breaks the rules. Many laws can, in fact, contradict themselves. An example of this is the juvenile justice system and being able to wave the juvenile to adult court.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Crito, a dialogue written by Plato, the Greek philosopher Socrates is sentenced to death because of corrupting the youth, creating new gods, and being an atheist. Centuries later, another prominent figure, Martin Luther King, Jr., is jailed for civil disobedience in Birmingham, Alabama in 1963. When questioned of their imprisonment, Plato and King, Jr. are both determined to maintain justice despite the injustices charged against them, but for Plato, justice means upholding the law at all costs since one should do no wrong, whereas King is concerned with reforming the law, therefore doing wrong could make a “right”. To both King and Socrates, a portion of injustice in law damages justice as a whole.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the case of the Nazi’s manmade laws, when conforming to such laws, the obeying citizens would become criminals who do more harm than good by the act of capturing, torturing and killing Jews and other innocent human beings. On no ethical grounds can such a law that violates every basic human right can be ever justified. Obeying such a law as the one made by the Nazis would be immoral and absurd. So, as opposed to what Socrates believes, obeying the laws can cause plenty of harm. Someone who leads a life of virtue and wisdom shouldn’t inflict harm on others, even if it meant breaking the laws.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics