Marxist Theory Of Human Nature

Superior Essays
Human nature is a way to describe the characteristics of individuals, which relates to the formation and organization of society because of the morals and desires fueled by dominant voices, or collective voices.
Human nature, with a Marxist viewpoint is a way for individuals to view themselves as a member of a species, within a society that follow certain guidelines and rules in order to sustain the binary of society. The binary of society exist within the work of these theories to conceptualize human actions and morals of individuals. Individuals are species because of the ability to view ourselves as apart of this social structure, and therefore abide to the norms as a way to sustain that reality. For instance, work, has been a normative
…show more content…
The division of labor has been a main way to organize society due to the the economic dependency that society has forced onto people in order to justify the status of the elite class. The foundation of economic structures functions to secure and maintain the structure of domination, because of it’s ability to subject a certain population, in this case poor people of color, in order to develop the country through forced cheap labor. Smith idolizes the breakup of labor, because it relates to the notion of people not having the potential to full power, and therefore become reliant on economic structures for their survival. Smith highlights the division of labor as a way to get workers to perfect their one task, in order to increase and expedite mechanisms of production in order to achieve “universal opulence” ( Smith 1776: 2012:59), which enforces the objectification of workers, whereas humans are no longer viewed as a necessity to the functions of society. Rather, workers are solely recognized for their labor as it is valued and exploited for the economic structures to thrive. The division of labor contributes to the repression of self-autonomy by forcing society to become dependent on the forces of government, …show more content…
In relation to how these characteristics drive the division of labor, as one that exists in order to debunk a revolution; a way to disembark the unity of workers by keeping them separate in order to optimize and expedite the production process. Marx states, “We have shown that the worker sinks to the level of a commodity and becomes indeed the most wretched of commodities”(70). The alienation of of the workplace can replicate to the alienation of society which references the formation of society, in which workers are stripped away from products of their labor and society, thereby highlighting their limited power in making decisions about economic, political and social structures. Because workers are at the bottom of the social hierarchy spectrum, the internalization of poverty allows them to fear the outbreak of change and chaos, thus ignore their ability to fight the system and subject themselves into slave labor for a means of survival. Workers are the the biggest contributors to society, yet are positioned into a place where they feel they can be fired, taken advantage of or jobless, therefore are forced to consent to substandard wages and conditions. Limited opportunities exist for poor people of color, thereby leading them to accept the least contributions from society and governments. This in an internalized form

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    When Karl Marx (2003) talks about labour in a political economy, he argues that the workers are “degraded to the most miserable sort of commodity” (p. 6)—in other words, the workers are being exploited by owners of private property. He introduces the concept of alienation, describing how workers become externalized not only from their labour and the product of their labour, but also from their species’ being and other workers. This, as a result reduces the workers’ capabilities of seeking their greatest potential, leaving them powerless.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, I believe human nature is the characteristics, the feelings, and the behavior of every humankind. We all have human nature, and our human nature can be good and…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The new dominance of the bourgeoisie created a social class within the bourgeoisie, and thus the proletariat emerged (4-5). These “wage-laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live” (1). The creation of the proletariat was a necessary affect to bourgeoisie’s approaches of production- a superiority complex and divide for struggle naturally came about between the owners of the production and the working force (6). The bourgeois industries expanded and increased their own capital, leaving the lower class unable to compete; Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time” (6). This dissonance eventually caused corrosion within the structure of the proletariat, and this struggle created the revolutionary element which eventually destroyed the bourgeois oppressors: “What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.”…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What is Human Nature? According to Google, “Human Nature is the general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioral traits of humankind, regarded as shared by all humans.” Are we really changing as a human being? Or are we still the same and learning how to do the same thing in different way? No matter how adventure the world is, we as a human beings cannot change. In the article”, Ethics and the New Genetics”, the author, Dalai Lama argued that “All human being have an equal value and an equal potential for goodness… because there so much more to human beings than their color, language, religion and trib.” In “The Myth of Universal Love” by Stephen T. Asma, argues against Peter Singer that “all people are not equally entitled…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature is the way a human thinks, feels, and behaves. The authors; Jonathan Edwards, Olaudah Equiano, and Thomas Jefferson learn the importance of understanding human nature in Early American Texts, through written history. They all have distinctive views of human nature through the relationship of the government, law, religion, and equality. Edwards and Equiano are quite similar, believing human nature is cruel and brutal, whereas Jefferson differs from the two, believing in equality between the people. They use rhetorical strategies such as; imagery, connotative diction, and parallelism to reveal how human nature should be carefully understood to be protected from being manipulated and to understand where it stands in society.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this piece, Marx discusses the concept of “Estranged Labour”, about which he goes into great detail. He begins by stating that the current political economy takes the worker from the level of a human, to that of a commodity. He describes this as “the most wretched of commodities”, as the commodification of the worker is always done in contrast to success of the land owner. This creates two classes, the property owners and the propertyless workers, with a stark distinction between the two. The political economy that creates this distinction is run by greed, which is fueled by competition. Marx then continues to stress the connection between private property, greed, separation of labor, and capital, all of which relates back to the devaluation of man and his estrangement.This is because the worker…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature is core characteristics like feelings and behaviors that all humans share, but experience them through different perspectives. Early American authors like Thomas Jefferson, Olaudah Equiano, and Jonathan Edwards use rhetorical strategies to help convey their views on human nature in their writings throughout history. Equiano and Edwards have similar views, believing humans are naturally born evil. However, Jefferson believes in equality. These authors have different ways of conveying their message through figurative language, imagery, connotative diction, and parallelism to show their contrasting views on human nature.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    these varying traits. The central thesis of “On Human Nature” is that any common set of…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human nature is the beginning of any great political theory. Everything we are as humans relies on our basic nature. Mankind is born into a state of nature, where they are not good or bad. Instead, each child is learning how to process the world on their own. It is their circumstances in life that…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic. Given this power struggle class conflict is inherent. Marx’s critique of capitalism speculates that the proletariats…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the products of labor and the act of labor itself no longer belong to the laborer, they belong instead to the capitalist the laborer is working for. The laborer cannot help but feel disconnected from the capitalists who own the laborer’s estranged product and labor, and therefore the laborer no longer views the capitalist as a fellow human being. Rather, the laborer feels antagonistic towards the capitalist. The laborer sees the capitalist and the system the capitalist benefits from as the cause of his…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature is a theory that’s been a debated for centuries upon centuries. Philosophers have argued the concept for as long humans have been on this earth. Perhaps none the wiser than Plato, Socrates and Aristotle .The seemingly underlying truth is that there are characteristics; thinking, acting, feeling. That we all experience consciously or sub-consciously that make humans do the things that they do. The search for human nature is nothing more than the search of universal truths and finding the best way to live.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature amongst theorists differentiates tremendously. Hobbes a structural theorists, and the proclaimed father of structural theories, theorizes “that human nature stems from the fact that people want to live” (Rawlings PP 1-2). Hobbes is a theorists who believes that humans are naturally mean. He argues this because he claims every man is against every man in nature. Hobbes then argues that humans are “unable to control their desires and the more horrible you are, the more stuff you get, and the more honor you are given” (Rawlings 1-2). This is why Hobbes argues without power outside each individual society will crumble because everyone only looks out for themselves. Hobbes, argues that their needs to be something in society that helps hold a moral code amongst humans or our natural human nature tendencies may lead the society in the wrong…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In broad outline Marx 's theory asserts that in the course of making a living and utilizing their technical and industrial equipment the members of society become segregated into classes which carry on different functions in industry and therefore occupy different positions in the social organization. Between these classes there arises an antagonism of interests and a struggle” (Moore).…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the first stage, production grew due to increasing division of labour. However, this was not enough to meet the demands of ever-expanding markets. This resulted in the improvement of technical knowledge and henceforth mechanization became a hallmark of capitalism. Marx believed capitalist society to be divided into 2 main classes- the bourgeois or the capitalist class which owns the means of production, & the proletariat or the working class which sells its labour in the market. The capitalist operates on the profit motive & does not pay workers, drawn from the industrial reserve army, wages equivalent to the value created by them. The surplus value becomes the source of this profit. Further division of labour increases the alienation of workers in that they do not feel a sense of pride and ownership over the fruits of their labour. Marx uses the term ‘capitalist anarchy' to describe the inherent instability of the system due to constant revolutionizing of the instruments of production and its subjection to market forces. The concentration of property and wealth in the hands of a few, also leads to greater political centralization with laws being formulated in favour of the bourgeois. Marx applauded the move towards industrialization and urbanization for freeing men from the burden of traditional ties and sentiment and simplifying class antagonisms. He believed that capitalism harboured its own seeds of destruction. The concentration of labour in the workplace, combined with their increasing pauperization, would end their isolation and create consciousness of their exploitation. Their numbers would rise further due to the descent of the petty bourgeoisie into poverty. This will lead to greater polarization of the classes and eventually the working class will transform from a ‘class in itself' to a ‘class for itself'. According to Marx, all previous historical movements were led by…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays