Marxist Theory Of Human Nature

Better Essays
Human nature is a way to describe the characteristics of individuals, which relates to the formation and organization of society because of the morals and desires fueled by dominant voices, or collective voices.
Human nature, with a Marxist viewpoint is a way for individuals to view themselves as a member of a species, within a society that follow certain guidelines and rules in order to sustain the binary of society. The binary of society exist within the work of these theories to conceptualize human actions and morals of individuals. Individuals are species because of the ability to view ourselves as apart of this social structure, and therefore abide to the norms as a way to sustain that reality. For instance, work, has been a normative
…show more content…
The division of labor has been a main way to organize society due to the the economic dependency that society has forced onto people in order to justify the status of the elite class. The foundation of economic structures functions to secure and maintain the structure of domination, because of it’s ability to subject a certain population, in this case poor people of color, in order to develop the country through forced cheap labor. Smith idolizes the breakup of labor, because it relates to the notion of people not having the potential to full power, and therefore become reliant on economic structures for their survival. Smith highlights the division of labor as a way to get workers to perfect their one task, in order to increase and expedite mechanisms of production in order to achieve “universal opulence” ( Smith 1776: 2012:59), which enforces the objectification of workers, whereas humans are no longer viewed as a necessity to the functions of society. Rather, workers are solely recognized for their labor as it is valued and exploited for the economic structures to thrive. The division of labor contributes to the repression of self-autonomy by forcing society to become dependent on the forces of government, …show more content…
In relation to how these characteristics drive the division of labor, as one that exists in order to debunk a revolution; a way to disembark the unity of workers by keeping them separate in order to optimize and expedite the production process. Marx states, “We have shown that the worker sinks to the level of a commodity and becomes indeed the most wretched of commodities”(70). The alienation of of the workplace can replicate to the alienation of society which references the formation of society, in which workers are stripped away from products of their labor and society, thereby highlighting their limited power in making decisions about economic, political and social structures. Because workers are at the bottom of the social hierarchy spectrum, the internalization of poverty allows them to fear the outbreak of change and chaos, thus ignore their ability to fight the system and subject themselves into slave labor for a means of survival. Workers are the the biggest contributors to society, yet are positioned into a place where they feel they can be fired, taken advantage of or jobless, therefore are forced to consent to substandard wages and conditions. Limited opportunities exist for poor people of color, thereby leading them to accept the least contributions from society and governments. This in an internalized form

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Georg Lukács concept of reification refers to the reduction of people to things. As Lukacs states in History and Class Consciousness, this reification is “crucial for the subjugation of men’s consciousness” (Lukacs 1923). Reification essentially objectifies and reduces human beings to things. This concept of reification is directly linked to Marx’s ideas about commodity fetishism. Capitalist exfoliation establishes the workers and products of their labor as objects.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He defined Capitalism as more than the raw materials, products, and wealth but the exchange and social relations. In capitalism, the interests of the product owners and laborers are at war with each other. Laborers simply strive to survive and provide for themselves and their families. Owners seek to expand their wealth at the cheapest costs and beat their competition. As a result, the system is inherently unequal in the treatment of social classes and the earnings.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx developed his theory based on power within the capitalist system. He believed classes existed and there were disparities in society and those inequalities deprived lower classes of materials and resources causing conflict (Krawford, 2009). Mills took it a step further and explained that there is an elite group of powerful individuals in society that occupy positions in bureaucratic organization and large institutions in industrial societies controlling the lower classes (Elwell, 2013). These theories are more key issues as to why happiness for individuals and groups are difficult to achieve. Karl Marx focuses on the capitalist system.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx viewed the organization of society relative to its main classes, and the struggle concerning them as the engine of transformation in this structure. There are two great classes of society: the bourgeoisie, who own the means of production such as machinery and factories, and whose foundation of income is profit, and the proletariats’ who own their labor and sell it for a wage. These classes become political forces. Marx states that finally, the division between these two classes would then broaden and social structure will collapse. With the basis of classes therefore wiped away, a classless society will succeed and political power and the state will fade away.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    And all the economic systems have produced social classes, which are divided from top to bottom. Karl Marx believed that such this change is resulted from struggles between dialectical opponents. And those struggles appeared as many different types of form such as war, revolution and democratic reform. Those struggles, in fact, are derived from workers and capitalists; capitalists usually have problems, dealing with workers because the workers tend to be not interested in their jobs. Globalization, a social transformation that provides cheapest labor and resources for capitalists in order to minimize their costs, seemed emerging as a good strategy for capitalists.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In The Communist Manifesto, the oppression of the Bourgeoisie upon the proletariats results in their dehumanization. Through the exploitation of labour the proletariats diminish into a way of life that does not allow them to mindfully explore their own humanity. Proletariats will initially crave their own humanity as a means to overcome the Bourgeoisie oppression. The primary drive of a proletariat revolt lies within their need for humanization within their own self-connection and connection to each other. Labourers are alienated from craftsmanship through factory work, and thus lack in pure self-sufficiency.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essay About Middle Class

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It results from the hegemonic ideology of the ruling class that reframes the collective experiences of the middle class. This idea is important to be produced and reproduce by the knowledge regime who control the power as the instrument of power to propagandize the goodness and efficacy of capitalism to benefit to society, improve the quality of life of people. In doing so, the middle class to be an instrumental category to divide and split the position of workers as a…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Division of labour is assigning different tasks and jobs to various people, in effort to complete one big task more efficiently. Theorist Emile Durkheim argues that division of labour is beneficial to society. In his defence, he claims that division of labour is favourable in a society because it raises the skill of each worker, and creates a union between workers within the division. Durkheim also argues that division of labour helps create order within society. On the other hand, theorist Karl Marx heavily argues that division of labour is non beneficial to society because it creates differences within social classes and takes away from the unity of society.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Smith claims that employees’ ability to choose employers creates freedom, but Marx and Engels believe that is forced and involuntary because of the existing capitalist society which requires work in order to survive (Smith, p. 206). This competition enslaves individuals because of the capitalist structure they live in. Marx and Engel may argue that there may be a time in society when specialization in certain jobs is no longer required because of the advancements in technology will take over. In response to the critiques of Marx and Engels, Smith may argue that ideas drive history because materialistic reality creates ideologies, which drive the creation of machinery. This creation of machinery gives workers the opportunity to have skill, especially for those who may have little time for…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Immigrants are used as a tool for capitalist endeavors, because workers are cheap and flexible ,which divides working class organization and drives down the rule of labor power (Leon Guerrero 2016:71). Multiculturalism is a tool for the people in power, that could be politicized and turned into a conflict between different racial identities. Hana Brown — a Marxist theorist — predicts whites may feel threatened by a large or growing minority population and may think that minorities are reliant on those given resources (Leon Guerrero 2016:71). As a consequence, t divides society along racial lines, and pushes political policies to exploit radicalized tensions, thus hurting people who already suffer from economic, racial, and wealth…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays