Joel Miller Bad Trip Analysis

Improved Essays
The War on Drugs has had negative consequences on people and has not been very effective. Joel Miller in his book Bad Trip: How The War Against Drugs Is Destroying America outlines several of the negative consequences of the War on Drugs and I will discuss some of them. One of Millers biggest arguments that lay’s a foundation for his book is that he believe making drugs illegal and criminalizing them creates the circumstances for crime and violence (Miller 1). While the government approaches drugs as though they themselves are the cause of crime and violence, Miller says this is wrong because just by making something illegal does not mean you eradicate the demand for it. An illegal market will arise for the illegal substance and without the …show more content…
This has led to the militarization of the police in attitude, training, tactics and weapons (Miller 139). This is evident in the methods increasingly used by the police. Those include the use of forceful invasions and paramilitary policing. An example of this is the increased use of SWAT teams for invasions of homes (Miller 144). SWAT will forcefully enter homes with stun grenades and storm the place. Miller considers several examples of how this has been done on innocent people because a raid was conducted based on minimal information and investigation. The result was that usually someone ended up dead or injured (Miller 140). This is just one way that civilians are trapped and hurt by the war on …show more content…
civilians in several ways including increasing government invasion of privacy and allowing the police to unnecessarily seize people’s stuff but probably the biggest and worst way that civilians are affected is through mass incarceration. About 25% of all people imprisoned are there for drug related crimes and in federal prisons it is about 55% of people imprisoned (Miller 163-164). Four out of five arrests for drugs in 2005 were for the mere possession of drugs (which is not a violent crime) and one of five arrests is for selling drugs (which is not a violent crime either) (Alexander 38). Michelle Alexander, in her book The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, details how one particular group is affected my mass incarceration–African American males. According Michelle Alexander, the War on Drugs has resulted in the “systematic mass incarceration of people of color” (Alexander 38). One reason for the packing of prisons with non-violent drug offenders is mandatory minimums (Miller 164). Mandatory minimums can be very harsh. For example, 28 grams of crack cocaine will get a person 5 years in prison whereas 500 grams of regular cocaine would be equivalent to 5 years (drugpolicy.org). Because of these punishments most of those in prison are non-violent people in a place that is supposed isolate violent, scary criminals from mainstream society (Miller 170). Imprisonment changes people’s lives. Prisoners lose “liberty,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Supertramp’s Excursion There comes a point where you cross between the line of reality and fantasy, and Chris McCandless crossed the line, unfortunately he did it for all the wrong reasons. McCandless had a very bright imagination which caused him to struggle to find the difference between reality and fantasy hard to seperate. He would often fantasize about how the trip would go.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter two of Michelle Anderson’s “The New Jim Crow,” Alexander explains how the system of mass incarceration works. Anderson argues that the War on Drugs has led to the increment of African Americans in state and federal prisons for non-serious drug violations (possession). Most of these men have no serious criminal histories and are rarely drug kings or high ranked drug dealers. Due to the government’s persistence in making the community safer by removing “criminals,” they have developed programs to crack down on drugs. Law enforcement agencies were using illegal tactics, which became legalized, to capture people.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of Drug Crazy

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The very mention of drugs summons demonic images: needles, babies addicted at birth, violence. No issue generates such a visceral reaction in people like the topic of drugs. In Mike Gray’s book “Drug Crazy: How We Got Into This Mess and How We Can Get Out,” his analysis of the drug war in America explores the mass hysteria surrounding addiction that was nourished with misinformation. Based on the history Gray has compiled, coupled with modern studies, the drug war appears to be a lost cause, now and into the foreseeable future. In 1909, Dr. Hamilton Wright was appointed as the third U.S delegate to the International Opium Commission at Shanghai and became “personally responsible for shaping the international narcotics laws as we know them today.”…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the hottest topics that has been widely discussed lately is the “drug war”. A regular columnist and professor of economics at Samford University, Art Carden argues in his article Forbes, “Let’s Be Blunt: It’s Time to End the Drug War” for the end of the drug prohibition. The purpose of the article is to persuade the readers that the war on drugs has been a costly failure, causing unintended negative economic consequences. Overall, Carden’s argument is convincing because he offers a strong, clear thesis with persuasive logical evidences as supports.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people would not think that a racial caste system exists in the United States, especially after Barack Obama was elected as a president. However, having a few successful African Americans doesn’t necessarily mean racism is abolished. During the last thirty years, United States’ incarceration rates have soared while other countries’ incarceration rates remained the same or decreased. Not only that, the incarcerated population in the United States is racially disproportionate; about 90% of the prisoners are African Americans or Hispanics in most of the states. Although the studies show that people of all colors use and sell illegal drugs at similar rates, African American men have been admitted to prison on drug charges at twenty to fifty…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Eugene Jarecki, "Rates of addiction remain unchanged, overdose deaths are at an all-time high, and drugs cost less than ever before” (Branson). In fact, we spend more money trying to incarcerate drug abusers than we do on trying to rehabilitate them. The American Public Health Association, states that, “While [over the years] drug war budgets have generally increased, effective treatment programs are chronically underresourced.” Furthermore, polling indicates that more and more people across the nation have come to the conclusion that the war on drugs has failed and agree that we need change, as shown in research done by the Global Commission on Drug Policy (Branson).…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    80 percent of the individuals sentenced under this statute are black, while two-thirds of the individuals who use crack-cocaine are white and Latino (Morris, www.civilrights.org). And according to an article in the Yale Law Journal, black people are arrested at higher rates than whites even though they “self-report drug use and drug dealing at a equivalent or lower rates” (Starr and Rehavi, 36). Moreover, the same study found even more convincing evidence: black men are “nearly twice as likely to be charged with an offense carrying a mandatory minimum sentence” (Starr and Rehavi, 28). These percentages being what they are, it is beyond dispute that racial biases influence how this law and other laws are applied.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did you know that the state of Virginia received just over 2000 weapons, consisting mostly of assault rifles? States like Tennessee have twice the amount and have roughly 900 vehicles, all from the military as well (LESO 1033 Program 2015). This may not seem like a lot; however, this information is part of a larger debate on whether the Federal government should continue militarizing American Law Enforcement by giving them this equipment. Many wonder how militarization started; however, before people understand that, they must understand what militarization really means. When people describe the militarization of police, they usually think that all of the officers have assault weapons, grenade launchers, and other very powerful equipment.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The War on Drugs “was conceived by politicians with a coded racist agenda and enforced through a biased strategy…which ensures that those ensnared in the police net will be disproportionately poor, male, and members of minority groups” (Atwell, M., 2012). Furthermore, the 1986 Anti-Drug Abuse Act changed the sentences for powder and crack cocaine to make a 1 to 100 distinction between the two, meaning that the possession of 5 gram of crack triggered a five-year prison sentence, whereas 50 grams of powder cocaine was needed to trigger the same five-year sentence (Garrison, A. H., 2011). Because the War on Drugs focused on drug offenses that were occurring within the inner cities, rather than on college campuses or in businesses, more African Americans were criminalized due to the fact that they were more highly represented within the inner cities. Furthermore, the disparity between the sentences of crack verses powder cocaine greatly contributed to the longer sentences of African Americans due to the fact that crack cocaine was a less expensive version of cocaine and was therefore more prominent within poorer communities which tended to be predominantly African American. Although the War on Drugs and the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 aimed to reduce the amount of…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    America’s prison system has been utilized to repress the rights and of African Americans through different policies enacted by presidents, or clauses within the Constitution. Black males are twelve times more likely to be incarcerated than white males for drug offenses despite rates of drug use being virtually the same between the two races (Racial Inequity and Drug Arrests). Different policies like mandatory minimums and “three strikes and you’re out” disproportionately affected black communities as well. These policies allowed and continue to allow the government to keep a large amount of black americans in a position of second class citizens. The incarceration system within the United States has been used as a tool to suppress Black Americans…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Power Of 420 Analysis

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States government has been campaigning on the prohibition of drugs for nearly a century. President Richard Nixon declared the “War on Drugs” in the 1970s. It was evident his administration wanted to shift the public perception of drugs by demonizing all drugs and campaigning on the dangers of drug use, which later lead to major anti-drug bills during the 19080s and 1990s. For years, our society has been taught that drugs have negative consequences that causes drug users to commit crimes. As a result of the stigmatization of drugs, we are faced with the challenges of changing the mindset that drug addicts are not criminals, but instead their addiction is a disease that requires medical attention, not criminalization.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are thousands of nonviolent drug offenders serving a lengthy mandatory prison sentencing within federal prisons. Years ago, during the “war on drugs”, this was President Richard Nixon quick fix to the dramatic growth on drug use and dealing. Decades later, maybe sooner, it has come to light that this mandatory sentencing mostly affected African American Men. For example, powder cocaine versus crack cocaine, were said to be two different drugs and crack cocaine dealers would serve a mandatory sentencing if in possession of such. Crack cocaine was an easy drug to acquire in urban neighbourhoods while powder cocaine was seen as a much prestige drug used among a more rich community.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mass Incarceration is a nationwide epidemic that affects predominately the African – American and Latino population. America has five percent of the world’s population but 25 percent of the world’s prison population. Various policies dated back centuries helped to create this problem of mass incarceration. In 1971, our prison population was approximately 500,000 but after President Nixon proclaimed drug abuse was “public enemy number one” the prison population slowly began to increase.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Criminal sentences for various drug offenses show the disproportionate effects of the War on Drugs and Crime on African Americans. Crack cocaine and powder cocaine have the exact same sentences for varying weights. 5 grams of crack cocaine is a mandatory five-year sentence while 500 (five hundred) grams of powder cocaine gets the exact same sentence. (Rosich) Crack cocaine distribution is more prevalent in the African American communities while powder cocaine is found in more affluent communities. The NAACP crime statistics also show that African Americans make up more than 80% of the people sentenced under the federal mandatory minimums for crack cocaine and they also serve longer sentences for their drug offenses than whites.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Huemer's Argument Analysis

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Huemer argues that a few different arguments that drug war advocates advance are false. One of the arguments Huemer targets is the Harm to Users argument. For this question, lay out the harm to users argument in premise-conclusion form and explain why drug war advocates who like this argument think that each premise is true. After doing this, identify which premise Huemer uses the Howard case to undermine (i.e. identify which premise the Howard case is supposed to show is false). Then, explain the Howard case (i.e. who Howard is, what he does, etc.) and why Huemer thinks the Howard case shows that the premise in the Harm to Users argument is false.…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics