Aristotle's Principle Of Happiness Analysis

Aristotle discusses the topic of happiness in Nicomachean Ethics books I and II. Here in these books Aristotle 's principle of happiness is discussed, it is an activity of the soul. By this he means happiness in of itself is a complex state of well being, things such as goods of the soul and external goods are part of it along with various parts. External goods are materialistic things which help with achieving happiness, but cannot give full happiness, while goods of the soul are the greatest of the great. Their soul works in accordance to their behavior or any form of goodness in their lives that drives them to achieve happiness. Happiness isn 't a state that one can fall in and out of, happiness is carried out to the fullest with the right actions for the right …show more content…
I do find problems with some parts of the principle, but I think they can be over come. In certain cases I believe people who find some sadness in their life at a point in their life can find ultimate happiness, which is where my conflict with the principle lies. I feel this principle offers a lot of insight on how to view the world within ourselves and deal with the emotions related to our actions, how to understand them wholesomely. Aristotle believes with habit and practice, virtue can manifest itself into ones life and I agree. I know he also believes some people are born with external goods such as beauty and birth predispose one to happiness. I believe that those things can help, but don 't necessarily need to be in everyones life to achieve happiness. If I lived with this everyday, it would take much practice and a lot of conversations with people I find to be happy, but I think it is possible. This theory is one that I find vital to each human being on this earth and could ease a lot of troubles with time. It will take much practice to find the correct virtue and morals, but not