Arguments Against Voting

Register to read the introduction… Others believe that without the right to vote, “… may actually contribute to recidivism by keeping ex-offenders and their families disengaged from the civic mainstream.” (Feser). This seems like a good point but the results of the study could have been misinterpreted. Voting doesn’t make someone responsible, although, the responsible person will be likelier to vote. This means, that, “a former inmate who already has what it takes to clean up his act, is not likely to relapse into a life of crime just because they can’t cast a ballot (Feser).” The argument that voting is one the basic rights are beside the point. The declaration of Independence states that unalienable rights include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It does not say life, liberty and the right …show more content…
“ The decision to restore the right to vote should not be made automatically. It should be made carefully, weighing the seriousness of the crime, how long ago it was committed, whether there is a pattern of crime, and any evidence that the felon has really turned over a new leaf. This idea seems to be the most satisfying conclusion for both sides and could work well to give those who deserve it their right to vote. Although, many people who are against it have made some good points, there is not enough evidence to hold up the argument that it is right to take away the right to vote from felons. Felons for the most part have displayed actions of bad judgment and some want to change for the better. Convicted felons have to live in America for the rest of their life so they need to have their rights restored once they are released from