Article 1:
Abrahamsson, E., Trobiornsson, A., & Hägglö, B. (2007), could not find “many studies of homogenous clinical sample on adolescent onset anorexia nervosa(NA).” In this study, a representative clinical sample of individuals with previous anorexia nervosa was selected. They were interviewed at eight and sixteen years after they had their initial onset of the disorder. Authors compared the perceived causes of those who had continued to suffer from this disorder and those who had recovered (Abrahamsson et al.,2007). The (nonprobability sampling study here does not clearly identify the sample size. It may have consisted of 68 or 69 participants with 15 years of median age for the first part of the study and 23 years old for the second …show more content…
J., & Abel, L. M., 2015). 161 university students (N = 161) were randomly assigned to one of four aetiological explanations of anorexia nervosa via a computer-generated randomisation procedure to read one of four aetiological vignettes. The four causes presented were biological/genetic(n = 37), socio-cultural(n = 37), environmental (n = 39), or multifactorial (n = 39) in order to highlight how blame-based (or volitional) stigma associated with the disorder may be reduced. The range of participants age was17 to 34 years old with a mean of 21.3. Ten of the participant (all females) were removed from the database with a self-reported history of anorexia nervosa. The data were analyzed using the SPSS with windows. The sample here is nonprobability quota sampling of participants who were recruited through an information questionnaire on a research board, after which contacted by email and randomly assigned to one of four groups. As far as ethical concerns all the participant were informed of the purpose of the study and had received the informed consent form to
Abrahamsson, E., Trobiornsson, A., & Hägglö, B. (2007), could not find “many studies of homogenous clinical sample on adolescent onset anorexia nervosa(NA).” In this study, a representative clinical sample of individuals with previous anorexia nervosa was selected. They were interviewed at eight and sixteen years after they had their initial onset of the disorder. Authors compared the perceived causes of those who had continued to suffer from this disorder and those who had recovered (Abrahamsson et al.,2007). The (nonprobability sampling study here does not clearly identify the sample size. It may have consisted of 68 or 69 participants with 15 years of median age for the first part of the study and 23 years old for the second …show more content…
J., & Abel, L. M., 2015). 161 university students (N = 161) were randomly assigned to one of four aetiological explanations of anorexia nervosa via a computer-generated randomisation procedure to read one of four aetiological vignettes. The four causes presented were biological/genetic(n = 37), socio-cultural(n = 37), environmental (n = 39), or multifactorial (n = 39) in order to highlight how blame-based (or volitional) stigma associated with the disorder may be reduced. The range of participants age was17 to 34 years old with a mean of 21.3. Ten of the participant (all females) were removed from the database with a self-reported history of anorexia nervosa. The data were analyzed using the SPSS with windows. The sample here is nonprobability quota sampling of participants who were recruited through an information questionnaire on a research board, after which contacted by email and randomly assigned to one of four groups. As far as ethical concerns all the participant were informed of the purpose of the study and had received the informed consent form to