Analysis Of Plato 's Dialogue : Meno And Phaedo Essay

824 Words Feb 11th, 2016 4 Pages
Analysis of Plato’s Dialogue: Meno and Phaedo
Introduction
Plato wrote almost thirty dialogue, and Socrates is the major character in most of them. Platonic dialogue is a genre involving other texts such as Xenophon’s hiero and Plato’s law, in which Socrates, a wise man leads the dialogues those against each dialogues is Socrates who attempt to find out more about the understanding of other person concerning moral issues
Meno
In this Plato’s dialogue, the Socrates is faced with some very persuasive arguments with Meno, his another accuser. This dialogue’s main theme consists of the vivid explanation of real virtue by the Socrates utilizing brilliant epistemology. At certain point when Meno affirms that virtue is knowledge which can be taught, the Socrates disagree with his believe affirming that there is no one who is qualified to teach it, and that it is a Gift from God which cannot be taught to any person. It is worth noting that the arguments which then subsequently follow between Socrates and the geometrical implies that is utilized by Socrates to explain the true meaning of virtue is sublime and outstanding.
In most cases, the Socrates speaks in a very conversational and plain manner. He provides explanation of his lack of experience with the law courts, and that he will rather speak in a direct and honest manner. The Socrates goes ahead to explain that his conduct is a result of prophecy by the oracle at Delphi that claimed that there was no wiser man than him. With…

Related Documents