Milton Friedman The Social Responsibility Of Business

Improved Essays
Friedman and Social Responsibility of Business
Introduction
Milton Friedman believed and argued that business people take care of the responsibilities that affect them in their day to day life. However, they don't care the impact their businesses have on the society so long as their market is growing and increasing their profits. The main reason why he argued this is because believing in a reduced impact that the government has and a free-market. He found that government solutions to problems are no better because its solutions are even worse than the problem itself. As a result of his belief, he believed that the government should keep off the businesses activities because of its greed and the quest of people to have access to power. Additionally,
…show more content…
It can only be possible if it hand reduces the cost of the expenses such as minimizing the potentially harmful effects the business might have to the social lives such as pollution (Friedman, 2007). His statement that "the social responsibility of a business is to increase its profits" sounds cruel. But from my perspective, this might be true. Businesses stakeholders do anything they can to ensure that their businesses become large and more prominent every day. They don't care what their companies do or how they affect others. Some of them don't care about the safety of the workers that help them make the profits. Others care less about where they dump their waste products. They dispose of them in rivers, air pollution and a lot of noise pollution, all these because they want to reduce the cost of production and increase the output. In the third world countries, some business owners employ young kids because they will pay them less amount compared to what could have been paid to the right person for the job (Carroll & Shabana, 2010). The act deprives young children the right to access education, and they are physically abused. All the laws make the society uncivil and potentially unpleasant to live. Friedman was having no problem with businesses making profits so long as they maintain a civilized society. I do not doubt that what he was …show more content…
Their social purpose is to make profits, grow bigger and make much money as possible for its stakeholders. Individuals who run these corporations do not care about what impact their business have or how they affect the social life of other people. From my point of view, this is the main reason why he claims that the business owners care about the social responsibilities of their social life, but they don't take care of the same social responsibilities when it comes to running their businesses. The way he was proposing was right. Companies and firms should be allowed to make as much profit as they can, but in return, legislations that will demand the benefits created by the businesses to be used to take care of the externalities from their companies should be set. The enforcement of these legislations would make the business owners responsible for the social life even in their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In his article, The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, Milton Friedman argues that the only duty of a company towards society, referred to as a social responsibility, is to work towards the best interest of its owners; usually to maximize profits within the confines of the law . As a company is not an intelligent being, Friedman uses corporate executives as the primary subject of most of his arguments. As an employee of a firm’s owners, an executive is under legal obligation to serve them as a custodian of their private property and serve this role within the rules of the free market, engaging in legal, open and free competition. If they feel that they have some other higher responsibility as an individual than they…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A company’s self interest is always prioritized. CSR is only used as a way to make consumers believe that they are helping society. The final accomplishment businesses wish to complete is a big bottom line. Additionally, companies don’t really help out communities, they only pretend to. By using intelligent marketing strategies and launching very inefficient campaigns, consumers can be easily fooled and fail to analyze a company’s true motives.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    From the business point of view it is important to understand that outsourcing is part of globalization, and it benefits the company’s efficiency and it saves money in labor. Many Americans believe that outsourcings hurt Americans economy and are against the idea of taking Americans jobs to other countries. Bryson, a global economist for Wells Fargo said: “When jobs move from a factory in the South to one in Guatemala or China, it certainly has a negative impact on that community in the short run…But in the long run it makes things more efficient." (Hargreaves, 2012) And in fact it might make things more efficient for the company because it is relatively easier to establish a business in China than in the United States, however it is inedible to ignore the impact in American workers. “Over the past decade data from the United States Department of Commerce show that U.S biggest companies that employ a fifth of American workers reduced their work forces by approximately 3 million jobs while increasing employment overseas.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Up until the mid to late 20th century, businesses were only recognised for doing one thing which was to increase their profit return to their investors within legal boundaries. However, as a result of an era of social activists, Carroll (1991) acknowledges Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a further extension of a business’s arm to also act within ethical and philanthropic avenues that society would expect of businesses. Like most controversial discussions there is always two opposing views which I will introduce as those like Milton Friedman who opposed CSR as the only obligation a business had was to “make as much money as possible while conforming to the basic rules of society” and to not simply do this would be to disadvantage the…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A business that acts on social responsibility rather than shareholder interest is undermining the system of a free society. It simply is not proper or fair for a business executive to act as the judicial, legislative, and executive function all at once. The only responsibility of a business is to use its resources to engage in activities that increase profits, both for the business and its shareholders. To most, corporate social responsibility seems appealing on the surface, but the road to corporate fraud and wrongdoings can be paved with good…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think that he just concentrated on earning money and a high profitability business without concern about other people. He must learn and understand more about morality, ethical corporate, and its social responsibility. He seemed to be be an immature adult because he did not know what he did wrong and he blamed for others. I do not think a government authority was able to revoke a business license just because…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Try paying fair wages and tax´´, by Peter Wilby, 2010. The text is about the bad side of the rich people and what cons there is about donating to these organizations. They donate to get around the tax, and when they donate they market their product and get even more money. They donate to show a good example of themselves, but they will not help their workers, and give them better work environment. They are trying to avoid taxes and even though they donate their money, they will still be rich.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Calkins and Jonathan Wight, first key criticisms toward Milton Friedman was about the description of the business manager role as to maximize profits for shareholders which is the CEO moral obligation. Calkins and Wight express their opposition to Friedman idea of narrowing the whole managerial concept on to maximizing profits because, profits play a big role in the market system in references to consumer’s preferences which is different from Milton Friedman concept. On Friedman point of view: There is a moral foundation required for a stable society and “Managers are to make as much money as possible for their owners and avoid other activities that reduce shareholder profits”. As it is emphasizes by M. Friedman:…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milton Friedman was a man who believed businesses had one sole purpose, make money. that socially responsibility was a reason for free trade necessity and order. In order to freely trade we need a reason too and that would be where outsourcing comes into play. Friedman was a strongly felt man about the needs of society and the needs of the business. While also acknowledging this need, he is also in favor of the benefits of society at large without the benefits to shareholders.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study: The Body Shop

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While the consultants only want profit for the business and this very difference in opinion could create problems in the business. Anita’s answers show that difference of opinion was one of the many reasons why that management consultant didn’t…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays