Analysis Of Frederick Douglas's Speech At The Anti-Slavery

Improved Essays
Frederick Douglas was an advocate of total abolition and women’s rights. In his Speech at the Anti-Slavery Association 1848, he provides a pictorial description of America in order to reveal the atrocities committed by slaveholders. Douglas does not care about who an individual is associated with (e.g. church or state) because if one not helping to find a solution to end slavery, and are indifferent, then one is merely adding to the problem of slavery. He does not support the union, constitution, or church as it is (254) because it furthers advocation of slaveholders and further deprives slaves. Skin color is merely an external factor, and was not intended to be seen as a distinction between peoples. He argues that God created all beings and …show more content…
He discusses that what an individual should do, is put themselves in the shoes of the slaves and advocate for their just treatment, which is what abolitionists do. However, abolitionists are broken up into multiple groups: the Republican Party, the Garrison, and Radical abolitionists. The Republican party sought for confinement of slavery within slave states, otherwise known as constitutional limits (258). However, Douglas does not agree with this because it still provides slave owners with the constitutional right to hold slave and do injustices onto them. Even though they hate slavery, they do not advocate total abolishment is necessary, believing slavery will die out on its own. The Garrison abolitionists strongly disliked the constitution because of its pro-slavery framing advocating “no union with slaveholders”(258). For this reason, the Garrison’s refused to vote for government officials. However, Douglas believes this is contradictory to abolitionists nature of advocating for those who do not have a voice and leaves slaves to fend for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln sought to unite the nation once more, upholding the nation and reestablishing the power over the South. Even in the slave letter did he point out that neither side really pursued to free them. The South wanted to keep them as slaves and the North wanted the slaves only for their army. Neither side sought for their independence from enslavement, only the slaves themselves fought for their own liberty and freedom. Even at the end of the war the South did not see the slaves as a free group of people, they resented the Union, the damage they inflicted on their homes and land and they abhorred the new working structure the government created.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Union was anti-slavery so the members in the Union disagreed with the Fugitive Slave Law which went against the Union’s objective, to abolish slavery. To summarize, slavery added anxiety for slaves and white citizens, especially when the Fugitive Slave Act was enacted and it helped destroy the…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Thesis

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Furthermore, Senator Charles Tillinghast James argued in his speech that “the slavery of the South, if an unpardonable sin, is not to be answered and atoned by the people of the North. They have nothing to do with it” (“Senator Charles Tillinghast James, Speech on the Fugitive Slave Act, August 26, 1852”). The northerners felt as if they were carrying the burden of the rural South’s slave-centric society as many northerners did not rely on the slave system and thought that this punishment was unjust thus establishing…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The parts of the south that remained pro-union resisted and resist they should. They knew it was morally wrong to expand slavery and keep slaves. They also knew it was illegal and an act of treason to secede from the union. The southern states that did secede were traders to the United…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephens also insinuated that the leaders of the union were to be regarded as hypocrites. According to him, the desire of the south to secede should not be met with resistance from the north. If the north really believed in their characterization of the institution of slavery as evil, then they should have absolutely no problem letting go of those in support of slavery. However, he believed the north was content with reaping some of the benefits of slavery while denouncing it in the same breath. He believed if the United States government, the northern states in particular, genuinely believed in the principles they proclaimed, they would have no problem doing away with the states that did not wish to do away with slavery.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He had no rights, because blacks were regarded as beings of an inferior order. Simply put, they were property. It also ruled that his home state determined his status, not his travels. Third, it stated that Congress’s power did not include the right to prohibit slavery. This decision while igniting the Republican Party only helped to strengthen their claim that the slaveholding south presented a threat against northern liberties of “free soil, free labor, and free men.” Northerners were taken back by the Court’s decision and Southerners were outraged that Northerners considered a Supreme Court ruling “just an opinion.” This was a blow to the national unity pushing the nation into war.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The northern states contrasting with the south refused to take any of these benefits of slavery based off of the people 's ethical beliefs. Even though the North was generally considered anti-slavery, their ethical beliefs refused them to allow slavery into their society. With a rewrite of the Articles of Confederation definitely in order, which lead to the rights of all slaves during that time to be restricted and held down through unfair clauses in the Constitution. Before the events leading up to the Constitution, representatives from all the current…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The writers of the American Mercury, a newspaper in America, also believed that slavery should end. The American people have stated that all men are created equal, but they still have slavery. The ideas in the Declaration of Independence of everyone being equal are being ignored when it comes to blacks and slavery is allowed to flourish. The systems that support the enslavement of some people, “will no more support the burden of humanity” than a “section of an arch will support a column.” The government system in America will fall if slavery will be allowed to continue. America is punishing innocent people with “endless, hopeless slavery.” They have done nothing to deserve this treatment, but America is forcing them to work their entire life for someone else and to endure countless painful experiences when they don’t perform their job as well their masters wish them to.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln even refused to sign the Wade- Davis Bill, which mandated strict requirement for the south before they could make their new government. Andrew Johnson, who was the president after Lincoln’s death, tried to follow Lincoln’s footstep. However, the republican prevented Johnson from doing that.Since those republicans were angered by the destruction that the Civil War caused, the Republicans treated the southern government as criminals. In addition, Johnson was racist and it caused a drift between him and the republicans. Like Lincoln, Johnson was willing to forgive the south, if they promise to support the Union and abolish slavery.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The leaders of the south wanted to keep slavery and they went to war over it. Also, Livingston may have reversed “myth” to far by saying that the South was less egregious towards Blacks than the North. With men like Confederate Vice President Alexander H. Stephens who said, “slavery—subordination to the superior race—is his natural and moral condition” (72) gives foundation for the great depravity in the slaveholder’s mind. What seems to be clear, is that slavery and prejudice was not a North or South issue; rather it is what it has always been—a humanity issue. Livingston is correct.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays