Goldberg'sfive Factor Model Essay

Great Essays
An Exploration on Lewis Goldberg’sFive Factor Model in Association with Obedience

As often beyond what is of a simple explanation, behavior is determined through complex intertwinements of internal and external factors as well as individual differences (Paulhus, Delroy. “Trait Psychology.” CIRS building at the University of British Columbia. Vancouver. 25 January 2016. Lecture.). In the case of obedience to authority, behavior is, without exception, dependent on several intervening factors (Paulhus, Delroy. “Obedience.” CIRS building at the University of British Columbia. Vancouver. 24 February 2016. Lecture.) In the interest of such topic, my scope of my research lies on individual personality in relation to overt behaviors that are of obedient
…show more content…
An individual who is neurotic show a tendency to be “anxious, insecure, guilt-prone and self-conscious” (Lindsay et al, 476). Prior to one version of Milgram’s experiment, which involves a subject teacher delivering noise shocks to a confederate learner, Zeigler-Hill et al report that subjects are surveyed by means of the completion of a neuroticism personality inventory test, which “consists of eight items that are rated on scales ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)” (Zeigler-Hill et al, 165). Agreeing withtheir prediction, Zeigler-Hill et al find that subjects who “required more prods to continue [have indeed] also reported experiencing higher levels of negative [emotion] during the session” (168). In other words, the result reveals that “individuals who have reported more negative emotions during the session were more [unwilling to obey the experimenter’s instructions]” (Ibid). Zeigler-Hill et al have also identified that these negative emotions experienced by the subjects are only “associated with the reluctance to obey for individuals with low levels of neuroticism” (Ibid). A potential explanation here may be that, based on Lindsay et al’s description of neuroticism, people who have low levels of neuroticism may experience less anxiousness for not abiding by authority’s decisions or commands – especially for those subject teachers who …show more content…
From one perspective, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness, in terms of personality dimensions, are of cardinal importance in explaining the higher levels of obedience in inflicting pain on others. However, another perspective highlights Neuroticism for the reason being. As forobserving results of contrasting nature, more research is required to amass supplementary knowledge. Specifically, it is seen that the sample size of Toepfer et al 's study is quite limited, which may or may not be generalizable to an entire population. Further studies should build on by addressing children and adults in cohort-based longitudinal studies to be able to better observe understand, for example, developmental changes that affect obedience should they exist.
In addition, the situation in which individuals score highly on Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and Neuroticism is not at all of investigation in relation to obedience. Further research, thus, should also be targeted atunderstanding how obedience is likely to be affected under the influence of multi-dimensional personalities should it be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The goal of this paper is to review and analyze the article written by Stanley Milgram in 1963. This experiment was considered to be one of the most acknowledged research in the history of social psychology that revealed the unpredicted side of human nature. The author described the tendencies of obedience as inevitable part of our lives, particularly since we live in the complex systems of society where human interaction is unavoidable. He illustrated that this specific tendencies of human behavior was extremely relevant at this specific time in history, during which millions of innocent lives had systematically been lost through wars and fascist movements. It is clearly evident that the author became deeply curious about the nature of “obedience”…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the articles “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You” and “Review of Stanly Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience,” authors Theodore Dalrymple and Diana Baumrind describe the aspects of the Stanley Milgram experiment, while they both partake different topics to discuss. Dalrymple, a British physician, claims that there is a difference between blind obedience and blind disobedience, and there should be a healthy balance between the two (Dalrymple 119). However, Baumrind believes that the subjects should have been treated in a more enhanced way; therefore, claiming that the experiment unsuitably took advantage of the inherent trust and obedience given by the subject when volunteering to participate (Baumrind 89). These two articles are relevant to…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cool Hand Luke is a 1967 film that portrays the experiences of a prisoner who refuses to adhere to the orders given to him in jail. This inmate Luke’s rebellious behaviour is in opposition with the general sense of conformity illustrated by the other prisoners. An individual can choose to conform and be obedient to authority, or to be non-compliant which can result in severe punishment. This paper will examine how conformity and obedience are strictly enforced and how non-conformity is punished in Cool Hand Luke through the social psychological themes of obedience to authority, conformity, and non-conformity. Obedience to authority is a theme that is frequently expressed through the inmates in the film.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram proposed that people operate on two levels. First, they operate as autonomous individuals, where they act according to their own values and beliefs. Second, they act on an agentic level where they see themselves as agents, acting on behalf of somebody else and not responsible for their own actions. He asserted that it is possible to move from an autonomous state into an agentic state; this is referred to as an agentic shift (Milgram, 1963). A consequence of this shift is that an individual no longer feels responsible for their actions.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Obedience to authority is a huge impact on a person’s morality. To further extend this idea the question on why do people with strong values, principles, ethics challenge and go against their morals when faced with an authority figure needs to be asked.. Many ideas are produced when asked this question; the focus will be on the internal forces that push someone to do something they normally would not do. Fear, conformality, and other internal experiences such as responsibility among others fuel the obedience to authority and change the way a person behaves. Michael Shermer and Saul Mcleod both provide extensive information on the stimulus of the obedience.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Dilemma of Obedience” from his book Obedience to Authority, Stanley Milgram claims that people choose to become obedient to authority even if their actions are not constant with their own moral or significance. He begins by describing the importance of obedience and how it is so powerful that it can overthrow a person’s demeanor and their values on life. In order to understand the effects of authority on others, such as the ones on the Jews in Nazi Germany, Milgram constructs an experiment in order to examine how much pain a regular person would inflict on another person because they were authorized to do so. This will create some sort of conflict between the authority and the subject’s upstanding imperatives against hurting others.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In a similar fashion, the experimenter in the Milgram experiment makes this idea concrete. Milgram states, “ [t]he essence of obedience is that a person comes to view himself as the instrument for carrying out another person’s wishes, and he therefore no longer regards himself as responsible for his actions” (87). By being obedient, a person can be taken advantage of by authority and in turn abandon their moral…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram Experiment In the 1960s, Stanley Milgram (1993-1984) began an experiment that would test to see how obedient people would be no matter the circumstances. One experiment Milgram performed consisted of volunteers shocking someone they did not know if he or she did not answer a question correctly. As the questions are answered incorrectly, the voltage would rise. Unknown to the volunteer, the subject that is being shocked is an actor that is not being electrocuted, and the volunteer was the subject of the experiment. As the experiment continued, the volunteers began to become stressed (Taylor, Peplau, & Sears, 2005, p. 228).…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, we will develop a definition of “group mind” in the light of articles such as “opinions and social pressure” by Solomon E. Asch, and “the follower problem” by David brooks. The definition of the group mind that we will develop from these articles will be used to analyze the story “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson. In this article, we will analyze and apply the definition of group mind developed and use it to analyze the story of Shirley Jackson, and use examples from the texts to further Introduction: According to Solomon E. Asch, group mind or thinking of a group of people have a profound effect on the thought procedure of an individual. Solomon says “That social influences shape every person’s practices, judgments and T,…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone has experienced classical conditioning and may not even know it. A common example is food: you ate something that made you sick and now you never eat it; you’re conditioned against the food because you had a bad reaction. In the most simple terms, classical conditioning or Pavlovian conditioning is learning a new behavior with different stimuli that create a reaction that can be repeated numerously through a recurring experiment. This kind of conditioning is seen in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, and goes along with the theme, psychological conditioning is potentially dangerous, which I agree with.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Comparative Analysis of Ross and Nisbett’s “The Power of Situations” and Fromm’s “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem” Introduction Ross and Nisbett disagree with Fromm about the causes for obedience or disobedience to authority. It states in the introduction to “The Power of Situations”: “Erich Fromm conceives of obedience and disobedience as products of one’s character or of one’s moral choices” (627). This is suggesting that Fromm believes a person will obey or disobey based on their personality traits. He states: “All martyrs of religious faiths, of freedom, and of science have had to disobey those who wanted to muzzle them in order to obey their own consciences, the laws of humanity, and of reason” (623). People…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People all over the world tend to toss their morals aside in order to conform to the influences of society or a higher superior. However, people below the chain of authority, especially the youth, struggle the most in attempt to triumph over these types of situations. Although conformity often helps society function correctly, there becomes a problem when a person’s identity becomes too infatuated within a higher authority that they disregard their own personal morals. So why in a society principled in independence and freewill do people eagerly toss morals aside in order to conform to a superior? It seems as if even though the face of morality does not disappear, individuals still willingly set their beliefs aside in order to please an authority figure.…

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    “If a man can only obey and not disobey, he is a slave; if he can only disobey and not obey, he is a rebel” (Fromm 125). Obedience is a trait that parents instill in children to keep them safe and out of trouble. Throughout life, people realize obedience is not always the answer; however, ruling out obeying as a whole is counterproductive. In “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem”, Erich Fromm claims people fear authority, yet wish to climb the ladder to reach maximum power. In contrast, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo depicts individuals who are in charge of others, however, hate the ease in which individuals shove their morals aside.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays