A True War Story Analysis

Improved Essays
A true war story can be defined in many ways. It could be defined as a story that describes real events that happened to soldiers, or a story that . In the book The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien, a true war story has many definitions, but they all have one thing in common, “A true war story is never moral” (O’Brien, 68). In order to understand what makes a true war story, one must first understand what is war and stories, how can these things be both true and untrue, and how does the author and reader play a part in the story.
In order to understand how to tell a true war story, we need to understand what a war story is and how it relates stories to war. War can be described in many ways and has different aspects. There are also
…show more content…
A true war story tells the reader about an experience. The story does not show or tell the reader, but teaches the reader truths about what it is like to live in a war. O’Brien describes the term “A true war story” in many ways. One way he describes it, is that, “A true war story is never about war” (O’Brien, 85) What this means is that a true war story is the opinion and perspective of the narrator. The narrator has had an adventure and an story. A true war story isn’t about what happened and the facts, it is about the experience and adventure that comes with a …show more content…
After telling a war story, O’Brien ends the story by saying, “That’s a true story that never happened”(O’Brien, 84) This causes confusion from the reader. How can a true war story be true if it never happened? A true war story is true in how it is written, if the story holds a truth. If the author can make the reader believe that the story is true, then the story can become true, even if it never happened. How the reader feels about the war story is more important than the story itself. The details of the story do not matter because, “Absolute occurrence is irrelevant” (O’Brien, 83) The story only has to occur in the minds of the author and the reader to be true. The characters do not have to exist because outside of the mind nobody can go back in time to check the facts of the author. Nobody can question the experience of the author unless they are the author. In war a person loses their sense of reality and causes them to question what is true. This causes them to later forget what was true and what wasn’t, “In a true war story nothing is ever absolutely true” (O’Brien, 82) In war, a person loses their sense of reality and memory of what is true. People lose their understanding of truth because of the impact that war has. This causes war stories to become untrue. While details and thoughts may be true, the memory of war is often never true and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “How to Tell a True War Story” begins with “This is true” (64). It ends with “None of this happened. None of it” (81). The story within this chapter isn’t about Curt Lemon’s death or the patrol or the baby buffalo, it’s about how to tell a story. O’Brien says that to tell a true war story, it must produce a reaction, even if the stories themselves may have never happened.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a nation, the United States, can learn from what happened in Vietnam. A Rumor of War is not a book created from Philip Caputo’s imagination. “This book is not a work of the imagination. The events related are true, the characters real, though I have used fictitious names in some places. I have tried to describe accurately what the dominant event in the life of my generation, the Vietnam War, was like for men who fought in it.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are multiple statements that Kien makes and characteristics about him while he is writing that make readers call into question whether or not his stories are factual. For instance, Kien describes that the war stories that he remembers and tells are “focused and refocused until past scenes and the present become a raging reality” (Ninh 68), and that war drives him “down to into the depths of his imagination...there his writing could take substance” (Ninh 173). Essentially, Kien is saying that in order for his stories about the war to become a reality, he needs to combine the present moment with past events from war. Additionally, the only way Kien’s stories can become real is for him to dive into the depths of his imagination to create them. These statements lead readers to think that “the only certain thing during the Vietnam War was that nothing was certain” because Kien’s stories are not entirely authentic; they contain details from when Kien is actually in the Vietnam War, details from when he is not, and details from his imagination.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Campbell does not want to answer her question because he has no ties to any nation, he believes that what he did during the war was what allowed him to survive. Campbell’s job as a Nazi is to broadcast propaganda. Propaganda is information of a bias or misleading nature used for promoting or publicizing a particular political cause or point of view. Even though the broadcasts are Campbell’s voice, they are not his ideas. He is following the orders of the Germans and Americans.…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    To Tell or Not to Tell a War Story Phil Klay and Tim O’Brien are two very distinct war authors. Klay was a marine during the Iraq war, and O’Brien was an infantryman in the Vietnam War. Although the wars they were in are vastly different, they each have a story that focuses on the act of telling war stories. O’Brien’s story is “How to Tell a True War Story” from The Things They Carried, and Klay’s story is “War Stories” from Redeployment. However, the significance of telling war stories for each heavily contrasts each other.…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout this passage there is a sense of fact and fiction, which is something the rest of the book takes on as well. “And sometimes remember it will lead to a story, which makes it forever. That's what stories are for. Stories are for joining the past to the future.” (34) O’Brien needs war stories for him to remember his past. There is an idea of war stories needing to be true but as O’ Brien states a war story is meant to make people belive, “It comes down to gut instinct.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A crucial underlying message to understand is that even though Rat Kiley’s story may not be based on true facts per se, it’s message is true, which serves the story’s purpose. Tim O’Brien, the narrator explains that he and other soldiers listening were often skeptical of the legitimacy of Rat’s stories. However, Rat didn’t seem to care whether the soldiers thought the facts of the story were true or not, he wanted them to obtain the understanding of the war that he had obtained. “‘You don’t believe it?’ he’d say. ‘Fine with me.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The phrase “a person cannot change,” based solely off of this novel, is contradicted by the character of Arthur Dimmesdale. his genuine traits were atrocious, but with heavy thought with deep understanding of the type of person he should be, he proved the phrase, to be wrong. Being presented with conflicts is what gives structure to an individual. Without having to handle any, they would not have any character, much to say any knowledge. Despite what people will say or what they are willing to do, no one should have to live with the burden of hiding their secret because they feel like they are saving themselves from deep agony and torture.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People don’t think of heroes as being psychologically damaged, so his character shows that war doesn’t breed heroes it creates a catastrophe. People can’t begin to understand a situation unless they emerge themselves in those circumstances and even then a subject like war will always be hazy. Bowker’s resentment shows when he talks about soldiers getting their “back clapped by a bunch of patriotic idiots who don’t know jack about what it feels like to kill people… or watch your buddy go down underneath the mud”(150). Bowker doesn’t feel pride for the actions taken during the war and would much rather have his friend Kiowa than some pointless medal. It is impossible to begin to understand what soldiers went through, making them not the ideal heroes.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In some of the chapters, O’Brien even writes about events that never actually happened. According to Tim O’Brien’s criteria, “The Sweetheart of the Song Tra Bong” is a true war story because it is hard to believe, it does not suggest proper human behavior, and it is not uplifting. Since “The Sweetheart of the Song Tra Bong”…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays