Within decades the Soviet slowly started to fall, with Regan we saw the massive military buildup, basically outspend your enemy. Focusing mostly on the allocation of resources and economic managing sections of the fall. Soviet Union agriculture was not entirely horrible, on theory it made sense. A whole collective, farm that unifies smaller plots of land, to one has a whole. This allows the use of a tractor to be used effectively, while in the contrary to the US farmer that used the capital requirements to farm, and was able to secure funds. The issue came when they had to implement their model, it showed that the management were incapable to handle it, due to the lack of experience and knowledge. The simple were unable to predict the form
…show more content…
Plague by the previous issue, of too many countries and multiple nationalism no longer exited, they were either west or Soviet Union territory, it did not matter what culture or ethnicity they were, or country. Just two sides, west or east. This was new, for most of Europe’s history it had always been a composition of many countries coming together to from one alliance to be another, but a new giant came, that was not even from Europe itself but Russian. The division itself wouldn’t’ve happen if, the allies had not allowed Russia to gain so much ground, they failed to predict the spoils of war, they failed to see that Soviet Union will be the victors of the war too. In the most opinions it makes sense to attack Russia, for the giant proved to be more trouble than Nazi Germany, the Nazi regime was located to Europe and only to Europe had the allies comes together and offer a better solution to the lost Germans they could’ve prevented the cold war. Communism is good in the writing but once it’s been placed into practice it falls into a form of fascism, this leads to chaos and deliberate deaths, to destroy any opposing parties or ideas, communist is supposed to be a collection of ideas and minds placed to work towards a common goal, which Stalin and Nikita failed to do they protected themselves rather than the …show more content…
More and more republics left the Soviet Union, the leaders themselves called it a civilized union in which it allowed a relatively peaceful separation and no military force was used. Once the formidable Soviet Union was dissolved the new Russian took over, reducing drastically the military and restructuring itself left millions without jobs, leading to a new depression, worse than the US or Europe had experience, for it lead to a recession that will take years to recover. But the real cost was the thousands of soldiers that died, the millions of people killed in the proxy wars, and the damage done to the environment. The cold war ended in 1991 but it left an ever lasting impact in the world, the ethnic tensions, and cultural differences were forever branded in to place, the division in south Asia and the middle east has led to much conflict today, the inability for the east of Europe to reintegrate itself into the economy has left many wonder if it can even do anything significant. With Greece, falling to reinvigorate itself in reforms and the uprising of neo Nazism shows similar scenarios to the
Plague by the previous issue, of too many countries and multiple nationalism no longer exited, they were either west or Soviet Union territory, it did not matter what culture or ethnicity they were, or country. Just two sides, west or east. This was new, for most of Europe’s history it had always been a composition of many countries coming together to from one alliance to be another, but a new giant came, that was not even from Europe itself but Russian. The division itself wouldn’t’ve happen if, the allies had not allowed Russia to gain so much ground, they failed to predict the spoils of war, they failed to see that Soviet Union will be the victors of the war too. In the most opinions it makes sense to attack Russia, for the giant proved to be more trouble than Nazi Germany, the Nazi regime was located to Europe and only to Europe had the allies comes together and offer a better solution to the lost Germans they could’ve prevented the cold war. Communism is good in the writing but once it’s been placed into practice it falls into a form of fascism, this leads to chaos and deliberate deaths, to destroy any opposing parties or ideas, communist is supposed to be a collection of ideas and minds placed to work towards a common goal, which Stalin and Nikita failed to do they protected themselves rather than the …show more content…
More and more republics left the Soviet Union, the leaders themselves called it a civilized union in which it allowed a relatively peaceful separation and no military force was used. Once the formidable Soviet Union was dissolved the new Russian took over, reducing drastically the military and restructuring itself left millions without jobs, leading to a new depression, worse than the US or Europe had experience, for it lead to a recession that will take years to recover. But the real cost was the thousands of soldiers that died, the millions of people killed in the proxy wars, and the damage done to the environment. The cold war ended in 1991 but it left an ever lasting impact in the world, the ethnic tensions, and cultural differences were forever branded in to place, the division in south Asia and the middle east has led to much conflict today, the inability for the east of Europe to reintegrate itself into the economy has left many wonder if it can even do anything significant. With Greece, falling to reinvigorate itself in reforms and the uprising of neo Nazism shows similar scenarios to the