Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
15 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
1. Two ways of dealing with the issue of informed consent. |
Obtain Presumptive Consent and Retrospective Consent. |
Obtaining informed consent. |
|
1. What's Presumptive Consent? |
Asking group of people similar to retrospective participants, if they consent, it's presumed that the actual participants would. |
Who is asked to consent? |
|
1. What's Retrospective Consent? |
Obtaining consent as soon as the research is done, when the aims have been revealed.
|
Should be obtained as soon as possible! |
|
1. Why is obtaining informed consent a good thing? |
Helps reduce demand characteristics. |
Participants still won't know the aims of the study. |
|
2. What does debriefing deal with? |
Deception and right to withdraw |
Can deal with other ethical issues too, but what are the two main ones? |
|
2. When does debriefing happen and what happens during it? |
Once the research has finished; true aims are told, participants asked if they want to discuss any concerns and opportunity to withdraw data. |
Aims, Discussion, Withdrawal of data |
|
2. What four criteria must a debrief meet? |
Inform the pp's of aims and purpose Make sure no harm has been encountered Opportunity to withdraw data No negative consequences |
Ways of dealing with all the ethical issues |
|
3. What is an ethical committee? |
A committee which every institution where psychological research takes place has |
It doesn't allow for any unethical studies to take place |
|
3. What does an ethical committee do which leads to suggestions on how to deal with issues? |
Weighs the benefits of the research against the cost of the participants. |
Cost-benefit analysis between what? |
|
4. Who are ethical guidelines produced by? |
Professional bodies such as the British Psychological Society or the American Psychological Association. |
BPS/APA |
|
4. What do these guidelines do? |
Alert psychologists of what behaviour is acceptable and unacceptable, also tells them how to deal with dilemmas |
In relation to behaviour and dealing with things |
|
4. What kind of approach does the BPS and APA use and what's wrong with it? |
The rules and sanction approach, it is general |
The approach is impossible to cover every conceivable situation a psychologist may encounter |
|
4. Why is the Canadian Psychological Association better? |
They present a series of hypothetical dilemmas and invite psychologists to discuss them. |
This encourages discussion and absolves individual researchers of any responsibility |
|
5. What does the BPS do if a psychologist behaves unethically? |
They review the case and ban them from practising. |
Affects livelihood and removes their license. |
|
5. What's wrong with punishing psychologists? |
It isn't a legal way of dealing with things, so it isn't quite effective. |
Effectiveness. |