• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/14

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

14 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Quasi-independent experimental variables

Characteristics that can't be randomly assigned



Gender, age, ethnicity

True experimental variables

you can control these


you can randomly assign people to groups



Drug treatment A or B

True experimental designs:

Also known as randomised designs researchers can randomly assign participants to different experimental condition



Quasi experimental design

Similar to experimental designs but research is unable to randomly assign participants to groups

Confounding variables

if the groups to be compared differ in ways other than which the researcher has manipulated



Independent variable

Condition or event that you are controlling

Dependent variable

Variable that you are measuring

Randomisation

Ensures that each participant is equally likely to be assigned to a given condition

3 reasons for randomising

-Prevents experimenters (un)intentialy biasing their results


-Distributes the occurrence of potential moderating/confounding variables equally among experimental conditions


-Enables the use of powerful statistical tests that can help determine causal relationships between variables

Two ways of comparing groups/conditions

Independent groups (between-subjects)


Repeated measures (within-subjects)


Problem with independent group designs

Confounding factors between the two groups


- can fix this by ensuring the groups are matched as closely as possible on potential confounding variables


Repeated measures design: potential problems

Order effects


Once participants have been exposed to one level of the IV theres no way to return them to their original state:


Practice effects, fatigue effects

Counterbalancing: how to get around order effects

Randomly assign participants into group A or group B, and have them take part in the experiment in different orders



Order effects not eliminated but should be common to both conditions

Internal validity

How correct is it to claim that treatment X causes outcome O?



Has the study managed to prevent confounding variables