• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/19

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

19 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

First Impressions

can be robust & hard to change & somewhat accurate

Thin Slices

brief exposure of information about another person, we can make quite accurate influences & if you just see a person`s face you're better than chance to guess their political orientation or sexual orientation

Self-fulfilling Prophecies

process by which someone`s expectations about a person or group leads to the fulfillment of those expectations, connects with experimenter bias & if person has expectation based on stereotype then you'll treat them different & confirm expectation

Stereotypes

beliefs towards groups

Prejudice

feelings towards groups

Discrimination

behavior towards groups

Implicit Associations

connections in memory between concepts, automatic & prejudice

Implicit Associations Test (IAT)

measures how quickly you respond & coke, pepsi & good, bad

Confirmation Bias

look for things that confirm our beliefs & remember them first

Subtyping

making an expectation, say "oh their just different" & allows people to keep their stereotype

Stereotype Threat

experience where people are scared to confirm a stereotype of your group which is disruptive to performance & result in confirming the stereotype

Sheriff's Study Using The Autokinetic Effect

in dark room, stare at still light & people will see it moving even though its not, tell participants it's moving, ask them how much its moving, alone: have a personal norm & group: move toward an agreement/group average

Asch's Study With Line Lengths

have an obvious right answer but wanted to see if he could get people to give wrong answer if others did, one real participant rest confederates (stand in`s), manipulated: how many people in room, if all, most out some gave wrong answer, 25% never conformed, with a partner: only 5% conformed & people conformed 37% of trials overall

Milligram`s Study

inspired by WWII, thought people could be pressured into doing something evil, unethical, wonder if people would harm someone innocent, confederate: learner participant: teacher, if learner answered question wrong they would get electrical shock (not really just what they told teacher), told the teacher to increase voltage every time learner gets question wrong, learner protests, experimenter says "keep going", DV: do people obey or resist authority & IV: recorded protests & groans, experimenter says "keep going"

Why Did People Obey?

when experimenter was removed obedience was reduced, 60-65% of people obeyed the experimenter completed, up to shocks of 450 volts, people obeyed to a staggering degree, people were extremely upset but still did it, good people can do bad things, social pressure combined with uncertainty, confirming the wrong norm "obey authority", incremental change make it easier to justify continuing & lack of personal responsibility

Critiquing Milgram`s Research

Milgram didn't debrief all of the participants, spent years thinking they hurt this man, ethical problems, participants were distressed, believed they had no choice, no debriefing & gained power of situation; good people can do bad things

Contact Hypothesis

if you get two groups to interact then prejudice will reduce, because it reduces fear & cooperation

Color-blind

shouldn't notice race/differences & suppresses thoughts (doesn't work)

Multiculturalism

should appreciate differences & more effective